Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Researcher Puts Firefox OS On Raspberry Pi

judgecorp writes "Mozilla's mobile phone operating system only exists in an early beta form, but Oleg Romashin, a researcher at Nokia, has already got it working on the Raspberry Pi and posted video to prove it. We don't think this indicates any alternate strategy for Nokia if Windows Phone doesn't pan out, but it does show that Firefox OS is portable, and the Pi is capable, and both can be played with — which will please both Mozilla and the Raspberry Pi Foundation. And the Firefox OS work in progress is available for download (direct tarball link)."

48 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Well Played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Raspberry Pi, Nokia, Mozilla, Firefox all in one slashdot article - nice work.

    1. Re:Well Played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple's going to use Bitcoins to patent the idea.

  2. 224MB memory? Forget it. by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but with only 224MB memory, this is a bad idea. I've tried multiple browsers on Pi -- including full-blown like Firefox or Chromium, and minimalistic like Midori; the only one that's actually usable is elinks. Especially if pages as bloated as Slashdot are involved.

    Gooseberry, if it ever becomes something more than vapourware, might get into an usable range (512MB minus video memory).

    It's interesting how no graphical browser of today can cope with that little memory, when back in the day we could browse fine with 4MB.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  3. Nokia researcher? by hlavac · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this an attempt by Microsoft to fragment the Raspberry Pi platform?

    1. Re:Nokia researcher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would be utterly astonished if Microsoft was paying any attention to the Raspberry Pi "platform" at all. They can't even get the Slashdot commentards to take it seriously.

    2. Re:Nokia researcher? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the article doesn't mention under what capacity oleg did the porting work, pretty much that they just pulled from linkedin that he worked on meego browser.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by jcupitt65 · · Score: 2

    The mobile browsers work OK in that much memory. My ipad1 can browse fairly well and "only" has 256mb of ram.

  5. Re:Nokia driving the company in to the ground by hlavac · · Score: 2

    Nokia is an empty shell, zombie puppet company controlled by Microsoft. They have been running into the ground for some time now. They have no future. They are an asset being spent to push Microsoft agenda.

  6. Nice by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Better than the phones they been making the past few years.

  7. Re:Trickleware by stiggle · · Score: 2

    Farnell seem to be quicker at fulfilling orders than RS - plus you get a t-shirt.

  8. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    You might want to check out the VIA pico-ITX ARM board.

  9. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Looks like we have different definitions of "fairly well". After an aeon or two of swapping, it manages to render Slashdot after all, but I don't have that much patience. And, on many pages (sadly, Slashdot excluded), elinks is actually not that bad.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  10. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by Revotron · · Score: 2

    Rather than add more memory, why not use the architecture of the Pi to write a new browser that doesn't suffer from software bloat and scope creep? The RPi project was initially targeted at teaching children how to write programs that run on small, simple, and affordable systems with no fancy toolkits or bloated libraries.

    In other words, the way it used to be, when 256MB was a blessing and not a hindrance.

  11. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with Slashdot in Elinks? I browse this site and many others in Elinks everyday (right now actually) and haven't had any problems at all. Maybe it's because I'm on the old comment system.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  12. Re:Invalid form key !! by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    Maybe troll Slashdot with your user account instead of as an AC behind some jinky proxy and you won't have that problem next time. Just a thought.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  13. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by Threni · · Score: 1

    Slashdot doesn't render well on any mobile browser. I've tried Dolphin, Chrome, Firefox and the stock one on Android 4.0.4 (s3) and (most of those browsers on) 2.3.4 and 2.3.7 and it's horrible. I'm actually quite suprised at how little effort has been spent on this site for mobile. In particular, if you try and click on your user name at the top right of the screen you get the `options` and `accounts` links; it's impossible to click the username itself. Also, each subject doesn't wrap properly, forcing you to scroll left and right to read long ones. Finally, while I'm ranting, the options screens are completely unintuitive, which the little question mark link for help just restating the name of the option - not very helpful. Isn't there someone involved with Slashdot who can turn the mobile (view of this) site into something to be proud of? Failing that, just do a native Android app and be done with it.

  14. Re:Trickleware by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 1

    wrong - both RS and farnell are on continuous manufacturing at approx 4k each per week [ http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/1588 ] there is still a large backlog to get though though.
    RS seem to be worse
    farnell have been delivering within the week for some people.

    yes the drivers need a bit more work
    yes there is no accelerated x so that runs slow -
    yes they work fine if you have a good PSU and are lucky with usb keyboards .

    --
    who where what when now?
  15. The Pi is capable? by DrXym · · Score: 2

    The Pi is 700Mhz ARM processor with 256MB total memory (some reserved for GPU) and some hardware for OpenGL and MP4. The more you can push onto the GPU the better because the CPU is designed to power set top boxes and the like where the CPU should marshal the hardware and do as little as possible otherwise. So Raspbmc works okay for the most part because mp4 content is being powered by the hardware and there is only one main process running. But Raspbian demonstrates that a desktop performance is awful even with the lightest of configurations. I don't expect the performance of Firefox OS to be earthshattering. Even budget phones would have a faster CPU and more RAM than the Pi. It might run and be interesting for that, but I think performance will be poor especially on heavy content. So calling the Pi "capable" is reaching a bit.

  16. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

    From a technical POV, it's surprising just how much the Slashdot site sucks, given that it's written by and for geeks. Not only does it not work very well on mobile, but it also doesn't support Unicode. As a result, copying and pasting quotes will often result in garbage being inserted where there should be dashes, smart quotes, or other special characters. Come on, it's 2012; there's absolutely no excuse for this.

  17. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting how no graphical browser of today can cope with that little memory, when back in the day we could browse fine with 4MB.

    Back in the day, a good practice was limiting your entire page to under 100kb. Now, you're lucky if a page clocks under 1mb even with all the caching going on. Don't get me started on sites like the Huffington Post or Destructiod.

  18. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by vmlemon · · Score: 1

    Hmm, what about trying to build Escort (http://code.google.com/p/es-operating-system/wiki/UsingEscort) for the Raspberry Pi?

    It seems to be very lightweight; already runs on Linux; and it's based upon a new architectural design, and a brand new rendering engine. It shouldn't be too much of a hassle to build, time/dependencies-wise.

  19. Re:So? by MXPS · · Score: 1

    I ordered a Pi from Newark/element14 (a Farnell company) about 1.5 months ago and it finally got delivered yesterday. I would check them out if you are still looking for one. I am located in US, so I'm not sure if that will make a difference or not but I believe they ship internationally as well.

  20. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by rbrausse · · Score: 1

    it's surprising just how much the Slashdot site sucks

    this is /.'s USP - if the site would work flawlessly it would feel like a boring news aggregator...

  21. ...soon to be a ex-Nokia researcher by iampiti · · Score: 1

    "...as soon as Stephen Elop found out the researcher was thrown out of a window while Elop threw a chair and yelled "You don't disrespect Windows Phone like that!"."

  22. Re:Trickleware by SilenceBE · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ordered one with farnell and after 4 days it was delivered , even if the website states 5 weeks.

  23. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by csumpi · · Score: 2

    I'm using the official Raspbian image. When I start LXDE, run Scratch or Midori, I get only 10-20mb free memory.

    I quickly abandoned LXDE, installed xmonad, now I have 50-60megs left in the same scenario. While I love xmonad, and it's the only WM I use on all my linux machines, it's not for everyone. But even under xmonad, web browsing is at best super slow with Midori. Chromium is completely useless.

    We can get a lot of things to"run" on the RPi, or a machine with 256mb ram. But the real question is, can we get it to run well? Can it do a quick google search? Can it scroll through a webpage with decent speed?

    As it stands, I can see the RPi as a faster replacement for Arduino, with a wider range of development tools. But not as a standalone computer to be used in education with X and Scratch.

  24. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is horribly broken on mobile, but most other sites that aren't daft work well on an ipad1. It's certainly fine for casual use.

  25. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by csumpi · · Score: 1

    I'm running it off a 1.85A rated power supply. I have the latest firmware installed. Maybe I was just unlucky with all the keyboard issues, but so far I still have no keyboard that works flawlessly.
    As you said, it works well from the command line. If I just keep it running, it does not overheat. The overheating issues showed up when I was cross-compiling some packages. But the heat sinks seem to have fixed that for now.

  26. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by Hatta · · Score: 1

    As some other commenters noted, the 256mb memory is not enough to run X.

    That's quite plainly bullshit. I run X on a P200MMX with 128MB of RAM. X itself is quite efficient unless you start loading up kdelibs or some shit.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  27. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by Hatta · · Score: 1

    But even under xmonad, web browsing is at best super slow with Midori. Chromium is completely useless.

    With luck this will spur the development of an actually light weight web browser.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  28. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by csumpi · · Score: 1

    You are correct, I should've defined the use case better. I can run X on it fine. I can open multiple terminals under xmonad, ssh to my server and do some administration (although scrolling the terminal window atakes about a second to redraw in full screen). I can even browse the internet with elinks. I can control the GPIO from python.

    But it's not for running Midori, Scratch or gimp.

  29. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Yep. To create and maintain a web browser that is capable of rendering the current-day web, you need an army of developers.

  30. Re:Underpowered, with hardware issues by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    There's still Dillo... ;)

  31. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by corychristison · · Score: 1

    Thats about par with low end Android phones and tablets. My phone and tablet (each $150 or so) have around that 256MB RAM mark. Both seem to run the latest Firefox Mobile Beta fine.

    Optimization is always necessary, especially when something is written for x86 and compiled to ARM.

  32. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    From a technical POV, it's surprising just how much the Slashdot site sucks, given that it's written by and for geeks. Not only does it not work very well on mobile, but it also doesn't support Unicode. As a result, copying and pasting quotes will often result in garbage being inserted where there should be dashes, smart quotes, or other special characters. Come on, it's 2012; there's absolutely no excuse for this.

    Do not confuse geeks with website designers. It's just the same as assuming that since you can program, you can design a UI. Different skillsets, different specialities. Sure people think it's possible to do the other job, but the end result is usually quite nasty.

    And the reason Slashdot doesn't handle unicode is simple - it actually does, but it does it on a whitelist basis rather than a blacklist. There was a spurt of trolls sticking right-to-left override characters in their comments resulting in unreadable pages. So /. basically whitelists a few characters (since a lot of the valid codepoints aren't defined yet and may include even more control codes).

    Though it is fun from time to time sticking right-to-left override in a comment system to see if they blindly handle unicode...

  33. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    From my experience, no site render well on mobile browsers except if there is a website's version written for mobile devices. Something few are paying attention to.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  34. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by steelfood · · Score: 1

    That's because everything's done by the browser nowadays. Whereas in the past, you'd have static pages that the server dishes up with each interaction, today, you have the browser rendering all the interactions, with the server supplying only the variable data.

    For example, if this was old Slashdot, if you clicked on a comment, it opened up in a new page. For new Slashdot, if you clicked on a comment, the comment now opens up in the current page, while the rest of the page is reformatted (lenghtened, shortened, etc.) to include the new text. That's all done client-side.

    AJAX makes for snazzy pages by increasing the complexity all around. On a home machine, you can afford the slight (or sometimes not-so-slight) resource hit. On an embedded system, which the Raspberry Pi most resembles, you cannot.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  35. Re:So? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    Not sure why it is taking you so long. I ordered two from element14, took two days and three days respectively.

  36. Re:Trickleware by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

    I ordered two on two separate orders, one took two and the other three days.

  37. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by unixisc · · Score: 1

    And you forgot that it's not even available on IPv6

  38. Firefox on Nokia N9 renders well and is responsive by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Slashdot renders great on the last ~3 versions of Firefox mobile on my Nokia N9, (which are provided via OTA updates). Ajax and all, it is very responsive, while the rendering quality seems very well done. (It was good before those versions also, but it seems zippier and more responsive with each version since). Firefox on the N9 is a joy.

    Disclaimer: I made websites for a living, so I figure I am fairly discerning.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  39. In other news by mpfife · · Score: 1

    Chris Weber, the CEO and former Microsoft executive, fired Oleg Romashin stating that "Resistance to our Win7 strategy is futile. You will be eliminated."

  40. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    I recall the old days of EMS where a piece of software would double your memory by compressing/decompressing on the fly, whatever happened to those?

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  41. Raspberry Pi has 3 known USB faults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Three types of USB-related faults have finally been accepted by the Foundation, after a long struggle during which they denied everything for months:

    A. Limited endpoints:
    It can handle only 8 USB endpoints, which means that you can run out of endpoints when plugging in just 2 or 3 devices (a hub just uses up more endpoints and makes this still worse), and then the entire USB system and your networking dies.

    B. Data loss:
    The USB driver requires realtime response from the Linux kernel when handling USB's split transactions. Since Linux is not a realtime O/S, those transactions can fail depending on random Linux scheduling, and so the Raspberry Pi's USB system is plagued with intermittent USB data loss.

    C. Tracking fault:
    - The USB hub/Ethernet controller device (LAN9512) is incorrectly connected on the board, sharing its personal 1.8V regulator with the rest of the Raspberry Pi board. This is out of spec and seems to be responsible for the excessively high temperature of the USB chip, and may contribute to the USB problems.

    The Raspberry Pi Foundation's forum and the Raspberry Pi technical discussions group at Element 14 have many threads devoted to these issues.

  42. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

    I timed the slashdot homepage on an ipad1: 1.5s for something to appear, 5s for the whole thing to finish. Seems fine to me. The BBC homepage takes less than 3s and appears fully-functional.

  43. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    1) turn off javascript, it will help a shitton
    2) go look at webpages from the 4 meg days, now go look at a modern site, see how that works?

  44. Re:224MB memory? Forget it. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    0. install AdBlock, configure it to axe not just ads but also all trackers and similar sleaze. And especially all those Fecesbook/Google+/Twatter/whatever "likes".

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  45. zRam by tepples · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about something like RAM Doubler for classic Mac OS or zRam for Linux?