Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Store Entire Textbook In DNA

sciencehabit writes with this mind-boggling bit from Science Magazine: "When it comes to storing information, hard drives don't hold a candle to DNA. Our genetic code packs billions of gigabytes into a single gram. A mere milligram of the molecule could encode the complete text of every book in the Library of Congress and have plenty of room to spare. All of this has been mostly theoretical—until now. In a new study, researchers stored an entire genetics textbook in less than a picogram of DNA — one trillionth of a gram — an advance that could revolutionize our ability to save data."

3 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Take it one step further by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Store data in DNA, then figure out a way for our brains to interpret it as knowledge. Imagine being born with the combined understanding of all of the major fields of science, history, languages, crafts, trades, from day one.

    1. Re:Take it one step further by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Knowledge but not understanding. I think it is important to remember that those are two different things. Still it would be pretty neat.

  2. Re:How fast? by coldandcalculating · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fastest DNA polymerases can copy a template at around 250 bases/sec. Chemical DNA synthesis is much slower.

    As for read speeds, DNA sequencing can be done serially (500-800 bases in a matter of hours - 1 cent per base) or massively parallel (100-200 bases per read; 100 million reads; overnight - $1000 per chip by year's end?)

    Tools allowing for rapid synthesis (write) and sequencing (read) of DNA would enable a biotech revolution similar in scope and impact to the computing revolution of the last century. As far as I know, this technology is still incredibly far away, but definitely merits relentless R&D.