Judge Suggests Apple Is "Smoking Crack" With Witness List In Samsung Case

infodragon writes "Today in the ongoing Apple vs Samsung court case Judge Lucy Koh's patience wore thin as Apple presented a 75-page document highlighting 22 witnesses it would like to call in for rebuttal testimony, provided the court had the time. As those following the case closely know quite well, the case has a set number of hours which are already wearing quite thin. As quoted by The Verge as they sat in the courtroom listening in, Koh wondered aloud why Apple would offer the list 'when unless you're smoking crack you know these witnesses aren't going to be called!'"

Comments

At first I thought the Judge was biased

[Compaqt]

in favor of Apple.

Now I think her wild mood swings must mean she's medicating?

Re:At first I thought the Judge was biased

[Taco Cowboy]

If you do not know judge Lucy Koh, it's time you should know:

Before she was appointed a judge by Hussein Obama, Ms. Lucy Koh worked as a Patent Attorney

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_H._Koh

From 2002 until 2008, Koh worked as a litigation partner at the Silicon Valley office of the law firm McDermott Will & Emery representing technology companies in patent, trade secret and commercial civil matters.

Re:At first I thought the Judge was biased

[Kalriath]

No, no, with Groklaw it's anything that doesn't go 'their' way is because Microsoft paid off the judge.

Re:Please ignore...

[cpu6502]

>>>Posting to remove ability to mod story I submitted.

Bullshit. If you don't want to mod your own story, just don't mod it. It's that simple dummy.

As for apple "smoking crak" I'm not sure why this is news. Apple's bigest fans are non-computer artistic types, and all artists experiment with mind-enhancing drugs for an extra boost of creativity.