Slashdot Mirror


Exceptionally Preserved 2,600-Year-Old Brain Found

TrueSatan writes with this quote from Discovery News: "A human skull dated to about 2,684 years ago with an 'exceptionally preserved' human brain still inside of it was recently discovered in a waterlogged U.K. pit, according to a new Journal of Archaeological Science study. The brain is the oldest known intact human brain from Europe and Asia, according to the authors, who also believe it's one of the best-preserved ancient brains in the world (PDF). 'The early Iron Age skull belonged to a man, probably in his thirties,' according to lead author Sonia O'Connor. 'Cause of death is rarely possible to determine in archaeological remains, but in this case, damage to the neck vertebrae is consistent with a hanging.'"

44 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Intact human brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The brain is the oldest known intact human brain from Europe and Asia" – So I take it the brain still works?

    1. Re:Intact human brain? by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe after they transplant the brain in a brainless body, we'll find out why he was hanged in his time.

      Starring Christopher Lee and Vincent Price.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:Intact human brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quick, someone send it to the Houses of Parliament! An intact brain there will revolutionise our system of government!

    3. Re:Intact human brain? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      whatcouldpossiblygowrong...

      I smell a movie script for a very bad B-Movie. Working title "They saved prehistoric Hitler's brain"

      IN 3D!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Intact human brain? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      "Now, that brain that you gave me, was it Hans Delbruch's?"

      "Who's Brain Was it?"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Intact human brain? by readin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Something that occasionally bothers me is the question of how much a brain works after it is dead. We don't really understand consciousness so we don't know how much of the brain is responsible for it. In fact the only way we know (suspect?) our fellow humans are conscious is they tell us - ok I'm wondering in to Turing test territory which isn't where I want to go.

      Suppose we were to hit this old intact brain with a jolt of electricity - would it feel it? Would it be conscious at some level for a brief moment but completely unable to inform us? Would it suffer a brief horrible dream? It makes me feel like I want to have my brain completely obliterated somehow when I die so I can be sure there is nothing left that is capable of suffering.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    6. Re:Intact human brain? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      If that doesn't scream mid-season replacement, I don't know what does!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Intact human brain? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The brain is the oldest known intact human brain from Europe and Asia" – So I take it the brain still works?

      The card reads Abby Normal. Should be OK, what could go wrong?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Intact human brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Abby somebody.

    9. Re:Intact human brain? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Funny

      We know that he didn't weigh the same as a duck - those people were burned.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    10. Re:Intact human brain? by schlachter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The brain being intact at a gross level doesn't mean that it's intact at a cellular level...so I doubt the network topology of the brain is still in place. Besides, the brain has state which decays without active maintenance, so network topology alone is not sufficient.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    11. Re:Intact human brain? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only does it work, it is setting educational policy in Kentucky.

    12. Re:Intact human brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      None. After the brain is deprived of oxygen for a few minutes the cells die. Neurons have the highest cellular metabolic rate, among those the retina has the very very highest (you'll go blind before you go brain dead from general oxygen deprivation to the brain, or from sugar deprivation such as low sugar for a diabetic). The synapses of your brain won't fire without energy, so deprive them of that energy (sugar and oxygen) and they stop firing, thus you stop thinking. Low levels will cause your thoughts to generally slow down and scrable (hazy drunk like feeling). Generally the brain stem is the last to go as it has the highest suppy of oxgen. This means that you will first go blind, then lose reasoning skills and higher brain level skills, then motor skills and finally lose the ability for your lungs and heart to operate. Much better than the other way around I think, except for the blind part. By the time your heart stops you wont be really sentient anymore.

      This is all of course assuming your brain doesn't go into some kinda of synaptic crash before hand. (yea, its possible for your brain to just trigger a self destruct and die, cases of people who died from a fall that wouldn't have killed them, a shot that wouldn't have killed them, etc, the trauma was too much for their brain, so all those "if you die in the matrix you die out here" type of sci-fi thing are actually true)

    13. Re:Intact human brain? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>Suppose we were to hit this old intact brain with a jolt of electricity - would it feel it? Would it be conscious at some level for a brief moment but completely unable to inform us?

      The neurons disconnect from one another when they die. When you hold a dead brain, you are holding a blank slate. Which is why freezing people after they die is pointless. Even if you could revive the body, the brain has nothing in it. (No memory; the person would be a vegetable.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    14. Re:Intact human brain? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>>>>Maybe after they transplant the brain in a brainless body, we'll find out why he was hanged in his time.
      >>
      >>Convicted of a crime he didn't commit, of course...

      Good luck trying to understand his ancient Celtic language when he speaks. I can just imagine a bunch of language professors mumbling, "I don't know what he's saying. He's not pronouncing the words properly. It sounds like Hillbilly Celtic."

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    15. Re:Intact human brain? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      whatcouldpossiblygowrong...

      I smell a movie script for a very bad B-Movie. Working title "They saved prehistoric Hitler's brain"

      IN 3D!

      3D makes bad movies go good.

    16. Re:Intact human brain? by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After a shot to your heart your brain is still intact, but will soon cease working.

      "Will soon cease working" != "Doesn't work".

      Guess why it will stop working? Because it will cease being intact (due to missing oxygen).

      Obligatory car analogy:

      My engine is no longer intact because I ran out of fuel?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    17. Re:Intact human brain? by theshibboleth · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the body has a process that will start to chemically degrade the brain soon after death--unless that was somehow disrupted

    18. Re:Intact human brain? by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      And anonymous came from the greek term 'anonymos' meaning without a name, and coward came from the french word couard, meaning one with their tail between their legs.

      So you're one with their legs between their legs, who has no name.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  2. 2,684 years ago??? by al3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's only 2012!

    1. Re:2,684 years ago??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Earth is 6000 years old, you silly.

    2. Re:2,684 years ago??? by ccguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it's only 2012!

      I'll use an analogy to explain how this is possible. Imagine a game that is set in medieval times in which you are exploring castles 500 years old. The game is new, but the castles in it were old right from the start.

      God played the same trick with us. The universe is 6000 years old, but when it was created (when he inserted the CD, if it makes you feel more comfy) it already had extinct species, people that had been dead for a few centuries and so on.
      Clear now?

    3. Re:2,684 years ago??? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      They didn't account for leap years. Yes, yes, we only have one every 4 years, but in the older days when everything was better we had a LOT more of them!

      *sigh* Oh the good ol' times...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:2,684 years ago??? by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might only be 2012, but here's an article about this same brain from 2011, and it was actually discovered in 2008. "Old news," indeed.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  3. Abby someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Abby . . . Normal. I'm almost sure that was the name.

  4. Re:Roughly 2684 years old? by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    Around the time he was hanged.

  5. Zombie Apocalypse... by 25or6to4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently the zombie apocalypse will last longer than expected if their food source stays preserved for 2000 years!

  6. Re:Roughly 2684 years old? by metalmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    they couldnt get a good liver temp

  7. Brain and brain! What is brain? by stevegee58 · · Score: 2

    Oblig Trek reference.

  8. Re:Why is 3000 year old brain is a big deal? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

    Your hypothesis is that brains haven't changed much in 3,000 years. This brain is a good test of your hypothsis. What exactly is your problem with that?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  9. Re:that explains everything by Siberwulf · · Score: 2

    No evidence they weighed as much as a duck....

  10. Sounds like... by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it's in better shape than mine.

    --
    No sig? Sigh...
  11. Re:Why is 3000 year old brain is a big deal? by sinij · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thing is, there is very little you could test unless you get this 3,000 year old brain to boot up. Think of it this way - you are handed 2 non-working CPUs, could you tell if they are different? Perhaps if they have physically different (but human brains naturally deviate from the norm), but unless you have an ability to reverse-engineer these CPUs (and we don't have that ability for human brains) both would be just chunks of silicon.

    Related: Have you seen TED talk by Juan Enriquez?
    http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_will_our_kids_be_a_different_species.html

  12. "about"??? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ".. dated to about 2,684 years ago"

    Saying that it happened about 2684 years ago implies (at least to me) that they can date it between precisely 2683 and 2685 years. Does it not strike anyone else as odd that they could pinpoint something that long ago so precisely?

    1. Re:"about"??? by Minwee · · Score: 2

      There are three types of errors that programmers make: Logic errors, and off-by-one errors.

    2. Re:"about"??? by Hillgiant · · Score: 3, Funny

      ".. dated to about 2,684 years ago"

      Saying that it happened about 2684 years ago implies (at least to me) that they can date it between precisely 2683 and 2685 years. Does it not strike anyone else as odd that they could pinpoint something that long ago so precisely?

      It is a much rounder number in metric.

      --
      -
  13. "a waterlogged U.K. pit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh come on. Why not just say London.

  14. Take your pick by Dareth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Take your pick:
    A: He chiseled state secrets on a cave wall.
    B: He had consensual group sex with one of his students.
    C: Headbutted his wife, star of a campfire reality show.
    D: Was really Cowboy Neal using his new time machine.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  15. Re:that explains everything by cusco · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually there are quite a number (hundreds) of preserved corpses of people that were hanged from this period which have been recovered from bogs in northern Europe. The tannins in bog water preserve the skin quite well, in several cases police were called first because the discoverers thought it was a recent murder. Some of them still have the rope around their neck. This site was probably anoxic as well if the soft tissues were also preserved. A quick search on "bog bodies" will bring up a plethora of information.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  16. Re:you would hope by tylikcat · · Score: 2

    And that's what makes the more recent data about protein conformational changes so interesting - it gives the impression that there could be something vaguely equivalent to a hard disk, that it's not all electrical signals needing to be maintained, but something a little more enduring.

  17. Re:Why is 3000 year old brain is a big deal? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, For the love of Jean-Martin Charcot, never compare the brain to a computer in that way.

    "and we don't have that ability for human brains"
    Stop it, jsut STOP! gah.

    Shape, size, topology, chemical makeup all have meaningful information, even if we can't get to the memories.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Re:Abby Someone's Brain by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He might be unfit for THAT society. Most modern civilized people would be considered unfit in a lot of societies 3000 years ago.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Monty Python by guttentag · · Score: 2

    I bet if you hook it up to a speaker and say, "Bring out your dead!" it will reply, "I'm not dead!"