Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google, Oracle Deny Direct Payments To Media

Posted by Soulskill on from the many-disappointed-critics dept.

itwbennett writes "Earlier this month, the judge in the Oracle v. Google trial ordered the companies to disclose the names of bloggers and reporters who had taken payments from them. Not surprisingly, both companies have denied making direct payments to writers (with the exception of Florian Mueller of FOSSPatents, whose relationship to Oracle was disclosed in April). But Oracle has tattled on Google regarding some indirect connections. In particular, Oracle called out Ed Black for an article he wrote about the case for Forbes. And Jonathan Band, co-author of the book, 'Interfaces on Trial 2.0,' which Google cited in its April 3, 2012 copyright brief." Groklaw has an in-depth look at the filings. Oracle's fingerpointing is based in part on this BBC article and this piece at The Recorder, both of which they entered into evidence. Google's filing (PDF) affirmed that they have not paid media for articles or done any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage. However, they acknowledged that many people receive money from Google through other means (the company's philanthropy, ad business, etc.), and asked the judge if he wanted further details about those instances.

5 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. My recommendation by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pie fight in the courtroom.

    I don't know about Oracle and Google, but I think I'd enjoy it.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:My recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully the pies that hit Oracle's lawyers will have hand grenades in them.

    2. Re:My recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      >The important question then becomes what kind of pie?

      Cow pie.

  2. Florian thread! by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    And finally one worth having, too.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. dammit Google, you did it again! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google's filing (PDF) affirmed that they have not paid media for articles or done any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage. However, they acknowledged that many people receive money from Google through other means (the company's philanthropy, ad business, etc.), and asked the judge if he wanted further details about those instances.

    stupid Google, dont you know that as a corporation you are supposed to deny and impede any attempt to get information about what you've done and tie it up in court for years? just look at Oracle, they deny everything until the bitter end and fight tooth and nail to budge an inch on any information at all. i mean, volunteering information? for shame!

    this "don't be evil" stuff is really getting in the way of becoming a well adjusted sociopathic corporation.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.