Slashdot Mirror


Russia's Former KGB Invests In Political Propaganda Spambots

An anonymous reader writes "The newspaper Kommersant reports that the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (formerly part of the KGB) has invested 30 million roubles (USD $940,000) on 'blog and social network intelligence' programs (Google translation of Russian original). A small part of that money is used for surveillance and analytics, but 22 million roubles (USD $690,000) is invested in 'mass distribution of messages in social networks with a view to the formation of public opinion.' Which presumably can be rephrased as 'launching massive pro-Kremlin astroturfing propaganda spambots in order to stifle and undermine political dissent.' The brazen Russian government acknowledgement of this investment indicates that the Kremlin does not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical. No words whether these spambots would respect any anti-spam laws or the Terms and Conditions of victim websites. But hey, now you can accuse anyone you disagree with online of being a 'KGB bot'!"

29 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Heading back to the bad old days by bmo · · Score: 2

    So who is going to be the first one to restart Kremvax?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Heading back to the bad old days by stox · · Score: 2

      and nsacray.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  2. Obligatory Yakov... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Putin's Russia, Twitter Updates You...

    1. Re:Obligatory Yakov... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps...but I also think that...

      In Putin's Russia, Spam eats you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  3. They're amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This mr. Anonymous Reader does not have a clue. With the military budget of the US, they could do:
    - http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2011/11/04/the-cia-is-watching-us-intelligence-teams-monitor-5-million-tweets-every-day/
    - http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=2229
    - http://mashable.com/2012/05/23/fbi-spy-on-skype/
    - http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
    etc

    If the FBI and CIA could do it for a lousy 1 million dollar, they'd chosen for this option too. This indicates the CIA and FBI do not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical, but that they are inefficient.

  4. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must strongly disagree. In my analysis, strong AI doesn't exist outside of science fiction novellas, and thus furthermore and therefore is a ridiculous accusation to make. I urge you my dear and wonderful readers, to ignore the implausible and outlandish statements made by the anonymous coward in the parent comment. Every nuance of his or her preposterous claims only further their own inherent absurdity.

  5. KGB, in 2012? by yeltski · · Score: 3

    Seriously? It's been more than 20 years, how long does it take for you Americans to move on from your Cold War Hollywood production induced knowledge base of the world? Next, you'll find out that CIA spends millions on recruitment and *gasp* pro-WhiteHouse astroturfing propaganda in order to stifle and undermine political dissent.

    1. Re:KGB, in 2012? by azalin · · Score: 2

      I'm looking forward to the Obama-Romney bot war because it might be an actual improvement on the quality of the average statement.

    2. Re:KGB, in 2012? by GCsoftware · · Score: 2

      Belarus too, where the org is still called KGB. Gotta love the Belarussian regime, it has some balls.

  6. Link to original story? by methamorph · · Score: 3, Informative

    So instead of a link to the original story we get a link to Google translate?

    1. Re:Link to original story? by ACS+Solver · · Score: 5, Informative

      Link to story: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2009256

      Interesting moments are as follows. There are three projects for which software has been requested. One is for "researching the methods of intelligence in Internet centers and regional segments of social networks", another is for "researching the unofficial methods of management on the Internet", and finally work on "methods for advancing special information in social networks". So essentially, it's figuring out how to make certain information popular on social networks, and figuring out the dynamics and largely emergent social structures within these networks. These are designed to work together, ultimately with the bots capable of "massive dissemination of information in specified social networks using existing user accounts, with the goal of forming the public opinion".

      Given that the SVR is behind this, it's likely that the intent, at least originally, is to use this abroad, not within Russia. The article says so and quotes a source saying ex-USSR countries would be the first target. That bit certainly looks realistic given the geopolitical situation there, with Russia essentially being in a state of low-key information warfare versus some former Soviet states.

    2. Re:Link to original story? by udachny · · Score: 2

      Here is that silly article from Kommersant.

      After reading it I don't think it should be taken seriously (it's not your NSA or CIA, Russia doesn't have the kind of people right now that would take a project like this seriously and not just steal the money).

      My quick translation:

      Kommersant's sources say that the intelligence agency started a number of programs, with code names 'Storm-12', 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' back in January-February of 2012. The idea is to create following programs:

      1. To investigate methods of intelligence gathering from Internet providers and data centres and social networks (code name 'Dispute' at 4.41 million rubles).

      2. To investigate methods of 'silent management within the Internet' (code name 'Monitor' at 4.99 million rubles).

      3. To conduct a scientific type of research in order to develop 'means of pushing special information within social networks' - this means astroturfing (code name 'Storm-12' at 22.8 million rubles).

      The three projects are interdependent, the plan is to monitor the Internet and social networks with the 'Dispute' system, which is supposed to 'research processes of social network formation and information dissemination within them' as well as 'establishing the factors that are responsible for the increasing influence and dissemination of information', basically trying to figure out why some information becomes more popular, how do things go viral as opposed to other things (I suggest they start by analysing LOLCAT videos for that).

      Once the information is collected it is supposed to be analysed by 'Monitor-3', which is responsible for 'developing the methods of organisation and management of the Internet virtual social networks by using experts, setting tasks, controlling the work of social media, regularly collecting information from the experts in their respective fields'. (Actually this part doesn't read well in Russian and translating something that is written so poorly and ambiguously in one language into another is not easy. This is part of the reason, except for the minuscule funds, why I wouldn't take this program seriously.)

      Lastly, 'Storm-12' is then supposed to introduce managed information into the social networks based on the collected data. Its task is described very poorly and grammatically ambiguously as the following: 'development of special programming system of automated dissemination of information within large social networks. Organisation of information support structures into predefined scenarios in order to have a desired affect upon the mass audience of social networks.' The purpose of this 'virtual military' is described as 'mass dissemination of information messages within the (monitored) social networks, with existing user accounts, in order to shape public opinion. Aggregation of statistics and analysis of effectiveness of management of public opinion. Analysis of usefulness of the most popular social services as vectors of initialisation of information waves for directing the public opinion about various matters'.

      Kommersan'ts sources say that in order to make the programs secret, the government passed the following bills: N1116-36 on 23 of December, 2011.

      Supposedly the systems 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' will be ready in 2012 and 'Storm-12' will be ready in 2013'.

      --------

      and so on and so forth. I can tell you this much: this entire story reads like a bad spy thriller, it's just not plausible.

      It is IMPOSSIBLE to do anything for that amount of money in Russia, with that much money they won't even be able to set up a server room, never mind paying the right people the right amounts of money to do any of this work. This is complete nonsense.

      I am not saying that Russia is not doing something like this, in fact by

    3. Re:Link to original story? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      No, it's just easier to track CIA funding that goes to those "dissidents" through "international" "non-governmental" organizations.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  7. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    the US uses a strong AI

    Only for the voices in your head.

    --
    BMO

  8. Introducing the Yakov Entendre by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Funny

    In America, Facebook shares tank. In Russia, tank shares Facebook.
    __

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  9. Soviet tradtions by cold+fjord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It appears that the Russians are working to restore and update the Russian nee Soviet state's ability to conduct political warfare, which was quite powerful. Some of the lies they spread have yet to die down. Since the Russian state seems to heading back towards Soviet methods and attitudes, everyone should be concerned.

    Soviets Sponsor Spread of AIDS Disinformation

    A Soviet political warfare manual comments on 'socialist education'

    Soviet methods did not spare their allies.

    A Portrait of Stalin: Secret Police

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  10. How many govs do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    At least the russians are transparent about it. How many governments do it in the shadow?
    Argentina government since a couple of years ago is known to infiltrate twitter and facebook with thousands of fake virtual accounts that supports (spanish) the current government. They also have an army of people actively checking internet and posting in forums, they discovered them by correlation with working hours (nobody post after 6 pm, nicks are auto-generated using a known algorithm and stuff like that)
    I bet they use a software package for this purposes. Didn't Palantir offered something like this?

  11. Propaganda? I call it advertisement. by prefec2 · · Score: 2

    So the Russian secret service does the same shit companies do. they want to bend public opinion in their direction. However, normally (as in Western countries) governments do not need to do that, because the media is on their side (or to be more precise the government is on the side of the media). So the move in Russia indicates, that the mass population moves away from classic media as their source of information towards other platforms and therefore they have to control those too. So in short. They control the media (as like in a dictatorship) and now this Internet thing causes disruption. So they try to control it too.

    What shall I say? I am not surprised. I am only surprised that it came out. But, I guess that does not hurt the endeavor.

  12. Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    indicates that the Kremlin does not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical

     
    I have to confess that I did feel a little bit queasy reading what Timothy has posted
     
    This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile
     
    It was the West who have fine-tuned activities such as being described in TFA to an art-form, in the first place
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by beerbear · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sounds like something a KGB bot would say!

      --
      Hold my beer and watch this!
    2. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by cbraescu1 · · Score: 2

      This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Is that simple.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    3. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Is that simple.

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you see things as they really are and haven't drunk the corporate Kool-aid.

      FTFY

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    4. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know what? Fuck you and your "Blame everything on the West and/or Democracy" attitude. I see you on here all the time posting similar crap, if you spent half your slashdot bitching time reading a history book you wouldn't make such moronic statements. People have been paying people to say crap that isn't strictly true for as long as we've had language and the concept of property ownership. People have been shilling and lying anonymously since the invention of the written word. I'm willing to bet thousands of years ago some guy painted a picture on a cave wall that showed himself defeating three bears with a fucking knife, when in reality he stumbled across a carcass while fucking the chief's daughter in the bushes.

      It was the West who have fine-tuned activities such as being described in TFA to an art-form, in the first place

      Oh really? We invented propaganda? We fine-tuned its delivery? Do you have some kind of fundamental mental problem which prevents you from knowing anything about the world prior to the 19th century? Because you sure seem to have a pretty fucking poor grasp on reality.

      We have, actually. If you're interested you should read up on Walter Lippman and Edward Bernays. They were early advertising/public relations pioneers in the early 20th century. After the success that was had whipping up the public to support WWI, it was realized that public opinion could be shaped by the use of subtle propaganda. As Bernays said in his 1928 book "Propaganda",

      "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

      We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.

      So as you can see, he was sort of a proto-technocrat. But his techniques worked to guide people into various opinions and mindsets. These techniques, more refined, are used today by just about anyone who wishes to shape the public mind, whether it be towards a particular product or a political viewpoint. In our own government Cass Sunstein, President Obama's Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, has had quite a bit to say about guiding public opinion. From his Wikipedia page:

      Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting "nongovernmental officials"; they suggest that "government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes," further warning that "too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed."[25] Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, "might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts."

      So yes, the USA has made great strides in using propaganda. Though they didn't invent it, as you point out. But I'm always glad when these types of stories come out. Because I think it's important for people to understand and realize that this stuff goes on. Most people are unaware that their opinions are not entirely their own.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  13. Agreement, Accord & Concordance by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my analysis, strong AI doesn't exist outside of science fiction novellas, and thus furthermore and therefore is a ridiculous accusation to make.

    The way you write makes me want to punch you. " thus furthermore and therefore", really?

    I agree with you, yours, yourself and those who bear a yoursimilitude to you. The above poster, writer, author of the comment referred to, listed and discussed has undercut, severed and bisected his own cogent word assembly through unnecessarily, avoidable and inessential verbal repetition. And while hyperbole was the purpose, object and function of the conjunctions, and I can understand feeling frustrated, angry or annoyed, I feel that physical violence is an inappropriate, disproportional and incongruous conclusion, ceasing, cessation, close, closure, completion, consequence, culmination, desistance, ending, finale, finish, issue, outcome, result, and end.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  14. Re:just like the US by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  15. Re:just like the US by Burz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

    -jcr

    Indeed, and we're brazen about it, too.

    The difference I see is that Russian news doesn't blatantly lead into news stories with comments like, "The same government that corralled natives away from most of the country and then conducted germ warfare against them...". Or, "The ex-Opium War aggressor today is making news with...". At least not since the USSR.

    Americans and other native anglophones of all stripes love them some Russophobia (which is why I'll probably be modded down), and they'll find opportunities to serve it up with just about anything. The only way that Russian characters ever seem to be redeemed on US television shows is if they have emigrated to an anglophone country, or are trying to do so. A Russian who wants to stay a Russian national (or to belong to another non-English speaking country) is portrayed as a villain -- every single time I have viewed.

  16. Old News - CN, US, SA, IL ... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 2

    RU is late to the game, 'mass distribution of messages in social networks with a view to the formation of public opinion.'

    Sometimes I suspect MS, other businesses/lobbyist, mega-churches, and PACs, are already acting like government G2Agencies on /., Facebook, Twitter, Wired ... with automated SocialPolicyAgents (SPAgents).

    So, why argue with GIGO SPAgents? SPAgents work in the best interest of a few of the $public$.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  17. The west has no need for state propoganda by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The western capitalist system has no need for state propaganda. The masses are all to happy to watch, devour no worship the opinions and lifestyles of the 1% who tell them that the 1% deserve to be the top and everyone else has a chance too even if they never ever get even remotely close with their part time burger flipping job.

    What am I talking about? Media. Name ONE person in Media who makes less then 100.000 dollars per year. One TV celeb, just ONE! In many ways, Reality TV is a very risky move, showing the non-1% and allowing them to speak? Showing that work is hard and dangerous and it never gets any better? OOPS! Ah but luckily, reality stars get payed big, so soon they are the 1% too.

    Public opinion in the West is made on TV and TV makes big money for all involved. Of course they are going to be pro-big money. It is like asking Oprah on how to make it from day to day with just 2 dollars per day for food. She eats ten dollars in a single snack. She hasn't lived the live of her audience in decades.

    And she is not alone. Rappers? The ones you know ain't from the hood anymore, they live in guarded mansions and drive in armored cars.

    American propaganda is simple, it shows only the lottery winners, 1 lucky winner won 300 million! Watch and admire him and aspire to do the same. Saying tat 300 million people lost a dollar they could have spend better... that would not be such a good ad.

    Everyone who you see in America on TV, has made it. What better way to indoctrinate the American Dream.

    But hey, why believe me, I am posting on the blogsite of poster boys of the American Dream. After all, they made it, so so could you. Right? It couldn't possibly be that the 1% by definition will always be the 1%? Nah, that is commy thinking. Everyone can be the 1% if they just work hard.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  18. Star Trek by neoshroom · · Score: 2

    I thought AI never use contractions.

    No, that's just Star Trek. You have to take Star Trek with a grain of salt. I mean, it's a fictional world where somehow they figured out strong AI before they figured out how to give an android a realistic skin tone and where they all run around with iPads but still use flip phones to talk to the ship.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.