Slashdot Mirror


Misunderstanding of Prior Art May Have Led to Apple-Samsung Verdict

One of the interesting tidbits that came out of last week's billion-dollar verdict in Apple v. Samsung was that the jury's foreman, a patent holder himself, was instrumental in leading the other members through the various complicated infringement claims. Now, Groklaw analyzes an interview the man gave with Bloomberg News (video), in which his statements reveal a basic misunderstanding of what qualifies as prior art. Quoting Groklaw: "In discussing the first patent on the list, he says they got into a discussion about the prior art that was presented at trial. Here's why they discounted it: 'The software on the Apple side could not be placed into the processor on the prior art and vice versa. That means they are not interchangeable. That changed everything right there.' That isn't disqualifying for prior art. It doesn't have to run on the same processor. It doesn't have to run at all. It can be words on a piece of paper. (If you don't believe little old me, here's a lawyer noticing the video too now.) ... The foreman, in answering criticisms, says that the jury paid close attention to the jury instructions. But looking at this one, did they? I'm sure they meant to, and I'm also sure they did their best according to what they understood. But this was an error, and it's one I don't think the judge can ignore, if anyone brings it to her attention."

6 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hey now, by bshellenberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    O.J. agrees, and says "thank you".

    --
    Karma: Neutered
  2. Re:Why all the butthurt? by Scragglykat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, seeing as this case obviously proves that Samsung products are exactly like Apple products, it does sound like there are millions of people being overcharged ;o)

  3. Re:Use him for appeal by Scragglykat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously that is the appeal. :o)

  4. Re:Hey now, by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    O.J. agrees, and says "thank you".

    If the software don't fit, you must convict.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  5. Re:It's worse than that. by Vintermann · · Score: 5, Funny

    No no, you cannot put it into the same processor. That changes everything right there.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  6. Re:Hey now, by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the corners are round, you must impound.