Slashdot Mirror


Linus Torvalds Says Linux 4.0 Could Be Out In Three Years

darthcamaro writes "The wait between Linux 2.x and 3.x was a long one, but the wait to Linux 4? Well, that will only be a matter of three years, according to Linus Torvalds. '"It's just mentally much easier for people to remember the small number," Torvalds said during the LinuxCon conference in San Diego [Wednesday]. "We'll do 4.0 in three years maybe when the sub numbers have grown in the 20's and our feeble brains can't handle it."'"

10 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Just numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Judging from 3.0 which didn't have any breakthrough features included, this is just silly numbers talk.

    1. Re:Just numbers by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Judging from 3.0 which didn't have any breakthrough features included, this is just silly numbers talk.

      that's exactly what he said, it's just a number.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. Does it matter? by CadentOrange · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're merely version numbers, after all.

  3. 3.20's? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We'll do 4.0 in three years maybe when the sub numbers have grown in the 20's and our feeble brains can't handle it.

    If your numbers are going to be arbitrary, why not roll them over at 3.9?

  4. Not dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Focusing on parallel execution and efficient scheduling of large number of processors.

    Scheduling is now a rather complex item requiring more than just memory+ready to run.

    Memory (where is the memory in a distributed system).
    ready to run (where is the available processor)
    scheduling additional constraints such as communication delays between memory and processor, between processor and peripheral, between peripheral and memory (DMA).
    How to compute appropriate weighting efficiently, and fast.
    Detecting complex distributed deadlocks, and determining recovery strategy with a minimum of computation time lost.

    It gets much more complicated with such poorly designed architectures such as the X86.

    What would be a better design for distributed systems? What kind of network should be used? What kind of granularity in scheduling is needed? What should be doing the scheduling ? Hardware, as in torus designs? or bus switch now that multimode fiber makes serial computing fast again?

    What kinds of OS for a serial processor (or a optical processor where inputs strictly come from an input stream and continue to a separate output stream) should be used?

    Lots of questions.

  5. Re:Also by hobarrera · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why isn't here a "+1 Funny Troll" mod?

  6. Re:Firefox by ThePhilips · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an factually incorrect statement.

    3 years, at 52 weeks per year, is 156 weeks. With a version bump every 6 weeks, in 156 weeks, FireFox would reach version: current version + 156/6 = 15 + 26 = FireFox 41.

    What I'm trying to say here: one doesn't even have to exaggerate...

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  7. And this is news because ? by Foske · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Linux 5.0 could be out tomorrow. Linus just has to say "this is 5.0". What does that tell us ? Absolutely nothing. Sorry Slashdot, I expected a bit better from you.

  8. Re:Firefox by Filip22012005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your mistake is linear extrapolation. Firefox' versioning seems to be exponential.

    --
    When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
  9. Re:Also by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because if it's funny it's not a troll.