Slashdot Mirror


Iran and North Korea Team Up To Fight State-Sponsored Malware

An anonymous reader writes, quoting the article: "At the start of this month, news broke that Iran and North Korea have strengthened their ties, specifically by signing a number of cooperation agreements on science and technology. The two states signed the pact on Saturday, declaring that it represented a united front against Western powers. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, told Kim Yong Nam, North Korea's ceremonial head of state, the two countries have common enemies and aligned goals. On Monday, security firm F-Secure weighed in on the discussion. The company believes Iran and North Korea may be interested in collaborating against government-sponsored malware attacks such as Duqu, Flame, and Stuxnet."

191 comments

  1. superhero team by noh8rz8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    thank goodness, like the fantastic four. now only if they would team up to fight nuclear nonproliferation! like atom man and fallout boy.

    --
    You want to upvote/downvote? Go back to Reddit! Here we mod up/mod down.
    1. Re:superhero team by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

      More like the Wonder Twins. Except I'm not sure which one gets to be the animal, and which would have to be the lame bucket of water.

      Maybe Kim Il Sung will claim he invented the Wonder Twins - he's gotta start somewhere.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  2. Hmm... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing that was an unintended consequence of those malware programs. Unless there's an advantage I don't see with Iran and North Korea strengthening ties.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      Ya I think driving Iran and North Korea into having stronger bonds is an unintended consequence. I also am not looking forward to the political mud slinging over this.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm guessing that was an unintended consequence of those malware programs. Unless there's an advantage I don't see with Iran and North Korea strengthening ties.

      The military-industrial complex needs enemies. I'm on the edges of the "cybersecurity" business and its been apparent for years now that there is a huge push to play up the risks with respect to national security because there are Cosmos-level contracting dollars at stake (i.e. billions and billions). This sort of escalation perfectly feeds that narrative.

      Stuxnet is going to pay huge dividends for the company that wrote it, not because of the success in Iran, but because of the massive funding for the coming "cyberwar" that stuxnet provoked - imaginary or otherwise.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unintended, but hardly unforeseeable, so why would there be mudslinging? Any sort of broad-based sanction will likely lead to increased ties between people who can't do business anywhere else. National self interest is an older game than you seem to think.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Unintended, but hardly unforeseeable, so why would there be mudslinging?

      'Cause that's what politicians and demagogues do.

      Now you can blame your least favorite politician of the past 30 years for "allowing this to happen".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Hmm... by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Republicans will say Obama, some how caused North Korea and Iran to hop into bed, and forget to mention that they would of followed the exact same policies or done worse and got us into another unfunded pointless war in the middle east.

      I'm not sure if there will be any mud slinging about this before the election as I doubt the republicans want to draw attention to foreign affairs after Romney's rather terrible overseas trip and the fact his ticket has no foreign policy experience at all but still I can see it happen.

    6. Re:Hmm... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      This sort of escalation perfectly feeds that narrative.

      I'm afraid you're right. The call to war just might be more well received by the voters now. Exactly what the doctor ordered. It won't be limited to 'cyber' either. "This is WAR!" Hail, Hail, Freedonia, land of the brave and free...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Hmm... by gman003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unless there's an advantage I don't see with Iran and North Korea strengthening ties.

      It's called the "Slytherin Plan" - gather all your troublemakers and ne'er-do-wells and put them in one spot, so you always know where the next attack is coming from (pro-tip: it's coming from the hive of scum and villainy you just made by doing so).

    8. Re:Hmm... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      In other words, same shit as always, but now with much lower body counts? And instead of developing better explosives, we'll be developing better software security that might actually have real uses?

      Don't get me wrong, I hate to go on the internet and be optimistic, I know that's not cool, but this sounds positive...

    9. Re:Hmm... by Genda · · Score: 1

      I see this as an opportunity. Slip North Korea a couple faulty nuclear triggers and some time next week both county's nuclear programs should be lazily drifting downwind from a large blue glass ashtray. Whoops! Go straight from tickling the dragons tail to kissing its ass... can you say critical mass!

      The best part is we can all just shake our heads and say "Hey, ya need a little technical assistance? We've done this before, be glad to help you bandage that owwy... 2,000 lbs of yellow cake? $10.5 million dollars. A uranium enrichment plant? $526 million dollars. An unplanned nuclear detonation in your nuclear bomb works? Priceless!

    10. Re:Hmm... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Unintended, but hardly unforeseeable, so why would there be mudslinging?

      'Cause that's what politicians and demagogues do.

      Now you can blame your least favorite politician of the past 30 years for "allowing this to happen".

      Just 30 years? I want to blame all of them at least back to Nixon.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    11. Re:Hmm... by Genda · · Score: 1

      Allowing what to happen? Fred Flintstone and Barny Rubble become partners in building weapons of mass destruction? Oh be still my heart. Anybody with an IQ above small single digits should be able to manipulate this situation all day long to hilarious situation-comedic effect. Think of it as "Laverne and Shirley" with fissionable materials... "One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Schlemiel, Shlemazel, Hasenpfefffer Incorpor BOOM!

    12. Re:Hmm... by Genda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And that would change anything how? The Reps are claiming Obama is the Antichrist and the Dems are calling all the Reps a bunch of Knuckle Draggers and Mouth Breathers. Two guys at the Republican Convention start throwing nuts at a black CNN camera person. When ask what they're doing they respond "Feeding the Animals." By the way, they got tossed out on their ears, but Sheriff Joe Arpaio, is there with a badge on declaring a special "Honorary". This ftom the guy who would hunt and skin Illegal Mexicans if they'd just stop classifying them as human. Forgive me but the Republican Convention just proved the Reps haven't got the vaguest clue how to fix the mess we're in (except rape the middle class and give their organs to the wealth), and that they don't care anything for the middle class save caring that the middle class think they care about the middle class. Now we get to see what a bunch of weenies the Dems will be roasting. Someone said you gotta have more than clowns to run a circus. I don't know if D.C. is proof or the exception.

    13. Re:Hmm... by khallow · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not sure if there will be any mud slinging about this before the election as I doubt the republicans want to draw attention to foreign affairs after Romney's rather terrible overseas trip and the fact his ticket has no foreign policy experience at all but still I can see it happen.

      I on the other hand hope there's lots of mudslinging. There's no more truth or objectivity in placid campaigns than enraged ones. And the latter have a lot more spirit and engagement to them. Politeness is vastly overrated in politics anyway.

      And "Romney's rather terrible overseas trip"? Ignoring that that's an awfully weak talking point, how is that worse than the typical Obama overseas trip? At least, he hasn't tried to insult his hosts or murmured the exact same platitudes to numerous different host countries.

    14. Re:Hmm... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, same shit as always, but now with much lower body counts?

      Depends on how you measure "body count" - if it takes death by kinetic weapon to qualify, then sure. If it means slow deaths, like losing 10 years off a person's lifespan due to poor medical care, malnutrition, environmental pollution or whatever because resources were poorly allocated then no.

      Furthermore, just as tasers seem to encourage misuse because of their advertised non-lethality, we stand a good chance of finding escalation of international conflict because of the less-obvious lethality of this sort of engagement.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the massive funding for the coming "cyberwar"

      I suppose the DHS had a limit on how much money they could earn for their job of 'scaring' terrorists out of the USA.

      The problem with anti-terrorism is, soon one knows which organisations are terrorists, who could be a terrorist, and even who are FBI creations. Tracking that means a lot of employees but not big-money contracts.

      But with the calculus of software, the number of algorithms that can be 'weaponized' is infinite. Building defenses means big money and will hopefully improve IT security. But that gives every terrorist/drug lord/pedophile an impenetrable system.

    16. Re:Hmm... by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just 30 years? I want to blame all of them at least back to Nixon.

      Wait a minute, it's been over 30 years since...? Aw frak...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    17. Re:Hmm... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Just 30 years? I want to blame all of them at least back to Nixon.

      A bit over 30, but I don't think you can reasonably go back beyond when they kicked our buddy the Shah out.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    18. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well... glad to see this conversation eschewed hyperbolic rhetoric in favor of staying on the rails of constructive dialog.

    19. Re:Hmm... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Forgive me but the Republican Convention just proved the Reps haven't got the vaguest clue how to fix the mess we're in (except rape the middle class and give their organs to the wealth), and that they don't care anything for the middle class save caring that the middle class think they care about the middle class.

      I'm not sure how you managed it, but it appears that you went here when you should have gone here for information on the Republican platform. See? No baby eating or organ selling.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re:Hmm... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Ya I think driving Iran and North Korea into having stronger bonds is an unintended consequence. I also am not looking forward to the political mud slinging over this.

      I bet they don't trust each other though.

    21. Re:Hmm... by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the USA didn't make iran and north korea. this would disavow the existence of millions of human beings who of their own volition have made it their life's work to militarize and issue bellicose language for decades

      oh i know "in ancient history cold war, the USA did {XYZ} to country {ABC}. therefore, the USA is forevermore 100% responsible for what country {ABC} does." with such stunning intellectual analysis, nevermind completely condescension and patronization of iranians and north koreans as nothing but cardboard cutouts of american actions, how can one argue?

      also, i like how it disavows the USA of anything that happens in afghanistan. since because the USSR invaded it in the 1980s, by some idiot's logic, that means 100% of everything in afghanistan is Russia's fault forever. Oh wait, I'm sorry! We sold Osama bin Laden a stinger missile in the 1980s, so therefore, everything the man does after that is 100% our fault. sorry, i have to get with the mindless blanket blame game program and stop thinking of these people as having free will and the ability to create their own agenda, and remember that they are all just reflections of past american actions, of course

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    22. Re:Hmm... by shentino · · Score: 1

      So is fanatical hatred of foreign nations that don't share your ideology.

    23. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romney's terrible overseas trip is somehow like the current POTUS going abroad?
      That Romney debacle was so bad we're still laughing our asses off of that particular instance of infamous American arrogance (tm).
      Managing to pass for a dofus in front of all your closest allies was quite a sight to behold.
      We can't vote in your stead but we sure as hell can laugh at your ridiculous circus you call an election.

    24. Re:Hmm... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you managed it, but it appears that you went here when you should have gone here for information on the Republican platform. See? No baby eating or organ selling.

      This platform seems a bit weak. When will America finally have a party whose members work to outlaw abortion, reduce access to contraception, deny gay marriage, and shoe-horn religion in to the science classroom?

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    25. Re:Hmm... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The military-industrial complex needs enemies.

      It is more correct to say that the nature of America's enemies determines the resources devoted to military procurement. That has changed considerably over time, and is presently around 5%.

      . . . defense spending was 37.5% of GDP in 1945 (WWII), in 1953 (Korea) it was 14.2%, and at the peak of Vietnam (1968) it was 9.4%. -- Defense Spending Already Below Average

      Defense Spending as Percentage of GDP Well Below Historical Average

      The "Military-Industrial Complex" doesn't seem very successful if it is supposed to be driving defense spending - the resources devoted to it have had a strong negative trend since WW2. Heahthcare takes up something like 3-4x the resources spent on defense at present, and total social welfare spending also dwarfs the defense budget.

      Health-Care Spending to Reach 20% of U.S. Economy by 2021

      Spending on hospital visits, medications and other health care rose an estimated 3.9 percent in 2011 and consumed about 17.9 percent of GDP, the same as the previous two years, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said yesterday. The increases in such expenditures will continue to outpace economic growth projections, jumping 7.4 percent in 2014, when much of the insurance expansion created by the health law begins.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    26. Re:Hmm... by dintech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the USA didn't make iran and north korea

      Maybe they did a little bit...

      Iranian_Revolution#Historical_background

      Korean_War#Factors_in_U.S._intervention

    27. Re:Hmm... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2

      I can imagine the scene in Tehran when Iran's diplomats return to give the good news to the Supreme Obsessive Compulsive. In North Korea they found a country led by a man whose dad invented electricity and basketball. How can they fail when allied to such genius?

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    28. Re:Hmm... by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      This platform seems a bit weak. When will America finally have a party whose members work to outlaw abortion, reduce access to contraception, deny gay marriage, and shoe-horn religion in to the science classroom?

      Why don't you get busy then and let us know how it turns out? That mix won't really work for the Republicans since there doesn't seem to be any real interest in having the US government block access to contraception, only not have the Federal government pay for it, which it hasn't done much of anyway. There is practically nothing to deny in terms of so called "gay marriage" since same sex couples haven't ever been able to marry in the vast majority of the United States, and that is mainly a state level issue. There is already a Federal law that prohibits the Federal government from recognizing same sex marriages performed in the small hand full of states that have been forced to permit it. Classroom curriculum is a state level matter, not Federal level, so that makes no sense. It is unlikely that abortion will ever really be outlawed due to Roe v. Wade. However, there are sensible regulations that could be enacted, such as requiring abortion providers to meet ordinary standards of medical sanitation, which seems to be a problem for some of them.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    29. Re:Hmm... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You seem interested in making a political point because you've:

      a) compared defense spending to the completely unrelated health-care spending
      b) cited a cherry-picked number for defense spending from a heavily partisan source that is way out of sync with what the CBO reports

      The CBO's numbers for 2010 show defense and medicare/medicaid being roughly equal at 20% and 23% of the budget respectively.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2010.svg

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    30. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that would change anything how? The Reps are claiming Obama is the Antichrist and the Dems are calling all the Reps a bunch of Knuckle Draggers and Mouth Breathers.

      He is and they are.

      Although to be fair that has much more to do with them being from the US than it has to do with their politics.

    31. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we've always been at war with Eurasia...

    32. Re:Hmm... by ericartman · · Score: 2

      Perfect, I'm reading the same thing I'm thinking on /. I need to see a doctor.

    33. Re:Hmm... by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      This is even funnier to me when you add in the concept of our Germans being better then their Germans, al la cold war missle development. After every catastrophioc failure or political snafu the catch phrase could be, "Well, at least we all hate the Jews!"

    34. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok....

      So the US revolution didn't actually have anything to do with Britains actions- the colonists just got pissy and wanted to start some shit? We can't look for social or political reasons because of the amount of independent minds involved?

      The US entry into WWII had nothing to do Pearl Harbour, Japanese militarization or the current Pres. being a fan of Europe? It was just because all those independent minds were after a good fight?

      All that 'ancient history' (in your case apparently anything over 10 years ago has no effect on the mindsets of entire populations?!) has shit-all to do with how people think and behave? It has nothing to do fostering feelings of mistreatment? Maybe you ought to leave the fat, comfortable confines of McUSA sometime pal - the world is filled with ancient scars being used as excuses, I will grant you that (though their age matters little, when the same parallels can be drawn now, see Northern Ireland for example) - but it is also full of people that have been crapped on from a great height within actual living memory, and those memories colour every aspect of their lives.

      I know what you're trying to say - it's bollocks, but I understand it. If you came from a different country - one that hasn't enjoyed 50+ years of being a superpower - one that is powerless to the whims and fancies of a larger, brutish nation such as your own - then maybe, just maybe you would understand why the actions of that larger nation matter so much, and how much that can effect your own small life.

    35. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bellicose

      Do you not know where to find a fucking thesaurus? Fuck.

    36. Re:Hmm... by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      Sure, its unfortunate our enemies have strengthened ties with one another, but my first thought on hearing the news was this comic:
      http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2003/12/05

      --
      For great justice.
    37. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's the Soviets who are to blame!

    38. Re:Hmm... by dintech · · Score: 1

      Definitely them too.

  3. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yawn.

  4. This is a very bad thing by maxbash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You think 1930s Germany and Italy working together was bad. This totally freaks me out.

    1. Re:This is a very bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. Two of the very worst cases of extremist idiocracies that actually have a bit of weight in their pants, teamed up. Nothing good will come of this.

    2. Re:This is a very bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is not similar - at all - to the Axis. The Axis were the attackers, whereas the Best Korea and Iran are defending. There's nothing wrong with forming an alliance to defend against a common enemy, and defending from computer threats should worry no one (well, no one but the malware writers, anyway).

      What really surprises me is that the Best Korea has computers. I always thought the Great Leader himself did all the computation on his head and telepathically sent the output to trillions of Best Koreans.

    3. Re:This is a very bad thing by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      You think 1930s Germany and Italy working together was bad.

      To a pretty close first approximation, "Germany and Italy working together" = "Germany".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:This is a very bad thing by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Two of the very worst cases of extremist idiocracies that actually have a bit of weight in their pants

      In the front of their pants, or the back?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:This is a very bad thing by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

      More like Israel and South Africa working together to build nuclear weapons back in the 1970s.

    6. Re:This is a very bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These two were named as part of the Axis of Evil. Forget Nazis and Fascists. They're in league with the Legion of Doom.

    7. Re:This is a very bad thing by Genda · · Score: 2

      The back of the pants was Italy, the front of the pants was Germany, and they had to bring Japan in to provide the reach around... and now you have the complete "Axis Powers as Gay Porn, Analogy".

    8. Re:This is a very bad thing by Genda · · Score: 1

      North Korea has a nuke but no delivery. The current plan is call South Korea for Korean Barbeque take out and tip the delivery boy with a nuke and detonate it after he crosses the border. Iran has missiles but no nuke. It wants to drop a warhead into the middle of Tel Aviv that opens up and shout "Psych!!!!" Together, they bother me. They are both incredibly inept, but they bother me. What do they say "Even the blind squirrel occasionally find a nut..." We need to play these bozos off one another hard. Its time for a little political intrigue and social engineering.

    9. Re:This is a very bad thing by bmo · · Score: 2

      When you have two stupid people, they don't add up to one smart person. Two people with an IQ of 75 does not add up to 150. Consider that IQ is actually a percentage where 100=100 percent or 1. For typical meetings of people who have above average IQ, this increases the total IQ by multiplication. When you combine two stupid people you also multiply their IQs, but since their individual IQs are less than unity, the IQ of the system drops. For example: if two people meet and they both have an IQ of 75, the combined IQs of two people is .56, with one of them saying "Hold my beer" and "watch this."

      Combining Iran and North Korea does not get you pre-war Nazi Germany. What it gets, I'm not sure, but whatever it is, it ain't smart.

      --
      BMO

      P.S. Business meetings do not follow the above rule. A business meeting is always as dumb as the dumbest person there at a maximum.

      P.P.S: I have not yet factored in what is called "retard strength" - you may make your own assumptions about this.

    10. Re:This is a very bad thing by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Two incredibly stupid people, with desires of godhood or their desires for destruction on their mind. Are just as dangerous as two smart people with the desires bent on world domination. The difference between the two is luck, funding and skill. Luck, can make the first succeed, and cripple the second. Either because the first is getting "help" from the outside, and because the second because someone is working against them.

      If you combine them, you might not get pre-war nazi-germany. What you might get is cambodia with nuclear tech, or per-aparthied south africa. And if you're blind enough to think that neither of them was a threat, you're simply fooling yourself.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:This is a very bad thing by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You think 1930s Germany and Italy working together was bad. This totally freaks me out.

      Since they were already working together on long range missiles, and apparently on nuclear weapons technology, I wouldn't get too excited about them working together on software.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    12. Re:This is a very bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh puhleaze! Iran is an authoritarian theocracy, not an idiocracy. They have no intent of dropping a nuke on anyone because they have no delusions about what would follow. But they sure would like to be able to threaten it as retaliation, they saw what happened to Iraq which had no such capabilities.

      All that baloney about wanting to wipe out israel is pure sabre-rattling - no major islamic sect, and that includes the shites in Iran, believe in a doomsday or other apocalyptic end times scenario. Guess who does believe in that crap? Evangelical christians of the Pat Robertson variety.

      Assuming that the people who have been running one of the most advanced countries in the middle-east for over 30 years now are apocalyptically self-destructive is just a way to avoid a rational examination of the situation. Its great advertising for the war-mongers and their money-men though.

    13. Re:This is a very bad thing by dintech · · Score: 1

      Also remember that they are, in state personality terms, reckless, selfish, opinionated and generally uncooperative. When you put two argumentative basket cases in the same room, you can be sure there are going to be some disagreements.

    14. Re:This is a very bad thing by bmo · · Score: 2

      I have a question for you, then.

      How many 19 year-olds do you want to throw at the problem?

      --
      BMO

    15. Re:This is a very bad thing by Genda · · Score: 1

      I'd feel a whole lot better about you statement if a whole bunch of guys who blew themselves up in the name of their warm and fuzzy gawd didn't come straight from Iran. The bozo quotient is just a wee bit high to give me any sense of complacency.

  5. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think it was any better as a kid, you might want to quit huffing aerosol products long enough for a near-past history lesson.

    The only difference was it was much harder to find out about this kind of stuff in the past, and when you did it was often because journalists or whistleblowers put their career or life on the line to do so (not that that part is necessarily any different, just that the information can be disseminated without them HAVING to. Now whether it's credible without an acknowledged source is another matter.

  6. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you hate the US so much why are you using one of it's greatest achievements? (the internet)

  7. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Get your popcorn. It's time to be reminded Americans are all fat and lazy warmongering idiots, are responsible for every single hardship, and are so biased and place every other nations in stereotypes. But it's okay, /all/ Americans are like that.

  8. Re:Oh, the Irony by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 0

    I hate the Nazi's too, but I (and I believe you) do enjoy some of their greatest accomplishments. In others words, there is nothing wrong with using someone's greatest accomplishments and at the time condemning them for their worst accomplishments.

  9. Oh shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Blunder Team has clawed its way out of Hell and it's coming for you, USA

  10. Where does North Korea get its computers from? by fufufang · · Score: 2

    Considering all the trade and economical sanction, and the collapsed economy, where does North Korea get its computers from? People in that country are starving, and they cannot afford computers. That reduces the talent pool for the malware defence team. Also I don't think communism ethos is compatible with hacker culture, so the people who get to use computers are as thick as wooden planks...

    1. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering all the trade and economical sanction, and the collapsed economy, where does North Korea get its computers from?

      Well up until recently, Kim Jung Il designed and built them all himself.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Considering all the trade and economical sanction, and the collapsed economy, where does North Korea get its computers from? People in that country are starving, and they cannot afford computers. That reduces the talent pool for the malware defence team. Also I don't think communism ethos is compatible with hacker culture, so the people who get to use computers are as thick as wooden planks...

      Sanctions are disproportionately passed on to the little guy, after the Glorious Leader and his military get their cut of whatever's left.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

      where does North Korea get its computers from?

      Probably from the same place they got their nuclear technology: our dear friend and ally Pakistan.

    4. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the same place they get everything else: China.

    5. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      They get them from China. The elite are very well off, it's very similar as to how it was in the USSR. The peasants are broke, poor, and downtrodden, but the elites? You know, they get a pat on the head and a few hours of luxury. And if you're in the inner circle, you get even more privileges.

      Don't worry though, through years of careful brainwashing they teach that the western world is out to "steal" their(n.korean) paradise.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Considering all the trade and economical sanction, and the collapsed economy, where does North Korea get its computers from?

      Up until recently, I don't know... however, I can guess that they'll mostly get them from Iran from now on.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    7. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by fnj · · Score: 2

      From the same place they get everything else: China.

      You mean, from the same place everybody gets everything: China.

    8. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering all the trade and economical sanction, and the collapsed economy, where does North Korea get its computers from?

      Probably the Chinese landfills where most of our 3-year old computers end up.

    9. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by kawabago · · Score: 1

      Now KIm just throws them down from heaven. Keep looking up!

    10. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought trickle down economics was a western thing.

    11. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The peasants are broke, poor, and downtrodden, but the elites?

      Um yeah you heard this where? People were not wealthy in the USSR, but the vast majority was actually quite a bit better off than they are now. They were not "broke, poor, and downtrodden". I'm not defending the authoritarianism of the Soviet government but it is a fact that people were better off.

    12. Re:Where does North Korea get its computers from? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      So who gives Israel their... nukes (?)

      Not who you think, but that was over 40 years ago.

      Who mess up the middle east in the first place?

      Muhammad, when he failed to pick his own successor before he died.

      Who's alright supporting anyone as long as it fits the current agenda?

      Everyone, everywhere, forever.

  11. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of curiosity: which Nazi innovations am I using right now?

  12. Re:Oh, the Irony by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0

    If you hate the US so much why are you using one of it's greatest achievements? (the internet)

    The internet??? I thought you were talking about Slashdot.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  13. Re:Oh, the Irony by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Launch vehicles, if you use any satellite tech at all. Also some medical experiments could be added to the list of Nazi tech we all use every day.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. in other words by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    the enemy of my enemy is my friend who has a BSOD just like mine

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  15. Re:Oh, the Irony by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Out of curiosity: which Nazi innovations am I using right now?

    I'm pretty sure they made up the word "Nazi", which you just used.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  16. Re:Oh, the Irony by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

    I am actually hoping that it is impossible for Nazi Germany to have not contributed to something every person uses today. Of the top my head, I am thinking Rockets (and technology build over it), I remember magnetic tape (audio tape), turbine engines, microwave cooking, some medicines (sorry I dont have names or sources).

  17. FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, to be a fly on the wall when those two get together one weekend to install FreeBSD for the first time.

    1. Re:FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't they be more likely to install OppressionBSD? [ducks]

  18. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A lot of medical advancements were to do Nazi studies that could never be done with modern medical ethics. One example is hyperthermia, they would put prisoners in ice water then put then outside in the cold and monitor their body stats. In the process, they learned to revive someone in such a state.

    Many of them are covered while I was in med school, at least they were when I went ('00-'04), with big disclaimers of course. No one likes using the info because of the way it was acquired, but there is no current safe, ethical, way to do many of them and the info is too valuable.

  19. the military industrial complex is evil by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but this does not mean that enemies are just made up hoaxes

    the venom from north korea and iran is real. just ask a japanese, or a syrian

    this is where you lecture me on how these are peace loving harmless countries that have been turned into monsters, just to slake a thirst to spend money by an industrial complex in the usa

    you know, there are actually real breathing human beings in north korea and iran who think and have their own ideas, completely of their own will and independent volition. some of their ideas come from concepts they dearly believe that are older than the united states' existence. not just cardboard cut out reflections of some western propaganda from decades ago from a dead cold war era. maybe you should conceptionalize the fantasty that there exists real people outside the usa with their own agenda that did not start in washington dc

    some of them have agendas that carry some malice for peace on this earth, not just malice for the economies of the west. what they believe and think is their own original creation, and may require defeat on a battlefield

    i say that not because i love drinking oil from the skulls of dead children, or whatever nonsense you believe about someone like myself who would say such a thing, but because i understand, unlike you, that menace does not only flow from one place in the world, and the usa is not the only country with a military industrial complex

    in fact, if you want to see the most complete representation of the idea of a military industrial complex controlling a country in all avenues of power, try pyongyang. tehran, not so much, but the revolutionary guard there is trying its best to defang the mullahs and be more of a direct military industrial complex dominating a country, just like pyongyang

    so if you oppose the idea of the military industrial complex, you oppose north korea. unless your supposed principles are not so much real principles, just a thin veneer for the same old tired tribalism of hating a country or nationality such as the usa just out of the same old tired empty chest thumping avarice you believe you are above somehow?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the military industrial complex is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the venom from north korea and iran is real. just ask a japanese, or a syrian

      Uh, Syria and Iran are great friends, and contrary to the very scripted one-sided narriative you've been receiving on what's happening there, most people support the Syrian government and are fighting against the coup that Israel and the US are funding there (and training jihadists on the Turkish border).
      We didn't learn our lessons from Afghanistan when training jihadists to fight us. Guaranteed, there will be blow back any time they are recruited.

    2. Re:the military industrial complex is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Syria and Iran are great friends, and contrary to the very scripted one-sided narriative you've been receiving on what's happening there, most people support the Syrian government and are fighting against the coup that Israel and the US are funding there (and training jihadists on the Turkish border).

      [citation needed]

    3. Re:the military industrial complex is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i say that not because i love drinking oil from the skulls of dead children

      ... So you do admit that you love drinking oil from the skulls of dead children?

  20. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The first programmable computer was created in Nazi Germany, and so was the first inflatable doll. Considering you're here, there's a good chance you're using both right now.

    Germany's innovations during the war were amazing. They had many advances the Allies couldn't dream of (like night vision, for instance, and there were a few battles were they used tanks while their adversary had horses)... Point is, technology isn't everything, and there's nothing wrong in admitting someone evil did something that helped humanity - it doesn't make them a better person, what matters for that is their intention.

  21. Breaking Nazi crypto by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And if it weren't for trying to break Nazi crypto, the Allies probably wouldn't have invented computers as we know them.

    1. Re:Breaking Nazi crypto by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      And if it weren't for trying to break Nazi crypto, the Allies probably wouldn't have invented computers as we know them.

      Are you saying that the Nazi's are responsible for Windows?

    2. Re:Breaking Nazi crypto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it weren't for trying to break Nazi crypto, the Allies probably wouldn't have invented computers as we know them.

      Are you saying that the Nazi's are responsible for Windows?

      He is obviously saying that Apple was created by the Nazi's.

  22. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod UP!

  23. this is not a godwin by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    he didn't they and they didn't because someone, somewhere, opposed them. their visions were not fulfilled because they were not in an environment of no effective opposition, like, say 1930s economically devastated germany

    so: do you think the cliques in power in tehran and north korea should be opposed? if not, why not?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so: do you think the cliques in power in tehran and north korea should be opposed? if not, why not?...

      Oh, so NOW you want to shed blood? But not to protect our civil rights? do you know how bloody and how much suffering there is in that?

      Yes, you are a stupid war pig! Thank you for proving it to us all.

    2. Re:this is not a godwin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      so: do you think the cliques in power in tehran and north korea should be opposed? if not, why not?

      They should be opposed with a level of effort equal to their level of threat - not their level of venom.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:this is not a godwin by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      You seem hung up on my word choice. I also question your judgment of what constitutes a threat. Regardless, we're just talking about malware here and you do agree a threat should be opposed and I can't fathom that you would think malware is provocative, so we're in the same ballpark at least.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:this is not a godwin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You seem hung up on my word choice.

      Your word choice is a nice compact version of how the "cyberwar" threat has been sold. I've been watching the PR on this stuff for years, and you do a fantastic job of mirroring the worst of it, non-sequitors and all. I criticize your word choice because it is the unpolished version of the script the vested interests use.

      I also question your judgment of what constitutes a threat.

      You are hysterical, not haha hysterical, but completely irrational-evalution-of-the-threat hysterical. All black and white thinking about how any threat is too big of a threat.

      we're just talking about malware here

      Yeah, that's all we are talking about here. Just a little virus, deletes some mp3s, spies on your bank account, no biggee. Just ask Japan, right? I guess you did add a new non-sequitur to the standard narrative after all.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:this is not a godwin by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      I am not required to be a warmongerer to make a laughingstock out of someone who sees no threats from North Korea or Iran. Does one need a PhD in google search to review the recent history of those country's statements and actions? what is the magic exactly whereby you are convinced of the harmlessness of these countriesdespite the evidence of statements of intent and actions to obtain Capacity to fulfill intent?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    6. Re:this is not a godwin by 517714 · · Score: 2

      Thanks for pointing to the earlier post, now we know he DOES have a shift key. Is there a way to filter e. e. cummings fanbois?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    7. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so: do you think the cliques in power in tehran and north korea should be opposed? if not, why not?...

      Oh, so NOW you want to shed blood? But not to protect our civil rights? do you know how bloody and how much suffering there is in that?

      Yes, you are a stupid war pig! Thank you for proving it to us all.

      We're still waiting for an actual answer to the question.
      And just FYI, sitting down and having a rational debate is the exact opposite of going to war. However, calling people names when asked a question and refusing to discuss it is as close to being a "war pig" as you can get without actually shooting somebody.

    8. Re:this is not a godwin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      what is the magic exactly whereby you are convinced of the harmlessness of these countriesdespite the evidence of statements of intent and actions to obtain Capacity to fulfill intent?

      Statements? There you go again with the same baloney as "venom." Utterly meaningless when assesing risk.

      As for actual capacity - your hand waving at google is not a citation. The best north korea has been able to do is launch missiles that fall apart long before they reach japan. Iran isn't much better, their missiles could probably hit Athens on a good day.

      Oh wait, this about "malware" well, there is ZERO evidence of either country producing malware of any significant threat. Nada. Zip.

      Hysterical. This time in the you-made-a-laughingstock-out-of-yourself way.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:this is not a godwin by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      As for actual capacity - your hand waving at google is not a citation.

      i'm not going to cite anything. i'm not your father. this is not an obscure discussion on little known facts. if you require an education on the obvious points of discussion, you shouldn't be in the discussion. there has been nothing but a drumbeat of attacks, deaths, abducitions, and bellicose language for decades. if you don't know that, why are you talking about this subject and registering an uninformed opinion?

      The best north korea has been able to do is launch missiles that fall apart long before they reach japan. Iran isn't much better, their missiles could probably hit Athens on a good day.

      the point is, they are building and launching these missiles and bombs and constantly engage in bellicose talk! it means nothing to you?

      they've been doing this for decades, meaning rational behavior isn't the point. that makes them a threat: they are constantly prepping for war and they are unstable. one is a theocracy, the other is cult of personality for a twenty something. they are highly militarized, going nuclear, and constantly talking about annihilating neighbors. this means nothing to you?

      if a neighbor constantly stockpiled guns, and constantly threatened to shoot his neighbors, do you call the cops? or dismiss him as a harmless kook?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:this is not a godwin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      i'm not going to cite anything.

      Lolz. Such obvious points of discussion that you can't even name one much less provide a citation, huh?

      if you don't know that, why are you talking about this subject and registering an uninformed opinion?

      I'm confident you are the one with an uninformed opinion in this debate, vastly uninformed. The last couple of taepodong launches kept me pretty busy.

      the point is, they are building and launching these missiles and bombs and constantly engage in bellicose talk! it means nothing to you?

      they've been doing this for decades

      Like you just wrote, they've been doing it for decades and the actual results have been what? A couple of south korean boats getting sunk. A couple of kidnappings of south koreans and japanese. Obviously we need to spend billions combating the clear and present 'cyberthreat' from these fiends.

      if a neighbor constantly stockpiled guns, and constantly threatened to shoot his neighbors, do you call the cops? or dismiss him as a harmless kook?

      Neither of these countries are our neighbors. It is amazing how well you parrot the non-sequiturs of the war pigs.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:this is not a godwin by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      Lolz. Such obvious points of discussion that you can't even name one much less provide a citation, huh?

      i stopped reading there and will read you no more. these are countries hypermilitarizing and issuing bellicose language for decades. they don't act rationally, and their capacity to do harm is sufficient to cause a major disruption that theatens our national interests. to say this requires no citation for anyone with the slightest inclination to know the remotest facts of this subject matter

      please be honestly interested in being educated on the simplest baseline of facts of a subject matter before speaking in the future. thanks

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    12. Re:this is not a godwin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      to say this requires no citation for anyone with the slightest inclination to know the remotest facts of this subject matter

      Hallmark of the fool - claiming something is so obvious it doesn't need to be proven in the face of "reason." You are the one advocating bellicosity and hypermilitizing here - after years of seeing you do it on slashdot I think it is time we took your advocacy to heart and launched a pre-emptive cyberattack on you.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't act rationally, and their capacity to do harm is sufficient to cause a major disruption that theatens our national interests.

      I think you've just shown that you're an armchair quarterback and not someone who is really versed in the politics of Iran or North Korea.
      By claiming the countries are not rational, you're relying on theories of political science that make assumption which do not hold for North Korea or Iran.
      So in that sense, neither of them are acting rationally, but their actions are rational within the framework they've constructed for themselves.

      To be clear: Iran and North Korea are acting perfectly rationally, if you understand their motivations.
      Mostly their leaders care about security of the country and the continuity of the government.
      They both engage in patterns of conduct that are internally consistent in the pursuit of these long term goals.

      Both countries constantly threaten to shoot their neighbors and then... they don't!
      They play a game of brinkmanship in order to extract concessions, then they quiet down for a while.

      Don't get me wrong, both countries are a threat to American interests, but to call them irrational is wrong.
      Both countries are rational, they just do not care about the same things you do.

    14. Re:this is not a godwin by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Neither of these countries are our neighbors. It is amazing how well you parrot the non-sequiturs of the war pigs.

      They are neighbours of allies of the US. And of most of the western world. Japan is pretty important to the world's economy, as is South Korea, and nearer to Iran: Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE and Pakistan are all on their immediate border, and they're close enough to make things difficult for India, Israel, Jordan, Russia and Egypt (not even mentioning Afghanistan and Iraq, both of which share a border with Iran). These are not exactly countries that we want going to war. Quite aside from that, China has a defense pact with North Korea... so that's four admitted nuclear powers, and one that won't admit it but everybody knows they have nukes, all within range of Iran and North Korea, not to mention countries that form part of NATO, with whom the US has mutual defense treaties.

      I'm a tree-hugging dirt-worshipping peacenik hippie, but I still think it's naive to simply dismiss these two countries. If they want to, they can make things very difficult for the west by targetting our allies.

    15. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the magic exactly whereby you are convinced of the harmlessness of these countriesdespite the evidence of statements of intent and actions to obtain Capacity to fulfill intent?

      The 'magic' is called enough critical thought to recognise big-balled rhetoric when we see it.

      We have been wrong at least once recently however - some of us never actually thought the short monkey-looking one would actually launch not 1, but 2 wars over such fucking obvious lies, but he showed us just how daft you can be when in charge of a massive fucking army.

      However the other shite-spewing arse-heads in charge of war loving countries don't have quite the same level of power, and most of them are currently more afraid of internal revolutions than they are of external powers (though there is some evidence to suggest those two aren't all that disconnected).

      They've all been talking big for years (decades in some cases) but doing fuck all really - despite the opportunities aplenty - all except for a few of the big ones, mostly with acronyms that start with a U...

    16. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've dealt with this fool many times before. He's a troll, not interested in anything you could call 'rational'.

    17. Re:this is not a godwin by cjsm · · Score: 1

      these are countries hypermilitarizing and issuing bellicose language for decades

      Thank God the U.S. hasn't hyper-militarized or used bellicose language for decades (rolls eyes). The problem you don't see is the U.S. has done far more evil in the world than North Korea or Iran combined. Of course, when the U.S. kills millions of people, its only for the most saintly reasons.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    18. Re:this is not a godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still waiting for an actual answer to the question.

      Wait no more:
      Of course I'm poosed to the cliques in power in tehran and north korea...

      I'm also opposed to the same in Israel, Saudi Arabia*, UK, USA, Japan, and countless other places.

      * I bet they have nukes there also, and I consider them more dangerous than Iran. Don't forget where OBL and his friends come from. They didn't come from Iran, OR North Korea.

      Happy?

  24. Who's surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the two countries have common enemies and aligned goals.

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Why are the US and UK so surprised? In 1941 the USA declared Communism (and Russia) an enemy of the state. In WW2 they used the Russian infantry for most of ground-combat against the Nazis.

    1. Re:Who's surprised by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Osama and Saddam was all ok until they was not to. Right?

  25. All because they use American Computer software... by msevior · · Score: 2

    It's all pretty funny really. They have malware because they're heavy uses of American Software. ie They NEED their hated enemy to make their software.

  26. Re:Oh, the Irony by zill · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't forget about grammar.

    Anytime you done wrote a complete sentence with proper grammar means the grammar Nazis have won.

  27. Worth a laugh by fnj · · Score: 1

    This is like two clinically brain damaged boxers, one with delusions of grandeur, the other with terminal paranoia, both apoplectic with grotesque rage, each reeling and barely able to stand, stammering and slurring the simplest verbalizations, unable to sign their own names or feed themselves, hands shaking so badly they can't wee on their own without soaking the whole bathroom, bumping gloves and (attempting to unsteadily) stand together, thinking "NOW we'll show the bastards!".

    I doubt this is going to strike fear into the champ. Might make him determined to really stomp both of them the next time all three enter the ring, though.

    1. Re:Worth a laugh by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Seriously. They don't speak the same language, they don't look the same, their cultures are both extraordinarily xenophobic, and both of them are perceived on the world stage to be technologically incompetent. In Iran, the education system was there, but it's being rapidly dismantled, and anyway the mullahs make sure Iranians who learn things aren't allowed to do anything with what they learn, and North Korea is, well, a collection of peasants.

      Punchdrunk boxers indeed.

  28. New antivirus software industry in Iran, DPRK? by acidradio · · Score: 2

    I could see an ironic twist to all of this. Iran and North Korea could end up pooling all of their resources and make really cutting-edge antivirus and antimalware software. We've seen other countries put government money behind a problem (ie. Japan funded research to make better car factories) and solve it in this way. And when Iran and North Korea make this wonderful new software the rest of the world might just line up to to buy it. Who knows what else they will innovate. We could be creating a monster here!

    1. Re:New antivirus software industry in Iran, DPRK? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      In one corner, the defenders Iran and North Korea, stubborn to the end and willing to die for the cause...

      In the other corner, all the resources of the west including but not limited to the NSA, the Israelis and Microsoft itself, willing to do anything to win...

      I know where I'd put my bet.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    2. Re:New antivirus software industry in Iran, DPRK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People said the same about the Taliban - "bunch of muppets with out-dated weapons and a complete lack of technology beyond jeeps. Won't take more than a few months for US/UK soldiers (best training in the world etc. etc.) to root them out..."

      They were bloody wrong though weren't they? Not only are they still putting up resistance - but they achieved a couple of wins that were fairly embarrassing for us - a fairly recent prison break is one good example.

      I don't really think Iran and NK are going to manage quite the same level of surprise with their Malware divisions - but to underestimate them completely is to practically invite such an embarrassing incident to occur. Better to hold realistic expectations based on actual intelligence - but this may be asking too much of any of us....

  29. i thought we were talking about malware by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the topic of the fucking story you are posting under?

    where did i say anything about shedding blood asshole? i said OPPOSE. what does the verb "oppose" mean nitwit?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i thought we were talking about malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does the verb "oppose" mean nitwit?

      It's code, for WAR! Don't try to hide it. You want war. You want to attack Syria, and you want to attack Iran. You are a bloodthirsty troll. Just admit it, and move on. Be proud of what you are.

  30. Open Doors by Boronx · · Score: 1

    This will probably make their cyber defense efforts easier to infiltrate.

  31. Oh no by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    It's the Axis of e-Evil.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  32. Re:Oh, the Irony by Genda · · Score: 2

    Yes, AC, of course... I know I shouldn't, but just a wee snack. As an American, I'm not very proud of the stupid things my government has done, for... oh, let's say the last 12 years or so. I voted against all of it, as did most of my friends, but its my country and I feel responsible when it screws up, even when it did it against my wishes or blessing (I'm guessing parents must feel this way about wayward children.)

    That doesn't make America a bad place or Americans evil (well not all of us :-) There is plenty of dirty rotten to go around and some of the dirtiest and most rotten is coming from large monied interests in Western and Central Europe. The Saudis have been exporting the worst kind of Islamic poison for decades now. China has always been one of the top manufacturers of the most viscous weapons for international sale including mines designed to look like toys that children bring home and then explode killing the entire family. Like I said, there's plenty of rotten to go around. Fact is, wherever you find money grubbing, greedy, grind babies up for a buck scumbags, you find the kind of nasty I'm talking about, and sadly this in not a conversation limited by geography. There is sadly an abundance of human toxic waste on this planet and my guess is that I could find a couple examples of such talking with the same accent speak with, so hate America all you want, just remember, that we haven't got anything resembling a corner on the market of evil fscks.

  33. Re:Oh, the Irony by Genda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, if you're doing anything that involves a satellite, there's some Nazi tech. Your country is holding back the dogs of war with nukes that contain Nazi tech. If you ever did anything that involved hypothermia, you have Dr. Mengele to thank, of course he got that very useful information by freezing hundred of Jews to death, which while useful makes it one of the hardest won pieces of medical information ever collected and forever Mengele a scumbag of monumental proportions.

    In fact the Nazis were brilliant engineers and there are literally thousands of improvements in motors, cars, trains, heavy machinery, factories and engineering and applied sciences that are a permanent part of everything we do. That doesn't mean they weren't barbaric. It does mean that they produced some amazing technology in the headlong race to self destruction. Hmmmm, sound at all familiar?

  34. Re:Oh, the Irony by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

    I wish I had not posted in this thread. I would mod both of your posts up if I could. Excellent points.

  35. Bullshit. by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are they possibly going to do? They are outgunned in every respect - technologically, economically, and militarily by everyone who won't put up with their shit. Pre-WWII Germany had built itself back up to a manufacturing and academic (well, before they chased out the jewish PhDs) powerhouse. Meanwhile we've got the Mullahs afraid that people might actually learn things while at university and a North Korean populace that is reduced to eating grass every 10 years or so. Comparing Iran and North Korea to pre-war Nazi Germany doesn't even pass the belly laugh test.

    Did you even see the ludicrous North Korean attempt at a supposed satellite launch? What about the photoshopped missile launch test from Iran?

    Compare and contrast to the years between WWII and Yeltsin shelling Parliament when I would see maps in the Providence Journal of what would happen if a nuclear warhead detonated over Quonset Point Naval Air Station - an actual, credible, threat. That's what gets me about this "war on terrorism" and "axis of evil" bullshit which chews up trillions of dollars and ruins soldiers' lives for few actual results over imaginary threats to the US. We're supposed to soil our underwear over some technologically backwards regimes who don't even have actual long-range missiles and their medium range missiles leave much to be desired?

    You want cyberwar? How about "accidentally" "dragging an anchor" over an undersea cable in the Persian Gulf or off the coast of North Korea? Because that's what our response is going to be if Iran and North Korea become offensive with malware botnets and they can do fuck-all about it. It's not like it hasn't happened before.

    Threat? Please.

    What fucking threat?

    The people playing up this "threat" of Iran and North Korea are a bunch of pants-wetters and chickenhawks with only one thing in mind - making money off the unjustified fear and advancing the ideologies of PNAC and FPI banging the drums for boots-on-the-ground war with Iran and probably NK. Dan Senor isn't exactly a "potted plant" to take a term from Ollie North's lawyer.

    Oh yeah, and guess who Dan Senor works for?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Bullshit. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      somebody who constantly militarizes and issues bellicose language for decades isn't someone you look at for the idea of rational self-restraint

      if north korea randomly sinks a ship or shells an island, as it has done in the last few years, killing dozens of south koreans, you could ask why, but the answer is simply: who knows? the problem is that therefore you can't depend upon them for anything rational or stable. they'll launch a missile at tokyo tomorrow. why? who knows?

      then there is another argument you have: that even with all their menace, they are harmless idiots: their missile won't hit tokyo, their tech doesn't work. we can counter their tech easily and effectively. well, this depends upon the notion that they are hapless fuck ups. they did create a nuclear bomb. i'm certain the idiots in charge are idiots, but they have intelligent engineers. the question then is just one of time: they keep militarizing and steeping their people in bellicose propaganda. to what end? does it sound like a stable situation to you? we've been waiting for these idiots to self-implode. for decades. it's not happening

      there is an end game here. it involves a screw up that crosses a line. it's just that, when iran or north korea screw up, it may cost someone in tokyo or aleppo way, way, way too much. a cost that our children might scratch their heads: "they stockpiled weapons for years, constantly threatened to kill their neighbors, and no one did anything about them until disaster {XYZ}? i don't get it"

      there's an argument for nipping the problem in the bud before the mistake happens. an unstable idiot with a gun is a problem. no matter how faulty the gun or how many cops are standing around him

      of course, if we attacked north korea, they have so much artillery pointed at seoul they would level it in no time. so i'm not arguing for preemptive war. their trump card really is their insane bellicosity. this is where someone says we pushed them to that. really? the west is a monster whose only proper response is constant war preparation? hey brazil, philippines, india: you better start frothing at the mouth and militarizing like no tomorrow, and threatening to annihilate your neighbors constantly! why?: because the west! pfffffft: the constant war preparation is the fault of iran and north korea only. this is the path they chose

      i'm just arguing that people who say they have no menace, that they represent no threat, are wrong. the situation is unstable and has the markings of something that ends badly. not that we should attack the countries, just that you are wrong that this kind of thing just goes away on its own or that they never succeed in having the capacity to do real harm, or that they never strike for no rational reason

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Bullshit. by bmo · · Score: 2

      there's an argument for nipping the problem in the bud before the mistake happens. an unstable idiot with a gun is a problem. no matter how faulty the gun or how many cops are standing around him

      There is an argument, but the argument needs to be tempered with "how many lives is this going to cost us nipping it in the bud?" Because you *know* that an actual invasion over the DMZ or by sea means that everything stationed by NK behind the DMZ gets launched.

      Diplomacy has worked over the past decades, because it has prevented war that would have levelled Seoul, because we know that they know that crossing the DMZ means cruise missile strikes on all thier SAM bases and then tons of bombs from BUFs. As crazy as you think the North Koreans are, there is a method to their madness.

      And MAD still exists. Except that it's not mutual, it's simply assured destruction by us of anyone who uses a nuke against us, even if all they have is one.

      just that you are wrong that this kind of thing just goes away on its own

      No. It doesn't go away on its own. That's what diplomacy is for. If you resort to invasion it means that you have failed.

      Your mistake is that you think diplomacy is "doing nothing." It's not.

      What frightens me is the assholes from PNAC and FPI who are advising Romney are pushing for an interventionist "strike first, ask questions later" military policy. An Imperial America, if you will. It's not like these guys are hiding it.

      Read from their own mouths:

      http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/about/ - the current Neocon philosophy on foreign policy and the military.

      http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm - The predecessor for the above.

      http://www.mittromney.com/collection/foreign-policy - Mitt Romney's official stance on the "American Century" (he did not pick this title by accident).

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romney-taps-foreign-policy-national-security-advisers/2011/10/06/gIQAnDHzPL_story.html - the article describing who is on Mitt's staff.

      http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/about/staff - Listing of staff at FPI.

      Please notice the similarity of individuals at both think-tanks and who is staffing Mitt's foreign policy jobs, and the similarities in philosophy all of the above is.

      Taken as a totality, it is frightening, because it basically guarantees that we will be at least in a shooting war with Iran if Romney gets elected. They will *insist* he does so.

      --
      BMO

  36. We should be proud by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    that we manage to get an atheist state and a theocracy in bed with one other.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  37. It's more than OS by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    What the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran are most interest on is not about malware

    They are most interested on developing super-sonic anti-ship torpedoes ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval ) which employs Russia's Supercavitation technology ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercavitation )
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:It's more than OS by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      They are most interested on developing super-sonic anti-ship torpedoes

      And they will most certainly succeed, once the North Koreans figure out how to make those pesky factory workers survive for an extended period of time without the luxury goods that the evil Western imperialists call "basic foodstuffs".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:It's more than OS by f3rret · · Score: 1

      What the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran are most interest on is not about malware

      They are most interested on developing super-sonic anti-ship torpedoes ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval ) which employs Russia's Supercavitation technology ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercavitation )

      I think a bunch of Western powers are interested in that. I don't think that one excludes the other. But hey, what do I know, I'm not American.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    3. Re:It's more than OS by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Strange bedfellows indeed. I wonder whether they can reconcile some of their other goals. Like Iran wanting to promote Shia Islam and eliminate all other religions (and atheists/agnostics). And PRK wanting to promote atheism and the cult of the great successor Kim Jong Un and eliminate all religions (including Shia Islam).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:It's more than OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Supercavitating torpedos, yes, supersonic torpedos, no.

    5. Re:It's more than OS by hlavac · · Score: 1

      Iranian plutonium for North korean nukes? Yay!

    6. Re:It's more than OS by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      They are most interested on developing super-sonic anti-ship torpedoes

      Admittedly, I'm only a dabbler in physics, but wouldn't exceeding the speed of sound under water have... "exciting" effects?

    7. Re:It's more than OS by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Plutonium? Last I heard they tried to achieve high purity U235. They wouldn't require all those centrifuges if they wanted to make Pu239. Which raises the question: if you want to build a nuke, why enrich uranium when you can breed plutonium at a fraction of the cost?

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    8. Re:It's more than OS by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      Considering the speed of sound in seawater is something along the lines of 5 times the speed of sound in the atmosphere (note, this is variable in both mediums, and the 5 is in the proper range, and provided only to illustrate the difference in magnitude), that would be one fast torpedo!

    9. Re:It's more than OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, partly because sound moves four times faster under water.

    10. Re:It's more than OS by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Making a functional gun-type U-235 nuclear weapon is a lot easier than making a functional implosion type Pu-239(or U-235) weapon.

  38. Ask Japanese about Korea?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the venom from north korea and iran is real. just ask a japanese ....

     
    Say what??
     
    Ask Japanese about the Koreans?
     
    For Your Information, it was the Japanese who invaded Korea multiple times throughout history
     
    Not the other way around
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Ask Japanese about Korea?? by baKanale · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the GP is referring to North Korean abductions of Japanese citizens, or the time back in 1998 when they launched a missile over Japan.

    2. Re:Ask Japanese about Korea?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so fast... I think he is referring to this Of course this doesn't excuse the war crimes/crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Japanese before and during WWII.

  39. North Korea will share the secret with them by Hentes · · Score: 1

    North Korea has already developed an unbreakable defence against cyber attacks: they don't have internet or computers strong enough to run a modern virus.

    1. Re:North Korea will share the secret with them by dintech · · Score: 1

      Interesting they are implementing exactly that.

  40. PRK passwords... by jimmydigital · · Score: 1

    In related news.. no one was surprised that the master password to the top secret PRK government networks is 1-2-3-4-5. Iran couldn't be reached for comment but was seen to be changing the combinations on all the official state luggage.

    --
    Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
  41. Government & Stealth Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody Seems To Notice and Nobody Seems To Care - Government & Stealth Malware

    In Response To Slashdot Article: Former Pentagon Analyst: China Has Backdoors To 80% of Telecoms 87

    How many rootkits does the US[2] use officially or unofficially?

    How much of the free but proprietary software in the US spies on you?

    Which software would that be?

    Visit any of the top freeware sites in the US, count the number of thousands or millions of downloads of free but proprietary software, much of it works, again on a proprietary Operating System, with files stored or in transit.

    How many free but proprietary programs have you downloaded and scanned entire hard drives, flash drives, and other media? Do you realize you are giving these types of proprietary programs complete access to all of your computer's files on the basis of faith alone?

    If you are an atheist, the comparison is that you believe in code you cannot see to detect and contain malware on the basis of faith! So you do believe in something invisible to you, don't you?

    I'm now going to touch on a subject most anti-malware, commercial or free, developers will DELETE on most of their forums or mailing lists:

    APT malware infecting and remaining in BIOS, on PCI and AGP devices, in firmware, your router (many routers are forced to place backdoors in their firmware for their government) your NIC, and many other devices.

    Where are the commercial or free anti-malware organizations and individual's products which hash and compare in the cloud and scan for malware for these vectors? If you post on mailing lists or forums of most anti-malware organizations about this threat, one of the following actions will apply: your post will be deleted and/or moved to a hard to find or 'deleted/junk posts' forum section, someone or a team of individuals will mock you in various forms 'tin foil hat', 'conspiracy nut', and my favorite, 'where is the proof of these infections?' One only needs to search Google for these threats and they will open your malware world view to a much larger arena of malware on devices not scanned/supported by the scanners from these freeware sites. This point assumed you're using the proprietary Microsoft Windows OS. Now, let's move on to Linux.

    The rootkit scanners for Linux are few and poor. If you're lucky, you'll know how to use chkrootkit (but you can use strings and other tools for analysis) and show the strings of binaries on your installation, but the results are dependent on your capability of deciphering the output and performing further analysis with various tools or in an environment such as Remnux Linux. None of these free scanners scan the earlier mentioned areas of your PC, either! Nor do they detect many of the hundreds of trojans and rootkits easily available on popular websites and the dark/deep web.

    Compromised defenders of Linux will look down their nose at you (unless they are into reverse engineering malware/bad binaries, Google for this and Linux and begin a valuable education!) and respond with a similar tone, if they don't call you a noob or point to verifying/downloading packages in a signed repo/original/secure source or checking hashes, they will jump to conspiracy type labels, ignore you, lock and/or shuffle the thread, or otherwise lead you astray from learning how to examine bad binaries. The world of Linux is funny in this way, and I've been a part of it for many years. The majority of Linux users, like the Windows users, will go out of their way to lead you and say anything other than pointing you to information readily available on detailed binary file analysis.

    Don't let them get you down, the information is plenty and out there, some from some well known publishers of Linux/Unix books. Search, learn, and share the information on detecting and picking through bad binaries. But this still will not touch the void of the APT malware described above which will survive any wipe of r/w media. I'm convinced, on both *nix and Windows, these pieces of APT malware

  42. I don't know nor care what you think by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

    But 2 of the EVILESTEST countries in the WHOLE WORLD corroborating to DEFEND THEMSELVES is provocation enough! The time for talk is over! We need to stop IRAN from threatening the peace of the world. It's too late for invasion, we MUST make IRAN the ultimate sacrifice!

  43. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    They should buy out McAfee. Everyone already hates McAfee so it'd be a perfect fit. By the way, nobody in human history has teamed up to stop malware in any form ever. They'd have to fire all their human employees and get rid of all their computers, lol.

    1. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do that when they have Kaspersky? They've done a damn good job exposing the malware thus far, and since Russia is great friends with Iran, they'll have plenty of help. I support this endeavor.

  44. HaHaHaHaHaHa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HaHaHaHaHaHa

    1. Re:HaHaHaHaHaHa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HuHuhUhUHUHUHUhUhUHuHuHu

  45. People who live in glass houses... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 2

    While I'm all for throwing a monkey wrench in Iran's nuclear program, having used techniques like this legitimizes and raises awareness of them to an extent, and I would suggest that the US may be far more vulnerable to such techniques in the long run. I do wonder if it was a good idea....

  46. Re:All because they use American Computer software by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

    It's all pretty funny really. They have malware because they're heavy uses of American Software. ie They NEED their hated enemy to make their software.

    I dont think they actually need their enemies to make their software, but they use it because it exists and is available.

  47. Speaking as an AV guy, this does not bode well for by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 2

    Hello,

    It is interesting in reading the article and comments here on Slashdot that no one has talked about the effect cooperation between Iran and North Korea would have on either accelerating the pace of malicious software deployed against these nation-states, or even worse, the use of other means to combat their nuclear ambitions.

    The Stuxnet worm was designed to target a single specific network. Yes, it spread in other ways, but the payload it deployed would was engineered so that it would only work on the Natanz nuclear facility's network. That is an insane level of precision and it clearly shows the huge investment made by the attacker(s) to ensure that this "cyberweapon" could only be triggered by the correct environmental conditions. It costs money to develop the targeting, payload and telemetry systems to support that, and the attacker(s) are only going to make that type of investment in what has to have been a highly-speculative "cyberweapon" if they believe they are going to get some value out of it.

    The value in malicious software like this (as well as in commercial spyware offerings, like FinFisher) is in their ability to perform without being detected by anti-malware software. As soon as that happens, the malicious software no longer has any value. The attacker may attempt to update their malicious software for a few generations, but once they are on the radar of anti-malware companies, samples of the new variants will make their way to the researchers at the anti-malware companies, possibly with metadata or telemetry that allows the point of origin to be identified. Which is not so good for plausible deniability. It is also possible that the countermeasures introduced to foil detection by anti-malware programs will introduce unforeseen errors into the malicious program, simply because it was not as fully tested as the original attack.

    If one is to believe that the Stuxnet worm was jointly-created by the United States and Israeli to (1) degrade Iran's nuclear ambitions; and (2) as a means of delaying an attack by Israel on Iran than one has to wonder about what sort of options are to be considered if malicious software is no longer an option.

    From the defender's point of view, Iran's response to the Flame malware was probably the most effective thing they could do to combat it: The Iranian CERT blasted out copies of it to anti-malware companies around the world, ensuring that detection would be added in a matter of hours. Anti-malware companies add detection of malicious software sent to them; that's what they do, after all.

    The idea that an anti-malware company would not add detection for a threat because it may have been created by or used by a governmentâ"or they were told not to by their governmentâ"does not hold water. While anti-malware software may be thought of as an American or Western European creation, there are plenty of anti-malware companies in South America, the Middle East, Asia, Eastern Europe and other parts of the globe, and any anti-malware company that did not add detection for such a threat would be subject to speculation and scrutiny about why. It would be a tacit admission by the country the anti-malware company operated in that their government was responsible for the malware.

    Maintaining plausible deniability means not blocking or otherwise interfering with the detection of malware by anti-malware companies, and when they respond to a threat in hours that may have taken weeks, months or even years to develop, well, you start looking for other ways to get more bang for your buck. My fear is the emphasis will be on the bang.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  48. Oh no, the horror! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The two most backward nations, totally reliant on imported technology for everything, join hands on technology. To do what exactly? Getter better deals on German equipment by placing their orders together?

    You also got to wonder how this alliance will work. One hates religion, the other hates communism. A marriage made in heaven!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh no, the horror! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      North Korea gets rockets that work and Iran gets working nuclear warheads of a sort.

  49. Lol, and how is this different from the US? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They get them from China. The elite are very well off, it's very similar as to how it was in England and whatever other country American emigrated from. The factory workers are broke, poor and downtrodden but the farmers and the elite? You know, they get massive subsidies and bailouts and a few decades of luxury. And if you're in politics, you get even more privileges like state funded medical care.

    Don't worry though, through years of TV watching, they teach their subjects that the socialists are out to steal their American Dream.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Lol, and how is this different from the US? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't been to China anytime in the last 10 years, and only listen to what the media here keeps telling you. That bulging middle class, that didn't exist 15 years ago is exploding as much as we didn't have one 200 years ago here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Lol, and how is this different from the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... round about the same time that China starts embracing world trade and early capitalist ideas... the middle-class increases, outward appearances of poverty reduce, but actual real-terms for the poor are still as shit as they have been for years.

      Pretty much exactly how it worked for us as well. So why does it sound you disagree with the parent poster?

  50. Eh... those who don't read are idiots by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0

    Japan DID put government funds into its industry and that was the start of the Asian tigers.

    And wonderful software from Iran and North Korea? Two of the most backward nations in the world where anyone who uses his/her brain is just a suspect? HA!

    The only reason these two countries have such problem with malware is that they have to use western software and hardware and don't have the know how to install and maintain it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. Re:Speaking as an AV guy, this does not bode well by ByronHope · · Score: 1

    To back up your points, 27C3: Adventures in analyzing Stuxnet (Bruce Dang from Microsoft). An amazing video where Bruce gives a blow by blow account of the discovery of Stuxnet and the measures that were taken to close the holes it exploited.

  52. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "Nazis", not "Nazi's". Apostrophe's indicate a contraction or possession. It's like writing "Do you like the American's?"

  53. 0 + 0 = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their antivirus software will be developed on a network of 15,000 TRS-80 and Sinclair PCs.
    The code will be written in Cobol and Fortran.
    They will become experts at the previous generation of every malware package.

  54. North Korea side = wrong side, under all aspects by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    Well, I think this makes it pretty clear what kind of people the Iranian regime consists of. Anyone who is prepared to ally itself with North Korea, the greatest gangster -1984 nightmare- regime in the world, loses all credibility in my book.

  55. Re:All because they use American Computer software by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    They have malware because they're heavy uses of American Software.

    Stuxnet came first and it was highly targeted at specific hardware configurations that would only be found in Iranian nuclear facilities.

    I don't think it would have mattered what software the Iranians had installed,
    since the (alleged) American/Israeli coders had all the time in the world to replicate the setup and probe for exploits.

    The problem isn't American software, it's that flaws will creep into the most carefully crafted code.
    Even the OSS theory that 'given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow' hasn't prevented exploits from lingering in Linux code for years.

    tldr version: They have malware because people are trying to hack them.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  56. ok, i read that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    someone who misrepresents someone else's position is what in your dictionary?

    i'm not a warmongerer. i'm saying to say north korea and iran represent no threat is stupid. do you see the difference? i said it elsewhere:

    of course, if we attacked north korea, they have so much artillery pointed at seoul they would level it in no time. so i'm not arguing for preemptive war. their trump card really is their insane bellicosity. this is where someone says we pushed them to that. really? the west is a monster whose only proper response is constant war preparation? hey brazil, philippines, india: you better start frothing at the mouth and militarizing like no tomorrow, and threatening to annihilate your neighbors constantly! why?: because the west! pfffffft: the constant war preparation is the fault of iran and north korea only. this is the path they chose

    i'm just arguing that people who say they have no menace, that they represent no threat, are wrong. the situation is unstable and has the markings of something that ends badly. not that we should attack the countries, just that you are wrong that this kind of thing just goes away on its own or that they never succeed in having the capacity to do real harm, or that they never strike for no rational reason

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3091717&cid=41220345

    so don't misrepresent what i said

    if i call you silly stupid and uneducated for thinking these nations represent no threat it does not automatically follow the solution is to wage war. this is you inserting an assumption about me and my position that only exists in your head

    do you understand?

    i don't want to attack these countries. at the same time, i'm not going to sit here and listen to some moron say these countries are not a threat. any country that hypermilitarizes and issues bellicose warning for decades is obviously a threat

    i'm afraid to tell you the sky is blue. you might attack me for not citing it. pffffffffffft

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ok, i read that by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      ok, I read that

      Hypocrite.

      someone who misrepresents someone else's position is what in your dictionary?

      In my dictionary, that is YOU.

      Your go-to style of argumentation is EXACTLY THAT. All you do is put words into other people's mouths. Hell you are such a solipsist you even quoted yourself not realizing that you did exactly that in your own quote from someone other discussion with someone else -- "this is where someone says we pushed them to that." Same shit you pulled on me when you wrote, "this is where you lecture me on how these are peace loving harmless countries."

      Furthremore you keep insisting on your own set of facts. All the sabre-rattling in the world doesn't add up to what you claim to be baseline knowledge about those countries. Like I said, I know a hell of a lot more about North Korea than you do. So far all the knowledge you've demonstrated is nothing more than the headlines from chickenhawk press releases.

      Oh, and one last thing: What part of "They should be opposed with a level of effort equal to their level of threat - not their level of venom." is "thinking these nations represent no threat?"

      Oh yeah, more misrepresentation of someone else's position. What a surprise.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:ok, i read that by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      do you understand?

      No, and he won't understand. He's one of those people who, if asked, will probably identify as being sceptical, yet is more concerned with locating conspiracy than in developing a realistic understanding of a situation. Look at how the belief that "cyber war" is being overhyped is the backbone of his argument as to why North Korea is not a threat. Even accepting that military and intelligence agencies will work to create a market for themselves, that doesn't brush away the decades of sabre rattling we've seen from the DPRK.

      I find it difficult to believe that the DPRK will be content to mind its own business, and occasionally firing rickety rockets in to the Sea of Japan. Barring a major change of circumstances, the DPRK will continue to develop its offensive capabilities. Without aggression, what else do they have to bargain with. The example of Iraq may dissuade them from going at it hammer and tongs, as does their need to avoid upsetting China by causing shit in their backyard. I imagine like you, I don't advocate marching in to North Korea. We're dealing with a nation subjected to unprecedented levels of isolation and propaganda, and China and Japan would be pretty miffed if a US/European invasion force turned up on their doorstep. Containment, with the possibility of limited strikes in response to real threats, seem the only practical options. When the DPRK falls, or perhaps begins following China's path, it'll be far worse than the ending of the GDR. At least in the GDR, there were people with far more exposure to the outside world, and those who remember living in a state that didn't fence its citzens in behind barbed wire. Also, the GDR's fall has helped by Soviet unwillingness to intervene to prop up the regime. Would China do the same in the case of the DPRK? I think it's the waiting game, with the hope that increased prosperity and stability in Asia will leave nations there less willing to suffer the impact and risks associated with having this basket case for a neighbour.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:ok, i read that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are looking for a real, credible threat, you should be looking hard at Suadi Arabia (OBL and friends), and Israel (Occupied territories and Mossad), or even the US, who has Iran completely surrounded, or you should really just shut yer mouth. You are a brainwashed fool, and a troll.

  57. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean:

    "Anytime you done wrote a complete sentence with proper grammar means the grammar Nazis of won."

  58. it's a mad, mad, mad, mad world by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Way to go geniuses, you just made the Axis of Evil (tm) the good guys.
    All they need to do is release their findings to the public.

    oh, and they should totally team up with Anonymous...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  59. thats just ducky. by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    We now force our enemies to do for operating systems what our [friendly? domestic?] operating system suppliers should have done! Can't wait for my windows 8 North Korean version to go into beta!

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  60. Re:Oh, the Irony by ACS+Solver · · Score: 2

    Others have already made good points here.

    Satellites and space stuff? Launch systems as we know them are largely the work of von Braun's team. Nazi tech!

    Computers? The Z3 was not a particularly elegant machine, but it was the first programmable Turing-complete computer. Back in 1941. A good thing for the war that the Nazi leadership denied funding to upgrade the machine.

    How about jet aircraft? The He 178 was the first one to fly. Designed by whom? Oh yeah, Nazis.

    The StG 44 assault rifle made by the same damn Nazis was a new designed that influenced both the AK47 and M16. Speaking of weapons, the first military night vision device? Yep, also used by the Nazis and developed in Germany. Or how about their engineers making the first proper radar?

    Things aren't as simple as saying the Nazis were horrible and lost the war, thus they provided no useful legacy. They had brilliant engineers and more than a few modern technologies contain innovations developed by Germany during that time. And that's not even considering the innovations that were later developed in the USA but by scientists brought over in Operation Paperclip.

  61. Re:Oh, the Irony by davydagger · · Score: 1

    the turbine engine was invented in england actually.

    magnetic tape, correct.

    rockets??? try ancient china.

  62. Please do not be offended! by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    The USA offered 4 Billion in food aid to North Korea to quit a nuclear program many times and the politicians never intended to follow through "A spineless obligation" they would have just sent over contaminated food anyway to kill the part of the population.

    Iran have the right to Nuclear Power and are actually extremely well managed. They actually have a right to defend themselves against malware and people in North Korea and Iran are awesome coders.It is all war threats and UK are complicit in this issue.

    As many people on /. know a true hacker tends to work alone and hand crafting code is one time thing and sending a one time malformed deep packet inspection that Carnivore, Magic Lantern are not up to speed with or GCHQ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9192209/GCHQ-warns-it-is-losing-terrorists-on-the-internet.html is a little insight

    I am not connected to any terrorism group blah blah but I am a true hacker who prefers not to put technology in the hands of dangerous people as Sir Arthur C Clarke said don't do it, when I was at his place in Cinnamon Gardens Sri Lanka as some of his inventions were used for all the wrong reasons.

    He was a friend of Einstein and so is Sir Patrick Moore who is a wonderful chap :) I suppose people should take a leaf out of what Sir Bertrand Russell said and that was "This idea of weapons of mass extermination is utterly horrible and is something which no one with one spark of humanity can tolerate. I will not pretend to obey a government which is organising a mass massacre of mankind".

    Can you see where this is leading? and his other quote was "“The moral think I would wish to say is very simple: love is wise – hatred is foolish.
    In this world, which is getting more and more closely interconnected, we have to learn to tolerate each other; we have to learn to put up with the fact that some people say things that we don’t like.
    We can only live together in that way, if we are to live together and not die together. We must learn the kind of charity and the kind of tolerance which is absolutely vital to the continuation of human life on this planet.”

    (Bertrand Russell quote from a televised interview in 1958 at the age of 86)".

     

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  63. Where did NK get computers from? by davydagger · · Score: 1

    I was unawake the North Korea had enough computers to be dependant on them enough that a cyber attack would even be effective. Even if they had a few computers, do they a complex network accessable from the outside.

    Computer experts, in the modern sense? Any systems to attack?

    It makes sense from Iran's standpoint. They were attacked by Duqu and Stuxnet.

    Is anyone else not connecting the talk of Iranian nuclear weapons and trying to not get hacked?

  64. How can I help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And will I be prosecuted if I do?

  65. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    North Korea has already given Iran nukes.

  66. Re:Oh, the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time you take El Al to Ben Gurion you're using Nazi jet engine technology.