MP Seeking To Outlaw Written Accounts of Child Abuse

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

MP Seeking To Outlaw Written Accounts of Child Abuse

Posted by samzenpus on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @04:30PM from the watch-what-you-write dept.

First time accepted submitter Anduril1986 writes "A UK Conservative MP is seeking to expand censorship in another 'think of the children' debate. The plan this time is to make it illegal to possess written accounts of child abuse. According to Sir Paul Beresford, the MP for Mole Valley such writing 'fuels the fantasies' of offenders and could lead to the physical abuse of children."

6 of 454 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Don't ever let the fundies know about it !! by Taco+Cowboy · 2012-09-12 17:46 · Score: 0, Troll

It is proven that birth leads in 100% of cases to death, hence, we will defeat death itself by this move.
Please do not let the religious fundamentalists know about it.
No matter which religion they are from - Christians or Islam - because for them, their respective true prophet never die.
You see, defeating death is no longer news to them any more - Their respective prophets had already achieved that unimaginable feat a long, long time ago.

--
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
1. Re:Don't ever let the fundies know about it !! by BlueStrat · 2012-09-12 18:32 · Score: -1, Troll
  
  It is proven that birth leads in 100% of cases to death, hence, we will defeat death itself by this move.
  
  Please do not let the religious fundamentalists know about it.
  Sounds more like something from the moonbat PC Progressive-Left than religious-fundy stuff to be perfectly honest, given their love for all things eugenics/abortion-related and their collective-good-over-individual-good views on how healthcare and other resources and services should be allocated.
  Strat
  
  --
  Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
2. Re:Don't ever let the fundies know about it !! by BlueStrat · 2012-09-12 22:36 · Score: -1, Troll
  
  Before making a claim to anything happening "regardless of it's [sic] truth", you may want to post something true (or at least not batshit insane) and compare for reference.
  Well, let's see.
  eugenics/abortion-related (Planned Parenthood/Margaret Sanger) and their collective-good-over-individual-good views on how healthcare and other resources and services should be allocated. ("spread the wealth", "collective salvation", "collective gov-run healthcare" etc etc)
  So they don't support any of those ideas in parentheses?
  Somebody should alert the DNC. They must be confused, according to the 2012 DNC official party platform.
  Strat
  
  --
  Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
Re:Fool of an MP by Tastecicles · 2012-09-12 22:37 · Score: 0, Troll

citations needed.

--
Operation Guillotine is in effect.
Re:Fool of an MP by Tastecicles · 2012-09-12 23:03 · Score: 0, Troll

no, the burden is on you to prove your assertions. Or I call bullshit.

--
Operation Guillotine is in effect.
Re:Fool of an MP by Tastecicles · 2012-09-12 23:09 · Score: -1, Troll

They are all assertions until you cite your sources.

--
Operation Guillotine is in effect.