Slashdot Mirror


WD Builds High-Capacity, Helium-Filled HDDs

Lucas123 writes "Western Digital subsidiary HGST today announced that after 10 years of development it is preparing to release 3.5-in data center-class HDDs that are hermetically sealed with helium inside. The helium reduces drag and wind turbulence created by the spinning platters, all but eliminating track misregistration that has become a major issue to increasing drive density in recent years. Because of that, HGST will be able to add two more platters along with increasing the tracks per inch, which results in a 40% capacity increase. The drives will also use 23% less power because of the reduction of friction on the spindle. HGST said the new seven-platter helium drives will weigh 29% less per terabyte of capacity that today's five-platter drives. In other words, a seven-platter helium disk will weigh 690 grams, the same as today's five-platter drives."

17 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why not a vacuum by xynopsis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

    Why a gas? Why not float it using an electromagnet instead?

  2. Re:Disaster by netdigger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes yes, you have to watch out for that non explosive helium.

  3. Only one problem by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    These disks are great except when you replay audio files the vocalists sound like munchkins.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  4. Re:Disaster by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    *facepalm*
    *hands over nerd card*

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  5. Re:Disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Argon walks into a bar. An alarm goes off and the bartender yells "Hey, we don't serve your kind here!" Argon, of course, didn't react.

  6. Sure they weigh less by countach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure they weigh less, because they are filled with helium. But when the servers start lifting off the ground and floating off, they might have to rethink this idea.

    1. Re:Sure they weigh less by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well shit! My data is already in the cloud. What difference would it make anyways?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Sure they weigh less by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      These hard drives are obviously made for cloud storage.

  7. Re:But the cost? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reduced friction and reduced turbulence might enable higher seek times.

    By higher I meant better, which in the case of seek times is of course lower.

  8. Re:Done 40 years ago by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps they sealed the drives with more helium.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure the correct response was "WOOSH"

  10. Re:Why not a vacuum by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Not only that, but after the helium migrates through the pores in the metal housing, the heads will crash! Physically programmed disk death!"

    Well, it's still better than their past efforts. The hydrogen-filled drives worked just great, until they got to New Jersey. Then they exploded.

  11. Re:Why not a vacuum by jiteo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Technically, it's "woosh" in lower case, because the joke was riding on a thin cushion of air, and therefore not making much noise.

  12. Re:Why not a vacuum by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    With these new helium filled drives, the "whoosh" would be in a high-pitched, squeaky voice.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  13. Re:Scarce(r) resource by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funnies aside, not a good idea. High purity hydrogen makes many metal alloys brittle. Helium works so well because it's ideal gas that doesn't chemically react with almost anything.

    Then how about Argon, Krypton, or Neon?

    Nope. It doesn't react with any of those either.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. Re:Why not a vacuum by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I was taken to New Jersey I would explode too.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  15. Re:Why not a vacuum by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's lower case, but "weeeesh". They're using helium, now. Didn't you read the article?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.