Slashdot Mirror


WD Builds High-Capacity, Helium-Filled HDDs

Lucas123 writes "Western Digital subsidiary HGST today announced that after 10 years of development it is preparing to release 3.5-in data center-class HDDs that are hermetically sealed with helium inside. The helium reduces drag and wind turbulence created by the spinning platters, all but eliminating track misregistration that has become a major issue to increasing drive density in recent years. Because of that, HGST will be able to add two more platters along with increasing the tracks per inch, which results in a 40% capacity increase. The drives will also use 23% less power because of the reduction of friction on the spindle. HGST said the new seven-platter helium drives will weigh 29% less per terabyte of capacity that today's five-platter drives. In other words, a seven-platter helium disk will weigh 690 grams, the same as today's five-platter drives."

9 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Disaster by netdigger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes yes, you have to watch out for that non explosive helium.

  2. Only one problem by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    These disks are great except when you replay audio files the vocalists sound like munchkins.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  3. Re:Disaster by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    *facepalm*
    *hands over nerd card*

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  4. Re:Disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Argon walks into a bar. An alarm goes off and the bartender yells "Hey, we don't serve your kind here!" Argon, of course, didn't react.

  5. Sure they weigh less by countach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure they weigh less, because they are filled with helium. But when the servers start lifting off the ground and floating off, they might have to rethink this idea.

    1. Re:Sure they weigh less by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well shit! My data is already in the cloud. What difference would it make anyways?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  6. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure the correct response was "WOOSH"

  7. Re:Why not a vacuum by jiteo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Technically, it's "woosh" in lower case, because the joke was riding on a thin cushion of air, and therefore not making much noise.

  8. Re:Why not a vacuum by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's lower case, but "weeeesh". They're using helium, now. Didn't you read the article?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.