Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Scandal: High Profile Users Allegedly Involved In Paid-Editing

An anonymous reader writes "A new Wikipedia scandal: two high profile users, one of them board member of Wikimedia UK seem to have been caught doing edits for personal profit. It was also discovered that they ran an SEO business related to Wikipedia. Quoting: 'Roger Bamkin, trustee of the Wikimedia Foundation UK, whose LinkedIn page describes him as a high-return-earning PR consultant, appeared to be using Wikipedia's main page "Did You Know" feature and the resources of Wikipedia's GLAM WikiProject (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) initiative to pimp his client's project. Bamkin's current client is the country of Gibraltar.'"

9 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. A bad thing? by The+Shootist · · Score: 1, Informative

    As FUBAR as wiki is I don't see how it can possibly matter.

    As an aside, there is data concerning impact craters that is no longer correct, I tried to edit the entry for the Moon and Mars; the hoops one has to go through made the entire process less than worthwhile.

    1. Re:A bad thing? by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      Articles like those get a lot of elementary school students messing with them, which is why they are often semi-protected.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  2. Re:According to wikipedia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    We can ignore the fact that most British people are not happy with the government they have. A government that is in the business of selling that which belongs to the people of the country to their mates. Steal as much as they can while in office seems to be what's behind the actions of the cabinet.

  3. Re:...... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being human. That's the problem. I don't know of any other animal that cheats, lies, steals, and deceives like we do. Whatever happened to just plain ol killing?! Oh...never mind.

    Pretty sure I read it here on /. that chimpanzees have been recorded lying/deceiving like we do. They even plan for their future lies/deceit.

  4. Gibraltar is not a country. by solferino · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bamkin's current client is the country of Gibraltar.

    Gibraltar is not a country, it is a British overseas territory.

  5. Re:Sure Jimmy, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually Jimmy takes no salary from the Wikimedia Foundation and doesn't even ask for expenses to be covered. He could have easily exploited Wikipedia's popularity to become a billionaire, but chose not to. Instead he just gets to be the butt of stupid jokes like this one from people who have no idea what they're talking about.

  6. no such thing as Wikimedia Foundation UK by Submarine · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no such thing as "Wikimedia Foundation UK". There is "Wikimedia UK" (officially "Wiki UK limited"). The Wikimedia Foundation is a US-based organization that runs the servers that host Wikipedia and handles the associated administrative and financial matters. Wikimedia UK is just a local users' organization, also known as a "chapter".

    By writing "Wikimedia Foundation UK", the article writer seemed to imply that Roger Bamkin was a powerful person regarding the management of Wikipedia / Wikimedia sites. This is not the case.

  7. Re:Sure Jimmy, sure. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually Jimmy takes no salary from the Wikimedia Foundation and doesn't even ask for expenses to be covered. He could have easily exploited Wikipedia's popularity to become a billionaire, but chose not to. Instead he just gets to be the butt of stupid jokes like this one from people who have no idea what they're talking about.

    he's found a better way than salary.

    "The way Mr. Wales makes a living is by getting $50,000 to $70,000 per speaking engagement when he goes and lectures about Wikipedia.[6][7][8][9]."

    he's burning through 21k/month from money ultimately derived from the bizniz, not bad.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. Re:...... so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Useful links:

    The wiki page where the complaint was first raised:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Potential_abuse_of_DYK

    Jimmy Wales talk page where the argument is happeninng now:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales

    Discussions on Wikipedia critics forum:

    http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=914

    http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=926