Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Silicon-Based Quantum Bit

angry tapir writes "Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Australia have created the world's first working quantum bit based on a single atom in silicon. The research team was able to both read and write information using the spin, or magnetic orientation, of an electron bound to a single phosphorous atom embedded in a silicon chip. In February, UNSW researchers revealed they had successfully created a single-atom transistor using a single phosphorous atom in a silicon crystal."

6 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. Useful links by hweimer · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  2. Bit not a Qubit by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Informative

    All this demonstrates is the ability to store 1 bit of information at the atomic level not a Qubit which can be in multiple states at once due to quantum entanglement. This is like heralding the dawn of the computer age by promoting a mechanical calculator.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Bit not a Qubit by hweimer · · Score: 5, Informative

      They show relatively clear Rabi oscillations, which are a definite proof of the quantumness of the evolution of their system (which has nothing to do with entanglement). So, yes, this is a genuine qubit, albeit not a perfect one.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
    2. Re:Bit not a Qubit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, they've demonstrated a single Qubit.

      TFS makes things mucky by mentioning single electron transistors too, which are a completely different beast.

      The problem with quantum computing isn't demonstrating single qubits though. The problem is in getting a reasonable number in a superposition. Most I've ever seen in a QC that actually does computations is 7 qubits.

      Just to get an idea of the scale we need, Shor's algorithm, the one which we could use to crack RSA encryption in polynomial time, needs 2*N qubits minimum. So to crack RSA1024 we'd need 2048 qubits all in a state of superposition.

      I'm of the opinion adding more qubits to a superposition is going to be an exponentially hard problem.

  3. Re:I have a question: by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

    can you run linux on it?

    Nope. Linux requires at least a two bit computer to run.

  4. Re:payback by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    First Evidence of Quantum Tunnelling Slashdot Post Dismissed as Human Error.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.