Slashdot Mirror


Will Apple Vs Samsung Verdict Be Overturned?

An anonymous reader writes "While there's much talk of Apple asking for more money from Samsung, there's less talk of the likelihood that the verdict will be overturned completely. Based on voir dire, and the foreman's subsequent statements to the press, it seems he failed to follow the law."

7 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Android is a patent minefield by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If its Android that appears to be breaching patents surely they should be suing the Android/Google collective.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  2. It's too bad the juror wasn't on the supreme court by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I loved his position that a piece of prior art could be dismissed because the implementation discussed ran on a different processor architecture. Judicial functionaries have a proud history of pulling distinctions out of their asses and calling them 'tests'(later given first names, if they catch on more broadly); but that one was classic.

  3. Re:Again by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple wins in GPU benchmarks, but Apple hasn't innovated with the iPhone in a while. All the key features in both iOS 5 and iOS 6 existed in Android and Windows Mobile first.

    When they announced the 4S and 5, you'll note neither have any key innovations.

    People want to credit for the full-screen bar phone with multi-touch as this brilliant design that everyone copied. In reality, it is a common sense design that appeared in sci-fi for a reason. Once it became affordable to make it reality, then 3 different companies came up with the same design at the same time (LG, Samsung, Apple). What has Apple done since then literally other than copy heavily from those around them?

    And yet they play the victim.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  4. Re:Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So playing with the phone for 25 minutes now counts as "using" the phone?

    You are an iphone fan. Like may other iphone fans even if you were handed a cell phone that was better in every way you would still say the iphone was better.

    Personally I feel you need to use a phone for a few weeks to begin to get used to it. All cell phones should have a 60 day trial period. You use the phone for 60 days. You can return that phone for any reason no questions asked up to 60 days. That way you can actually use the phone and see how it works for you. I know never going to happen, but it would be good to have that.

  5. Re:Sick of hearing about Apple vs. Samsung by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's just not something you need to worry about.

    You're living in the exact blind loyalty dream world that every monopoly hopes people will live in.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  6. Re:Again by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I doubt Apple will ever copy the cheap feeling the Galaxy SIII has when you hold it in your hand. I have been an iPhone user since the 3G

    I dumped my 3GS for a Galaxy phone. This "cheap feeling" propaganda is just mindless rhetoric that is the last resort of fanboys that don't have enough clue to criticize something meaningful.

    You can't say anything technical so you go for the most superficial and subjective thing you can.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. Talk About Bogus Patent Claims by Morrighu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everything that Apple sued over is prior art. Seriously.... 100% of it. I don't understand why Samsung's legal team didn't just go camp at the USPTO with their prior art and get those patents revoked. No patent = no law suit. What a bunch of screw ups. And Apple is infringing everyone from HTC to Mitsubishi to Nokia to IBM with their "patents". Feel free to pile on and offer up your own examples of prior art.... http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/457/prior-art-should-invalidate-apples-patents