Slashdot Mirror


Goodyear's 'On TheGo' Self Inflating Tire

SternisheFan writes with a bit of maintenance saving tech for drivers. From the article: "When was the last time you checked your tire pressure? If you're scratching your head, you might want to put a set of Goodyear's new self-inflating tires on your ride. The company's Air Maintenance Technology was rolled out of the lab this week for debut at a car show in Germany. Commercial truckers will be the first to put the rubber to test, but a consumer version is in the works. A regulator in the tire senses when tire-inflation pressure drops below a pre-set point and opens to allow air flow into the pumping tube. As the tire rolls, deformation flattens the tube, pushing air through the tire to the inlet valve and then into the tire cavity. All this technology, in Goodyear's words, eliminates the need for 'external inflation pressure intervention.'"

37 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds different from the bike one. by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Informative

    The bike on inflates itself simply by rolling. I would love to have these, but they're not exactly mass production yet and I've got a lot of goofy tire sizes on my bikes.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by Fishead · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just paid $80 to change a rim on my truck because it was rusty and leaking. ($40 for the rim from a junk yard, $40 to mount and balance). 35 years old, 25% failure rate. Not too bad.

      My truck is old-school. New, problematic, overly complicated technology is unwelcome. This new technology sounds new, overly complicated, and problematic.

      I just wish there was an AM station to listen to on the way to work...

    2. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Yeah.

      I got a single digit, for you!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by Genda · · Score: 2

      Or you could get a Toyota Avalon, and do standard maintenance... 220,000 miles and nothing has ever gone wrong. I've got all those things you don't have and it still works like a champ. Could the real problem be American planned obsolescence? Just a thought.

    4. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you could get a Toyota Avalon, and do standard maintenance... 220,000 miles and nothing has ever gone wrong. I've got all those things you don't have and it still works like a champ. Could the real problem be American planned obsolescence? Just a thought.

      The problem with that is a well maintained Toyota Avalon is still a Toyota Avalon. BTW, Toyota doesn't have to plan obsolescence, the Japanese government has legislated it for them. It gets expensive to keep old cars in Japan.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by FishTankX · · Score: 2

      No, they have an absurd system where the car needs to pass an inspection every 2 years, variable cost depending on the vehicle ($600 for 'light cars' (660cc cars), $1200 for normal cars, more for trucks etc..) and basically check all of the high wear parts on the car, and throw in compulsory auto insurance. What this tends to do, when the car starts to wear heavily, is to make repeatedly paying the shaken more expensive than buying a new car (3 year exemption) or a used car that hasn't degraded as far.

      What ends up happening is that it ends up getting sold to a car export company, which will offer to take this newly worthless car off their hands (can't drive if the car inspection certificate is expired) and prepare it for export to various left driving countries for a handsome profit (A car that's worth $0 in Japan due to Shaken might be worth $4000 and have another 100,000+ miles in it in another country. Japanese cars tend to get low mileage because the average Japanese person I believe only drives a few thousand miles per year due to the compactness of their cities. Thus, after 10 to 15 it might have only gone 90,000 miles and after of wearing the car still has a ton of life left in it.)

      What this also insures is that there is never an unsafe or rust bucket type car on the road. Cars in Japan tend to be aesthetically perfect.

    6. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      No, they have an absurd system where the car needs to pass an inspection every 2 years, variable cost depending on the vehicle ($600 for 'light cars' (660cc cars), $1200 for normal cars, more for trucks etc..) and basically check all of the high wear parts on the car, and throw in compulsory auto insurance. What this tends to do, when the car starts to wear heavily, is to make repeatedly paying the shaken more expensive than buying a new car (3 year exemption) or a used car that hasn't degraded as far.

      The Japanese aren't the only ones who have regular safety and emissions testing on older cars... and who said anything about buying old cars? Buy new Japanese cars... My parents have owned 5 Subarus since 1984, and between them have put on more than 2 million KM's without a single major repair. I think that speaks quite highly for their reliability. And since the OP was talking about Toyota trucks specifically, you'd do well to watch this series of videos from Series 3 of BBC's Top Gear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnWKz7Cthkk

    7. Re:Sounds different from the bike one. by kraut · · Score: 2

      No, they have an absurd system where the car needs to pass an inspection every 2 year

      Outrageous. In Europe, cars get inspected every year (with a two year exemption for new cars) [YMMW, haven't checked all countries, etc pp., E&OE]

      throw in compulsory auto insurance

      compulsory insurance? The devils!

      What this also insures is that there is never an unsafe or rust bucket type car on the road.

      And that's a bad thing why?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  2. New Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how long before this technology is implemented to other 'inflatable' ummm... technologies?

    I'm sure that this has many 'practical' implications for the 'companions' of the slashdot readership?

  3. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by PortHaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you're missing the point. This is EXACTLY what we need with gas at $4/gallon.

    When your tire pressure is low, you get less MPG. So this tire, when the pressure gets low will open a valve to "reinflate" your tire to specified pressure. Ensuring proper ride, handling and better gas mileage.

    It's not going to inflate constantly, rather just when the tire drops below a set level. Kind of like a thermostat. but for pressure. A barometricstat.

  4. Price is key... by flatbedexpress · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Currently, I pay around $400-$600 per truck tire in my fleet and this is using my national fleet account from Bridgestone. I would hate to see what the price of this tire is going to be. The current prices are already hard to swallow when I have 80 Heavy-Haul trucks and over 200 trailers. That is a lot of tires!

    1. Re:Price is key... by PortHaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ask yourself, would you pay $50/tire more, if you got 2-4mpg more in your vehicle?

      $4,000 = 20,000 miles at 20mpg @$4/gallon (approx estimates)

      $3,636 = 20,000 miles at 22mpg @$4/gallon

      That's nearly $400 savings in 20,000 miles. So if they can do that for under $100/tire, you're about break even. Even 1mpg more would be about $200 (which would cover $50/tire). If your fleet averaged more than 20,000 miles per year. You might even end up saving $$$ in your annual budget.

    2. Re:Price is key... by flatbedexpress · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just so you know, we don't see 20mpg in the trucking industry. We get on average 4-7mpg depending on how much of the EPA garbage you have in the engine.

    3. Re:Price is key... by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      According to the literature, at 20% under-inflated, you lose 15% mpg. That would be significant for you.

      OTH, your vehicles probably get checked far more often than a typical vehicle and don't run that far under pressure for very long. After all, most people aren't forced to stop their private cars to check weight limits and undergo random inspections from safety officers and undergo audits of their maintenance records.

      So for you, probably the savings would come from labor: not having to check the pressure on/inflate the tires of an 18 wheeler so the truck has more time on the road, and also less wear and replacement of failed tires from under-inflation.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Price is key... by Alex+Pennace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was reading a DOT report on "Commercial Medium Tire Debris Study" (DOT HS 811 060) and an inference that approximately 50% of tire failures are due to belt separation and that 50% of the probable cause is due to under inflation (both refer to "all tire failures").

      And not enough of the cost of tread separation is borne by users of retreads. Aside from the all too common problem of tire guts strewn along the shoulder of the highway, there is the very real danger of a retread causing damage to a vehicle or possibly an accident with injuries. Last year, I had the pleasure of driving along Rt 128 here in Bostonland at night. An 18 wheeler decided to cast off one of its tires; I managed to avoid all but one of the pieces. My reward is a large dent in my once pristine car, and no clue who is responsible beyond the fact that it is 17 wheeler now.

      I'm not saying retreads are always bad, nor am I suggesting we should soak truckers because they are evil. But the way retreads are currently used have significant externalities for other road users. The very same road users who would have bought an item that the truck was carrying if they didn't have to fix their car.

    5. Re:Price is key... by stox · · Score: 2

      Apparently, so is checking the lug nuts. I've actually seen a wheel fall off a semi on I-55, southwest of Chicago. One of the scarier experiences of my driving career, as the wheel sailed across the lane in front of me, into a divider, and back across the highway again.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  5. Apple sueing Goodyear by PortHaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple has filed a lawsuit against Goodyear tire saying their new auto-inflating tire violates their patents. They have "an app for that", and therefore, Goodyear's later tire is cleary a copy of one of their several millions apps. Apple is not sure which one, but they know since there is an "app for everything", Goodyear must be in violation.

    They are asking $3.9 billion in damages and a halt on all sales of Goodyear tires. As they've pointed out tires are a clear infringement of their trade dress. Their buttons on their iPhones and iPads are round. And Goodyear tires are round. So that's $1 for every tire Goodyear has sold.

    1. Re:Apple sueing Goodyear by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      Apple is on very solid grounds on this law suite. In fact all tires are really rounded rectangles, just very very well rounded. So Goodyear is going to lose. Also checking the inflation of a bicycle type by pinching it with two finger, that is also out. Covered by the multi touch patent.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  6. Re:I would be happy just having ... by JDeane · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some cars do display the PSI of the tires via TPMS, it could be combined with this system to let you know "Tire Failure is Eminent" of course this would require some sort of software and memory to keep track of normal air pressure loss. Probably be limited to the more expensive cars.

  7. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those tires need windows you can open to let the air in.

  8. Re:Self-foaming tires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    +5 insightful

    Bad idea. Foam filled and other "airless tires" all have very high rolling resistance (takes more energy to roll than an air filled tire). Their only applications are where the cost of a flat is very high (or very inconvenient) -- for example military vehicles or wheel chairs.

  9. Re:Self-foaming tires. by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Informative

    -5 idiotic to GP post.

    Solid tires suck, there is a reason we use pneumatic tires. Foam filled ones ride harshly and weigh more than air filled ones. There are foam filled tires out there, generally used where ride quality is not a concern.

    At least, I presume he means that because he says "Don't need air"

    Tires with a self sealing foam system still need air. Tires get low because the bead and valve aren't prefect, not because there are holes.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  10. Re:World's Wildest Coming Attractions: by petermgreen · · Score: 2

    I doubt this will help against spike strips. It sounds more designed for gradual re-inflation.

    IIRC they make run on flat tyres designed for use where the ability to escape quickly in the event of a deliberately punctured tyre is needed.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  11. Re:Police Tires, no? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

    why can we not all have tires that yield not to trivial roadside rubbish?

    We can. We just choose not to pay for them

    The police, on the other hand, (a) don't have to pay for them--your tax dollars at work--and (b) have an arguably worthwhile need to not have to worry about flat tires.

    Just out of curiosity, what do people around here think of "run flat" tires? A new car I'm considering getting comes with them standard and I'm curious...

  12. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where this technology is needed is RV and trailer tires. If a car tire blows, usually one has a time where it runs flat. A travel trailer or a fifth wheel, you don't feel the blown tire until it has blown off the rim and caused significant amounts of damage to the rig. Having something like this wouldn't just save 1-2 MPG, it might save a $50,000 trailer or more if it keeps a tire on the rim.

  13. Performance in wet weather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not trolling here, but how does it pump only air and not water? I've driven in some wet parts of the country, and many more that were snowy and slushy. There's a lot of dust and moisture down there on the road at times.

  14. Re:I would be happy just having ... by smi.james.th · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Tire Failure is Imminent"

    FTFY. Eminent tyre failure isn't really what we want here ;-)

    --
    One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
  15. Re:Police Tires, no? by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just out of curiosity, what do people around here think of "run flat" tires? A new car I'm considering getting comes with them standard and I'm curious...

    That depends. If you buy a car to get from point A to point B, they aren't that bad. Factor in that replacements are more expensive, wear out quicker, and mechanics often charge more to mount/balance them, versus the extremely occasional flat tire.

    However, if you are any sort of auto enthusiast, run-flat tires are the work of the devil. Very small selection, all with bad handling and poor traction. Many people are not buying BMWs any more simply because they all come with run-flats, and the extra added expense of buying four real tires for a brand new old car is just silly.

  16. Re:Redundant by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Typically most drivers don't re-inflate the tires themselves. This is usually done when getting the next oil change or taking a trip to the dealership. But yes, it does require those pesky warning lights to grab their attention and remind them.

    Where this technology really has a benefit would be for 18 wheelers like the article states. Living in Houston, I constantly see blown tire tread all curled on the highways. It's a port city, so the level of 18 wheeler traffic is to be expected. But the problem is when tire pressure is low. This generates a lot of heat (in an already hot and humid city) and shortens the life of the tire. Eventually it breaks down and disintegrates all over the public road ways causing a life hazard for other motorists. Tire tread is a lot of mass to be hitting at 65 to 70 MPH. If it doesn't cause you to wreck, at the very least it will cause major cosmetic damage to the front bumper's plastics.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  17. Re:Overrated. by OhPlz · · Score: 2

    Why does your TPMS go off all winter long? It will go off when the air temperature drops. Adjust the tire pressure and you should be good until spring. I've had this feature since '06 and that's always how it has worked out.

    The only thing that bugs me is that even on cars with touch screens, they cheap out and don't tell you which tires are at fault.

  18. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see how his would help with blowouts other than perhaps by reducing tire wear a bit by maintaining ideal pressure. No amount of "trickle-charging" is going to compensate for the fact that there is a gaping hole preventing the tire from holding air. And the usage scenario for trailers and RVs is generally sit around for months on end and then get driven around for a short while - unless the charge rate is pretty fast you'd still want to top off your tires before you hit the road, though I suppose it would be handy for those absent-minded individuals that forget to do so until they've been on the road for a hundred miles or so.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  19. Contrary to popular misconception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tire pressure should be set by the specific application. In a passenger car that generally has a weight that varies only a small amount over its service life, this tire could save a little time, but since it will almost certainly cost more, I don't much see the point. Car tires don't generally leak that much, and thanks to TPMS, (such as the one in my Chevy Impala with which I can see the pressure in each tire displayed on my dashboard) I can check without having to take the valve stem caps off. When it gets a little low, I top off the tires. However, the pressure that should be in each tire corresponds to the characteristics of the tire, AND THE LOAD ON THE TIRE. If you drive on tires with pressure that is too low, you get degraded performance, a spongier ride, increased likelihood of rim damage due to road irregularities, debris, etc., as well as excessive wear to the left and right edges of the tires. If the pressure is too high, depending on HOW MUCH they're too high by, you run risks ranging from degraded performance, increased chance of a blow-out, and the associated loss of control and crash that often occurs with this sort of thing at high speed, especially dangerous if two or more fail simultaneously. As a minimum, you can expect better fuel economy from your over-inflated tires, but decreased tire life span, as you'll see excessive wear in the center of the tread area, which also means greater odds of a flat from puncture than you'd have running over the same thing with a tire having the proper pressure.

    As for load, you must understand that the pressure inside the tire is equivalent to the distribution of weight over the entire area of the contact patch, the area of the tires' tread that touches the surface on which you're driving (the road, usually, though occasionally the sidewalk for more adventurous types). So if your tires are inflated to 50 p.s.i., and they're supposed to be at 25, the area in contact with the road should be about half of what it should be. Some people mistakenly believe their tires should be inflated to the MAXIMUM TIRE PRESSURE marking on the sidewall of the tire, and that's simply NOT TRUE under most circumstances. That's a specification that indicates the greatest internal/external pressure differential the tire can safely and reliably handle, under the normal stresses a tire is exposed to, when used in an application for which it was designed, and still give service life as specified and maybe also warranted by the manufacturer.

    So if a tire mounted to a passenger car that weighs 3000 pounds, and has a recommended tire pressure of 30 p.s.i. front and rear, is designed to have a contact patch that is 75 square inches, and you are routinely carrying 1000 pounds (between you, the driver, and all the cargo, and let's say the weight is more or less evenly distributed throughout the car,) the load on each tire is 4/3 what the specified pressure was intended for. You should therefore increase the COLD pressure for each tire, (measured and filled when the car has NOT just been driven, as per the manual of every car and truck I'VE ever owned...) by the same amount, so each tire should be at about 40 p.s.i., which BTW, if you carefully note the shape of the tire when the car is empty, the size of the contact patch, you should find it is the same when the pressure is bumped up to 40, with the extra weight added.

    Failure to adjust will result in tires that are overinflated or underinflated, depending on when you failed to adjust. Obviously, if you're carrying 3000 pounds in a car that weighs 3000 pounds, you'll probably void the warranty on car and tires, may damage both, and since the tires are probably not designed to handle TWICE THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE for that car, you run the risk of catastrophic tire failure.

    On SUV's and pickup trucks, esp. heavy duty ones, you'll note that in point of fact, the tires that come on them usually have a substantial overhead, can be aired up to much higher pressure than the recommended. This is because such vehicles

  20. Re:Police Tires, no? by mspohr · · Score: 2

    Had a friend who has a BMW with run flat tires. He got a flat and decided to just run flat. Worked for a few miles then everything came apart. Required a tow truck and much time and expense to put everything back together again. I don't think these tires are very good.
    (I'm sure there is a joke in here about iPhone users and BMW drivers but I can't think of it now... perhaps someone more brilliant will come up with it.)

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  21. Re:Neat by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    No, sorry to be a wet blanket but it wouldn't. Many, moons ago I had a job as a petrol pump jockey, in the 70's people served you at petrol stations, they filled up your tank, cleaned your widscreen, checked your oil, tyres, wiper water, and brake fluid (the aim of this "free service" was to sell tyres, engine oil, wiper blades, etc). I was standing behind the counter watching a guy who had spent ages trying to inflate his own tyre (he was not a paying customer), I was just about to walk over an offer him help when BOOM the tyre exploded with a puff of dust while he was knelt down in front of it. I figure he cannot have put more that 100psi in it since that's was the compressor's output. The guy was unhurt but very pale and shaken, he also had a light coating of tyre dust, no visable damage to the car other than the now totally deflated tyre. Apon hearing the explosion the boss strolled out of the workshop and called out to the guy across the courtyard - "I have new one of those in stock".

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. What if... by viperidaenz · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if I drive backwards? Does it deflate the tire?

  23. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by plover · · Score: 2

    I know a guy who runs a fleet of 500 trucks. If he could save $627 annually per truck that would mean a third of a million dollars back in his pocket every year. Another benefit is if his 500 drivers are each spending 5 minutes a day checking tire pressure, he could possibly reduce that to once per week if he rolled with these tires, saving another $200,000 annually on simple maintenance. (I don't know how anything about how often his drivers check tire pressure manually, or if they have remote sensors, so that could be completely imaginary savings.)

    Under-inflated tires fail more often than properly maintained tires, which means less down-time dealing with flats. That doesn't sound like a big deal, but when you realize that tires last only about 80,000 miles each and you have 18 on a rig, that could be a tire failure every 13 days. If all your tires are under-inflated, they would all last about 9% less, which would be a failure every 12 days. Most failed tires are caught by inspection, where the driver is already in a truck stop and repairs are less costly than side of the road service, and some tire failures are drivable to the next truck stop, where the driver will burn some downtime while he's getting it fixed, but not every failure is so convenient. Roadside service will take a couple of hours out of your schedule while you wait for the local guy to come out and fix it. Plus, tires are not cheap (the smaller trailer tires can cost around $500 each for new, (less for retreads,) and steer tires are significantly higher) and if a blowout damages something else, it's even more money. You want to get every mile you can out of those tires.

    And what happens if you're running a hot shot, with a significant penalty for failing to deliver on time? One late load can cost a large amount in direct losses, (think six figures) plus the potential loss of business if the big-spending customer never hires that sloppy trucking firm again.

    Every little improvement is significant to someone when multiplied by fleet sizes.

    --
    John
  24. Re:At the cost of fuel economy by BetterSense · · Score: 2

    Under-inflation is a major cause of blowouts.