Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Nabi Tablet-Maker, Fuhu Inc., Suing Toys R Us

Posted by Unknown on from the at-least-there-aren't-patents-involved dept.

Penurious Penguin writes "Fuhu Inc., maker of the $199 children-tailored Nabi tablet, is suing Toys R Us. The lawsuit arises after a legal agreement (ended in January) between Fuhu and Toys R Us went awry and Toys R Us released a similar product of their own, the $150 Tabeo. The dispute alleges that Toys R Us may have intended from inception to eventually abandon the Nabi for their own future variation, the Tabeo, presumably after gathering sufficient understanding of Fuhu's design concepts and business strategies. The ZDNet article quite thoroughly covering the story notes some of the formidable investors behind Fuhu, including Acer Inc., Kingston Digital, and Foxconn Digital Inc. Fuhu also sells through retail stores such as WalMart, Target, Best Buy, GameStop and Amazon.com.Another more-recent ZDNet article further analyzes the story."

6 of 38 comments (clear)

  1. I blame Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm an irrational Slashdot poster, so I'm just going to blame Apple now even though they have nothing to do with this.

    1. Re:I blame Apple by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

      I'm an irrational Slashdot poster, so I'm just going to blame Apple now even though they have nothing to do with this.

      This proves that Apple is the new Microsoft. At least around these parts.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    2. Re:I blame Apple by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      I'm an irrational Slashdot poster, so I'm just going to blame Apple now even though they have nothing to do with this.

      This proves that Apple is the new Microsoft. At least around these parts.

      ^
      Confirmed by Netcraft

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  2. Re:Design concepts and business strategies? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Informative

    according to TFA, Toys R Us copied their butterfly-shaped case, not rectangle. See pic in TFA.

  3. Nothing to see here by sirwired · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok; the Tabeo is shaped more-or-less like the Fuhu. But there are only so many ways to package an impact-friendly tablet... they use a similar one. I don't understand why Fuhu has their proverbial panties in a wad about the NDA. Once the design was publicly released, how does the NDA matter any more? One certainly didn't need access to Fuhu's internal design documents once it was sold on the open market for anyone to check out.

    And "business strategies"? What exactly would those be?
    1) Make a cheap tablet that looks like a toy.
    2) Sell a bunch of them for more than they cost.
    3) Profit!

    And so what if TRU planned to abandon the Fuhu from day one? While this might give future suppliers second thoughts about "partnering" with TRU, and it certainly isn't very nice, I don't see how it's illegal. Certainly Microsoft has gotten away with doing this repeatedly... (and yet they can still find suckers willing to partner.)

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by neonmonk · · Score: 2

      The Bob Kearns story shows why patents are necessary. We just need them to be sensible. Maybe corporations shouldn't be allowed to possess them.