Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Nebraska Sheriff Wardriving, Sending Letters About Unsecured Wi-Fi

Posted by Soulskill on from the after-they-torrent-the-latest-episode-of-cops dept.

An anonymous reader sends this quote from JournalStar.com: "The Lancaster County Sheriff’s Office has seen an increase in scammers using unsecured Wi-Fi connections to steal identities and mask their crimes during the past six months, Sheriff Terry Wagner said. ... So deputies spent the past few weeks finding unsecure connections and sending 40 to 50 letters to let people know about the potential dangers of strangers accessing their network connections. 'You're just opening yourself up for a series of potential pitfalls,' Chief Deputy Jeff Bliemeister said. ... Bliemeister said only businesses like coffee shops that offer Internet connections to customers need unsecured Internet connections.

11 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Law Enforcement at Work by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Applause!

    Much better than that goofball sheriff in Aridzona.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those of us in Maricopa County can worry about our sheriff; the rest of the country can worry about theirs. It's a local elected office. I do not understand the national media attention.

      As a former Phoenix resident, I have to say maybe it's because of things like this and this?

      Sorry, but once you step over the line and nobody else is reigning it in, it becomes a federal problem.

    2. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by pavon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those of us in Maricopa County can worry about our sheriff; the rest of the country can worry about theirs. It's a local elected office. I do not understand the national media attention.

      American citizens don't deserve to loose the fundamental constitutionally guaranteed rights when they travel through another county. Nor do prisoners deserve to be loose their (more limited) rights because they are transferred into your county. It's essential that his abuses get national media attention, so the rest of us can know to stay out of Maricopa county until you guys (or the feds) finally get around to doing something about it.

    3. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair though the administration started attacking him first.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those of us in Maricopa County can worry about our sheriff; the rest of the country can worry about theirs.

      Not when he started to investigate Obama's birth certificate. Arpaio is the one trying to put the Maricopa sheriff's office on the national stage, and when he does that the people who elected him have to take the criticism that provokes.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He said he would vote against telecom immunity but voted for it.
      He said he would have the DoJ ease up on the prosecution of medical marijuana but they did the opposite.
      He said he was going to institute a new era of transparency and rule of law but did neither.
      He said he would shut Gtimo, and end torture camps around the world, he did the opposite.
      He escalated foreign wars and most of them are actually secret, unofficial wars.
      He claims the right to kill American citizen without due process; not even Bush made that claim.

      The only one that is deluded is you.

    6. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On a world scale, yes, yes he is. The US view of "center" is just fucked off to the right by a lot.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    7. Re:Law Enforcement at Work by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Take a look at this chart of the political opinions expressed by world leaders: http://www.politicalcompass.org/images/internationalchart.png

      Hugo Chavez is left wing. The Dali Lama is left wing. Romney and Obama? On the broad global stage, they're both sharply right wing. The fact that their campaigns have you believing they're worlds apart is simply not reflected in their actual policies and rhetoric.

  2. Who says you can't? by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see anything in the article that said it was illegal to have open wifi, or that you couldn't.
    It said that open wifi was being used for identity theft, and that notices of potential dangers (I'd imagine such as possible repercussions for the wifi owner if fraud is traced back to their internet connection) were sent out.

    For a couple of older folks or just generally non-technical people who potentially just plugged in an unsecured D-link, not a terrible thing to be given information about, and somewhat pro-active of the Sheriff. It seems little different from the notices given to people who leave their cars unlocked in neighbourhoods experiencing an increase of car thefts...

  3. Re:Utter Horse-shit! by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the sheriff is trying to put a stop to cyber crimes and you oppose it because you like to leave an access point for neighbors?

    Why not give the password to the neighbors you want to allow on your network?

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  4. Re:They've tried by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fuck.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!