Slashdot Mirror


Newly Spotted Comet May Shine Among Brightest In History

Reader intellitech points to an article at National Geographic, from which he excerpts: "If astronomers' early predictions hold true, the holidays next year may hold a glowing gift for stargazers—a superbright comet, just discovered streaking near Saturn. Even with powerful telescopes, comet 2012 S1 (ISON) is now just a faint glow in the constellation Cancer. But the ball of ice and rocks might become visible to the naked eye for a few months in late 2013 and early 2014—perhaps outshining the moon, astronomers say. The comet is already remarkably bright, given how far it is from the sun, astronomer Raminder Singh Samra said. What's more, 2012 S1 seems to be following the path of the Great Comet of 1680, considered one of the most spectacular ever seen from Earth."

11 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. More Corona peeze by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Funny

    > asuperbright comet, just discovered streaking near Saturn

    Sweet -- look at the tail on that streaker!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Whats more by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    "What's more, 2012 S1 seems to be following the path of the Great Comet of 1680, considered one of the most spectacular ever seen from Earth."

    got a link? no?

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Great+comet+of+1680&l=1

    jeez, if your going to reference something in an article take 2 seconds to post a link

    1. Re:Whats more by yotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      I love clicking on a link that purports to be informative, when I did nothing wrong myself, and be presented with a page that tells me to run javascript.

      How about an actual link?

      https://www.google.com/search?q=great+comit+of+1680
      or even better
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Comet_of_1680

  3. I'll believe it when I see it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm old enough to have heard this sort of speculation about Kohoutek as well.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm old enough to have heard this sort of speculation about Kohoutek as well.

      That's fair enough, science hasn't changed since 1973. I believe that history will ultimately show that the decline of science started with the break-up of The Doors, though others contend that it was the rise of The Butts Band. Still others mark 1973 as the beginning of the end of civilisation itself, implying that the impact of the break-up of The Doors created tear in the fabric of human social history that was not simply limited to the decline of scientific endeavour.

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm old enough to remember Comet Bennett, in the early winter of 1970. I walked to school every morning, keeping my eye fixed on it, much to the irritation of the drivers that I somewhat randomly shared the roads with.
          I had a 4.5" Newtonian back home; but telescopes are not the best means of looking at comets. A decent pair of 7x50 binoculars are much better.
          I'm looking forward to this one. I took some good pix of McNaught, just at sunset, just north of the Golden Gate Bridge. This time I might do better.

    3. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by guttentag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm just old enough to remember seeing Halley's Comet in '86 and telling my parents I'd be too old to remember the first sighting when it came back in 2061.

      And I remember the next day at school when the teacher asked if everyone saw the comet, and one person proudly announced that he watched it on TV. That was the first time I said the word "dumbass" in public. I have a terrible feeling that the percentage of kids who tell the class they saw the comet on TV (or "YouTwitFace" -- the future conglomerate of YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) will be much higher the next time around.

  4. Kohoutek by mbone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am also old enough to remember the speculation about Kohoutek.

    It is notoriously hard to predict the brightness of "new" comets, as you know nothing about their history.

  5. Obligatory 'End of the World' thread here by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 4, Funny

    For starters, 2013 minus 2000 equals 13.

  6. Wonder when by kiriath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the nutcases will be busting out the Kool-aid

  7. Re:Religious implications by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Informative

    10 AD is outside the range of dates in which the birth of Jesus could have happened. At that time, Herod was already dead for over a decade.

    If you are interested in a good overview on the theories about the star of Bethlehem, I've found this page quite informative.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.