Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Tech Given 4-year Federal Prison Sentence For $4.5M Equipment Scam

McGruber writes "Michael Baxter, the network engineer at the southeastern regional headquarters of Verizon Wireless who submitted hundreds of fraudulent service requests to Cisco, has been sentenced to four years in federal prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Baxter was also ordered to pay $2.3 million in restitution to Cisco Systems, and $462,828 in restitution to Verizon. Instead of placing the replacement parts into service in the Verizon Wireless network, Baxter took the parts home and sold them to third-party re-sellers for his own profit. He used the money to buy cars, jewelry and multiple cosmetic surgeries for his girlfriend."

13 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Company Liable? by Bigby · · Score: 5, Informative

    So when an employee does something great using the company's resources, the company gets the money. But when an employee does something illegal on the company resources, the company doesn't suffer?

    I understand that guy getting something. But Cisco should be suing Verizon, not the person. Verizon would then sue their former employee.

    1. Re:Company Liable? by jmerlin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Listen man, it could've been much worse. He could've pirated some music or a movie, too. He'd have 20 years in prison and owe $50,000,000.

      Sounds to me like he got off pretty easy.

  2. Man, that was stupid... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...incidentally, I don't mean the theft part, which is pretty dumb on its own. What I mean is, he should have been socking that money into Cayman Island accounts (or maybe Venezuelan bank accounts and such), then get out of dodge once he hit the $2m mark or so. Get enough scratch and live in a 3rd-world country that doesn't do extradition, and you can get an entire flock of local women instead of having to throw a ton of money on just one.

    Then again, dunno how much money he himself got, as the $4.5m figure could be what Cisco values the parts to be, which given Cisco's pricing could be as little as three fans and a 6509 power supply w/ SmartNet support. :p

    I am curious as to WTF these guys think when they start pulling stunts like this, however. I mean, if you're gonna flirt with PMITA Prison time, you'd best be damned smart about it, do at least some research, and get your shit planned in advance...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  3. Re:Crime pays by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Id rather be poor and free. 4 years of life is a very long time to me.

    --
    Good-bye
  4. Girlfriend Changelog by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 4, Funny

    cosmetic surgeries for his girlfriend

    Just HOW MUCH does it cost to modify a blow-up doll?

  5. Re:What kind of prison? First? by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he'd held up a convenience store he could easily have gotten 7 mandatory or more

    If he had been the company president and a big political contributor, some poor tech way down the ladder would be facing charges instead. If he was a higher up at Goldman Sachs, he would be given a cabinet position at the white house.

    The guy committed fraud, hardly worth locking him up. Just take his property and garnish his income for the rest of his life, or until the money is paid back.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. Re:What kind of prison? First? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Federal != "white collar". Minimum security == "white collar". My friend's brother got a ten year sentence in Federal prison for loaning money to a dope dealer (as did half his HS graduating class; dealer got busted and set up everyone he knew whether or not they'd ever had anything to do with drugs, dope dealer spent 2 year in Club Fed). Mike's brother was out in five years, and his life was completely ruined. He was a diesel mechanic who worked on big rigs, but of course lost his job. His wife met another man while he was in prison and divorced him. So he's now unemployable and single with few prospects of ever having another woman.

    "Chickenshit sentence"? I hope I've left you a little less ignorant.

  7. Re:What kind of prison? First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've heard the argument made and I disagree. Yes, threatening someone with a weapon causes some very real emotional distress, but of the people I know have been through a robbery in most cases it was so quick that beyond the initial moment of shock it's not something that affects their day to day lives. These "harmless" white collar crimes that involve millions of dollars have the power not only to affect far more than just one person, but to put them through years of anguish. One robbery might scare a clerk shitless for 10 minutes, one mortgage scammer can affect thousands of people, destroy their health, end their marriages, and put their families on the street without ever seeing the victim face to face. At least most robberies are committed out of desperation rather than a sense of greed and entitlement.

  8. This is not the first hit on Verizon... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Verizon has been targeted many times. They would steal network equipment, then call Cisco to get an advance replacement RMA, which would take their stolen equipment and double it. Then they would sell the gear on the 'Grey Market' for Cisco hardware. They focused primarily on Cisco 12000 line cards, where an individual card sells for $100k+ and are installed in a redundant fashion.

    Then they started just getting serial numbers for equipment and starting RMA's for that, and selling it on the Grey market. When Cisco called to get the status on the return... Verizon would reply with "what return".

    I helped track one of these cats back in early 2000's - once he found we were hot on his trail, he abandoned his Bentley, and his Mansion and fled back home to Russia - where he lives currently. Interestingly, this same type of scam popped up in eastern Europe shortly after his relocation.

    Our suspect had a friend who worked in security at one of the Verizon data centers. He would grant 'back-door' access to a facility, and permit the theft of the hardware. Stories abound of this guy being too poor to buy gas one day, borrowing $50 from friends in order to make to to the airport to fly out to New York then from New York to California, then California back home - pulling a massive roll of C notes from his pocket and repaying the $50 loan + a couple of C-notes to show his gratitude.

    Perhaps the reason we hear about this happening with Verizon was that they became aware of the scam early, then kept tracking the perps until they were finally able to catch them. Kudos to Verizon Security for being able to close the loop on this one. These cases are extremely hard to track and crack.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/27/nyregion/27theft.html?_r=2&ex=1152936000&en=28ee4e10417b8e50&ei=5070&oref=login

    http://www.zdnet.com/level-3-falls-victim-to-data-centre-robbery-3039284520/

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:This is not the first hit on Verizon... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if a piece of Cisco network equipment goes down that is covered contractually, they must ship a replacement. With a company as huge as Verizon, there are parts being shipped out *all* the time, and defective parts shipped back *all* the time. If you have 30 days to ship parts back, and the parts don't come back, the procedure is to initiate emails, then escalate from there. Quite often, Verizon gets involved trying to track down the missing parts, trying to solve the mystery - and never is able to resolve the issue until they see a pattern emerge and start to investigate.

      The problem is that when conducting business, you must assume that your counterpart is working with you in good faith. In this instance, you have a man-in-the-middle who is transacting the business and defrauding both parties. It takes some time to find that 'leak', especially when you are doing billions a year in network gear, and RMA's of 10's of millions, and this person is doing fraud in the range of 100k+/yr. Then the person doing the fraud is using disposable phones, disposable numbers, and so tracing the fraud down after-the-fact is even more difficult.

      --
      Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  9. Re:What kind of prison? First? by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but of the people I know have been through a robbery in most cases it was so quick that beyond the initial moment of shock it's not something that affects their day to day lives

    You're experiencing selection bias. It's hard to meet people who have been killed in robberies.

    If you cause a violent confrontation, there is real risk someone gets seriously hurt or killed. They could certainly be injured in a manner that costs society far more than $2.8 million in medical treatment costs over the life of the victim.

    If you steal some equipment, there's a financial loss, but no one is going to get hurt.

    Discouraging people from creating violent situations is far more important than discouraging people from stealing from companies with insufficient controls.

    I'm far more worried about a guy who might point a gun at my head when I'm trying to pick up some milk than I am a guy who is going to steal some hardware when I'm not looking.

  10. It just shows how stupid this guy is. by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have an extra $10,000, buy your girlfriend new boobs.

    If you have an extra $1,000,000, get a hotter girlfriend.

  11. Honey... by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Verizon called. They want their boobs back.