Stanford Study Flawed: Organic Produce May Be More Nutritious After All
assertation writes "A few weeks ago an article was posted to Slashdot referring to a Stanford Study stating that organic produce, contrary to popular belief is not more nutritious. According to Mark Bitman of The New York times the Stanford study was flawed. A spelling error skewed the results as well as the study ignoring several types of nutrients."
Organic produce contains more carbon, which is a rather essential nutrient.
I just won the argument over this with my vegan vegetarian girlfriend. Now this! Damn it, Well, I won't being getting any for awhile. good thing the .XXX search is up.
I ain't gonna even look at these damn articles anymore. I'm gonna stick with cigarettes and chocolate cake.
And coffee.
And bacon. mmmmmm bacon.
"Elizabeth...I'm coming to join ya!"
I am intrigued and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Are you a shill for any number of companies that sell products marked "Organic" for a pretty dramatic mark-up?
In some areas of the country, bull shit is more readily available.
paintball
Next time he's getting some oral favors, he should scream, "OH MY GOD YOU'RE EATING MEAT!"
He'll have to dump her after that, but sometimes there's a price for victory.
paintball