Slashdot Mirror


Laser Strikes On Aircraft Becoming Epidemic

First time accepted submitter AlphaWolf_HK writes "Ars Technica has a story about a 52 year old man who was arrested and sentenced to three years in jail for shining a high powered green laser at a helicopter along with an interesting video showing how he was tracked down. The FBI says that laser strikes are becoming epidemic, saying that they expect to see reports of 3,700 of them this year."

18 of 687 comments (clear)

  1. Sysiphus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make the bastard spend his years in line for the TSA.

  2. Good. by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "sentenced to three years in jail for shining a high powered green laser at a helicopter "

    Good. And since it's a federal crime, he gets to serve 85 percent of that.

    I almost had someone arrested for shining a laser at my friggin' eyes across a bar. But since I knew the person and knew he wasn't "all there" I just confronted him.

    But if it was anyone else, I would have pressed charges. Yes, it's assault.

    There needs to be *at a minimum* public education on this issue, and if nobody is willing to do that, then handheld lasers need to be outright banned for unlicensed individuals. This opinion is unpopular for slashdot, but shit really has gotten out of hand.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Good. by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      We used to have the same problem in Australia. They took the outright ban approach here, it has massively reduced the incidents, not sure if I am in favour of that approach or not, but can't deny it has worked.

    2. Re:Good. by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The last thing this country needs is people actively suggesting ways to strip more freedoms away from the people.

      No, that's the second-last thing this country needs. The last thing this country needs is a bunch of people walking around blind because dumbfucks like to play with pretty lights.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Good. by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you REALLY want to live in a world where what rights you have are decided by someone else? Granted by government? Taken away by government?

      You already live in that world, and so does everyone else. You can claim all you want that your rights are granted by God or Nature, but see how much good it does you to petition God or Nature if and when they are taken away.

      Under Lockean social contract theory, people relinquish some of their primeval rights to live more comfortably within a settled society. That more accurately describes how things work in most of the modern First World. "The Government" isn't supposed to be some alien being; it's supposed to be We, the People, acting collectively to provide the public goods set forth in the Preamble to the Constitution. If We the People decide that banning high-powered lasers without a license is necessary to "insure domestic Tranquility" then that is what is going to happen.

    4. Re:Good. by bonehead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your freedom to swing your fist ends at my face. Your freedom shine a laser ends at my eyes.

      I agree with that 100%.

      What I don't agree with is being forced to have my hands amputated just because having hands would allow me to punch you in the face if I ever felt provoked to do so.

      And, yes, I would rather take the risk that you might someday punch me in the face than to have you undergo involuntary hand amputation, as well.

      The law should deal with actions that people have taken. Not actions that they "could" take.

  3. Re:Find a technical solution, not a legal "solutio by Jahf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually I think a few of these cases getting out and being better known -would- prevent many cases. Face it, this didn't start proliferating as a problem on it's own. People saw the news where a few of these cases happened and though "oh that's funny, I could do that too, no one can catch me". Cases skyrocketed over the last couple of years since the news got posted.

    That same approach can be made to curtail the problem. It just requires an equal amount of energy being put into it.

    The only problem I see with this particular article was that it was very clear just how much of a dumbshit the guy with the laser was. If he had been inside a building or car going from place to place to change where he used the laser from he probably wouldn't have been caught. Likewise had he discarded the laser the second he saw a police car coming, while out of site of the helicopter, chances are fair they wouldn't have found the evidence either.

    What "technical solution" do you see to visible light being shown through a window? And how could you make it commercially viable to every aircraft in the sky? Brainstorm it. If you find something, great, but that's a pretty damned huge problem.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  4. Re:Find a technical solution, not a legal "solutio by pellik · · Score: 5, Funny

    My solution would be to mount even more powerful lasers on some of the aircraft. Fight fire with fire. Plus, it would just be cool.

  5. Re:Find a technical solution, not a legal "solutio by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could certainly make it a combination of technical and legal. For example you make it illegal to manufacture or import a laser of any but a handful of wavelengths. Then install filters for those wavelengths over the cockpit windows. Yes it won't stop everything. But the vast majority of lasers are commercially purchased. If you can't purchase one that will get into a cockpit, problem solved.

    For the ass-hats who insist on building their own and proceed to point it at airplanes and cars, well we can start with two to four charges of assault and go on to three hundred cases of attempted first degree murder. Followed up by a couple hundred civil lawsuits. Not only can they spend the rest of their lives in jail, but they will be bankrupted as well. If they happened to be married -- until their spouse gets a divorce -- joint property for the win. Go ahead and make the wife and kids homeless.

    There is no rational reason why a civil society should have to put up with this kind of shit.

  6. Re:Parental Guidance is a must. by jamesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My young Stepson got one of these (powerful green laser) and I was pretty much blown away at the power of it... I did see when he was unpacking it lots of warnings so I spent some time with him when he first tested it out. So we get outside at night and what is the first thing he tries to do, yep point it a plane flying overhead... so cue the huge boring lecture from me about the danger of these things and how if he gets caught pointing his laser at planes, or cars or people's eyes he will be sent to a boys home... well I think he got the point. The main thing is that kids need to understand the danger of these things and there is a responsibility for parents to keep up with the times and actually understand that "new toy"...

    Aren't there laws against letting kids play with these things? You say "powerful" but don't specify the power, but i'm guessing it's high powered enough that it could blind you. And by young i assume you mean under 12 (or you would have said teenage). Does anyone else see anything wrong with this picture? Kids that age are very likely to go from "hey wouldn't it be funny if..." to actually doing it without thinking it through, regardless of the number of "boring lectures" they've been submitted to. Especially when he's angling to impress a few mates. He doesn't need parental guidance, he needs parental supervision every time the thing comes out of its box. I'd be treating it with similar caution as a gun.

  7. Idiots and lasers = bad combo by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember the time when I bought a HeNe Gas laser back in the 80's to make a spectacular laser show with, for the neighbors. I had no intentions on shining lights on airplanes or innocent people at all.

    And I use lasers all the time in my electronics lab for experimentation.

    Unfortunately, lasers have become so cheap, and super powerful laser-pointers (which has no real world use whatsoever) has become available to the street-kids, so we'll undoubtedly see these lasers become illegal for anyone to possess and own. Including innocent experimenters at home, thanks to the idiots in the streets who just find it fun to point 200mw lasers at anyone.

    5mw is enough for anyone who wants to "play" with a laser pointer, it'll reach several hundred meters, enough to bedazzle the laymen out in the streets, and makes no difference from any 200mw+ laser whatsoever visibly, and furthermore...it won't blind anyone, not destroy pilots sights or policemen etc.

    In fact...not even a 200mw laser will blind ANY pilot, as it is a physical impossibility to hold a 200mw laser beam of any significant distance steady by a human hand, it will shake - it will sway, it will swing...and the atmosphere will pollute and defocus the beam itself so it won't harm anyone.

    Sad...just sad.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  8. Re:I wonder how often this happens by accident by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This wasn't by accident. It didn't "briely pass over an aircraft."

    If you actually watched the video, the laser was pointed directly at the helicopter over a series of minutes. Accidental pointing would have been unlikely for such a period of time, since you need to track the helicopter for that long.

    >Have we slid so far down the slippery slope that something like this will become punishable?

    Your argument is unreasonable and legitimizes the pointing of lasers at people who have lives in their hands.

    >There's some really stupid shit that can get them in big trouble.

    And you can't deliberately point a weapon at whim at a person and not get in big trouble.

    Mens rea was demonstrated in the video. He got done and fairly so.

    --
    BMO

  9. Re:Find a technical solution, not a legal "solutio by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a BEHAVIOR problem. There is no such thing as a technical solution to a behavior problem.

  10. Re:Sorry, but a legal solution is what the govt wa by Grave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lasers are not the problem. The appropriate solution is to label the crime what it is -- attempted murder against the number of people onboard. Have fun with your back to back life sentences for trying to kill 300 people, jackass.

  11. Re:Find a technical solution, not a legal "solutio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Go ahead and make the wife and kids homeless."

    That fact that democracy lets people like you have power over me is fucking terrifying.

  12. Re:Sorry, but a legal solution is what the govt wa by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice strawman. Murder or attempted murder requires mens rea. Most people who do this are not trying to kill anyone. They're just being idiots.

    Reckless endangerment, sure. Attempted murder? Good luck getting that to stick. You'd be laughed out of court.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  13. Re:technical solution already available -- goggles by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why make them wear goggles? Apply the film to the windshield.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. Re:Sorry, but a legal solution is what the govt wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If someone is an idiot and thinks it would be funny to shoot a gun into a crowd it's still attempted murder.