Slashdot Mirror


Prefab Greenhouse + Ardunio Controls = Automated Agriculture (Video)

Sam Bagot and Will Bratton operate Horto Domi (hortodomi.com), an agricultural project they describe as "beyond organic." They're working with small prefab greenhouses, adding sensors and Arduino-actuated controls, and even including an earthworm breeding area in most domes, because earthworms are good for the soil and can increase plant production. If you're the kind of person whose plants always seem to shrivel up and die, this may be a great way to garden. With watering and other functions automated, it looks like all you have to do is set your controls, plant what you want to grow, and wait for the "time to harvest" alarm to go off. Okay, it might not be that simple, but Sam and Will say their gardening method saves a lot of energy and time. It also looks like fun, besides being an easy way to grow your own 100% organic fruits and vegetables.

7 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It's so "beyond" organic... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not really ... at the end of the day it's just a greenhouse with some fancy bits thrown in. My father's greenhouse has some temperature sensitive pneumatic (hydraulic?) arms which will open and close the roof to regulate the temperature.

    For purposes of food, it simply means no pesticides and other things. You're not actually going to eat the Arduinos one assumes.

    Organic doesn't mean luddite, it means cutting out the chemicals and other stuff.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Reminds me of the ``Biotron'' ads from the '70s by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (no, not for the Micronaut)

    Kind of begs the question --- how would homesteading look w/ 21st century technology? How much land does one need for a self-sufficient existence for a family of 4?

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Reminds me of the ``Biotron'' ads from the '70s by drgould · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Like this.

      The Dervaes family of four produces 6000 lbs of organic food annually on 1/10 of an acre located just 15 minutes from downtown Los Angeles.

  3. Re:Wont scale by cod3r_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    come to think of it those 2 guys look like a couple of pot heads. Think I'm starting to understand their objective with this project.

  4. Re:Arduino = obnoxious by Nemesisghost · · Score: 4, Funny

    So why don't you put something together, with your non-Arduino knowledge, that automates the old man screaming at the kids to "Get off my lawn".

  5. Feedback on presentation by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot, here's some feedback for making better videos.

    In comparison to other slashdot videos, this one's OK, and it could be a better. Without commenting on the content or participants or video production (which other people can do), here's some notes about presentation:

    Repeat until memorized:

    1. Audio is for talk
    2. Slides are for charts
    3. Video is for action

    Having a video of talking heads/talking people is the wrong way to present. Watching people talk is boring! Use the right technology in the right way for maximum interest.

    A short clip of people talking will establish the context and make a personal connection with the viewer. Then cutting to illustrative videos while they talk makes a stronger, clearer presentation of the information.

    (Also, briefly cut back to the people talking to reestablish context between subjects. Talking heads aren't forbidden, but using talking heads to present verbal information is bad form.)

    When the video finally cuts away from the talking heads, it doesn't track the speech! Talk about the dome size, type, materials, area, earthworms is dubbed over a video of the controller box. The audio doesn't match the video, and it makes no sense.

    Choose video clips which correspond to and illustrate the talk, this serves to present the information in two ways (video and audio) for better impact.

    What's the point of the picture-in-picture at the beginning? It's arty and establishes the context (ie - growing things), but context is established after 5 seconds or so. What's the point of PIP for 45 seconds? You're crippling the presentation for no purpose.

    The subject and content is pretty good. The people interviewed give a surprisingly good talk, given that this was probably off-the-cuff and they're not professional presenters. No problems there.

    The content was a little shallow - it's more of an advertizing brochure with no detail. I would have liked to hear more about the nuts-and-bolts of what they are doing: their controller box, how things connect, what micros/sensors/interfaces they use, how the dome is built, what materials to use, assembly, &c. I know it's in the link, but this is a web site for people interested in tech, and since tech is what will get people interested in their site, you should explore it.

    Overall the quality of video posts is improving. Keep up the good work, and keep on making it better.

  6. Re:Wont scale by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't scale it up, scale it DOWN. Get this to window ledge sized, add 50 million apartment dwellers replacing a part of their food budget, and you've just increased food security while decreasing the carbon emissions with traditional farming, while decreasing obesity and increasing fresh food consumption.

    Don't think mainframe replacement- think personal greenhouse.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.