Slashdot Mirror


The UAE Claims To Hold the Worlds Largest Biometric Database

another random user writes "The United Arab Emirates holds the largest biometric database in the world, the Emirates Identity Authority has announced. The population register of Emirates ID has over 103 million digital fingerprints and over 15 million digital facial recognition records, which includes multiple records of each UAE resident, and digital signatures as of October 11, senior officials said. Dr. Ali Al Khoury, Director General of Emirates ID, said the authority has submitted an official application to the World Record Academy to recognize this record. Asked about the confirmation of the authority's claims about the world record, an official spokesman of the authority told Gulf News on Sunday: 'We have made worldwide surveys and inquiries with the similar official authorities and agencies of the world governments holding such databases and confirmed that our database is the largest. The World Record Academy also confirmed to us that no other government or authority has made a similar claim for such a record,' he said."

53 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. And they're proud of this because....? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok...this is a bragging rights type thing somehow??

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      No one told them that bigger isn't always better.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to mention, It seems it's completely NOT the largest.

      http://www.infowars.com/indias-gargantuan-biometric-database-raises-big-questions/

    3. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      In this case, it's also not just the size that counts, but also how they use it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      UAE has best Biometric Database in world. All other countries' Biometic Databases are inferior.

    5. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by cvtan · · Score: 1

      They make themselves look like little kids bragging about who's got the biggest lollypop. Don't grown-ups know they shouldn't do this? Are we supposed to be impressed because they've done a questionable thing in a big way? Clearly, I am not culturally sensitive and the diversity training I took at the Big Yellow Box has failed.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    6. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok...this is a bragging rights type thing somehow??

      Most telling is that they seem to think so... It's akin to vying for the title of "world's largest landfill", it sounds too much like a story from The Onion.

    7. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I wonder if they should have stepped back and thought WWTPD....

      (What Would The Prophet Do)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      They seem to like bigger because they can. At least that's what it looks like to the outside observer.

    9. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by ericloewe · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since "declare holy war" is high up on the list, let's not give them any ideas.

    10. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gotta go with Facebook and facial recognition software for the win.

      One. Billion. Users.

    11. Re:And they're proud of this because....? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up. This was my exact reaction.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  2. Haha by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no other government or authority has made a similar claim for such a record

    Other governments, that may be sued for doing this, are just not advertising their databases.

    1. Re:Haha by aralin · · Score: 1, Interesting

      US will fingerprint and photograph every single person crossing its borders. Either all the travel is done by a small group of people, or more likely their database is much, much larger than UAE. Definitely the facial recognition records, but very likely also on the fingerprints.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    2. Re:Haha by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      US will fingerprint and photograph every single person crossing its borders.

      No kidding? Apparently I missed that when I re-entered the U.S. two days ago, but I'm sure they must be doing it at every other border point in the U.S.. Or maybe they just overlooked me in the crowd? After all, there were hundreds of us lined up with customs declaration forms and passports ready to show...though, now that I think of it, none of them were getting fingerprinted or photographed either. Nor have I ever been fingerprinted in my entire life, now that I think of it. How very odd that I seem to have missed out on it every time I've crossed the U.S. border.

      That said, considering how many people have been booked for criminal offenses in the U.S. over the years, it wouldn't surprise me if it did have a larger biometric database, though that wouldn't exactly be a bragging point.

    3. Re:Haha by anarcobra · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USA fingerprints every foreigner entering the country (at least at airports).
      This policy is nothing new, and has been in place for some years now.

    4. Re:Haha by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 1

      Strange, I am a Canadian citizen who flew from Toronto, Canada to California in August and I was not fingerprinted at all. Perhaps it's only people who are from non-NAFTA countries?

      --
      Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    5. Re:Haha by anarcobra · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure.
      I'm Dutch and I flew to the USA last year and I was fingerprinted.
      So were most of the other people on that flight.

    6. Re:Haha by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      It depends on your visa and the consulate that issued the visa, actually. The aim is not to get your fingerprints when you enter the US, but to verify that you are the person the visa was issued for. The Canadian GP probably never needed a visa, and there was nothing to verify through finger prints.

    7. Re:Haha by isorox · · Score: 2

      Strange, I am a Canadian citizen who flew from Toronto, Canada to California in August and I was not fingerprinted at all. Perhaps it's only people who are from non-NAFTA countries?

      You'd have cleared US immigration in Toronto, didn't you get scanned there?

      This year, as a UK passport holder, I've travelled to India, Russia, Israel, Gaza, St Lucia, Indonsedia, Singapore, The U.S, UK, various european countries, and probably a couple of other places I've forgotten.

      Only the U.S. takes my fingerprints.

    8. Re:Haha by skegg · · Score: 1

      Other governments, that may be sued for doing this, are just not advertising their databases.

      Very true. With a population of ~22 million, Australia would have to have about the same number (15 million?) digital facial recognition records.
      Every driver's licence carries a clear photo of the holder.

      On a side-topic, bars and pubs are increasingly installing ID scanners as a condition of entry. The 2 reasons they float are (i) so that if there is ever any trouble they can link poor-CCTV footage to a high-quality licence photo (and identity); and (ii) so that if you're banned from one bar/pub you can't enter another.

      Of course, the information collected will never be used for any other purpose.

    9. Re:Haha by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Canada is exempt because if every Canadian had to be fingerprinted at the land crossings the border (and hundreds of billions in commerce) would screech to a halt.

      Not sure about Mexicans.

    10. Re:Haha by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      It's not dependent on the visa. People from visa waiver nations (such as the UK, Germany, Japan, etc) will still get enrolled into US-VISIT (the photograph/fingerprinting system.)

      Canadians have a special exemption.

  3. Oh great by mr1911 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now the Dept. of Homeland Security will think it is a contest. More rights violations in 3, 2, ...

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    1. Re:Oh great by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      (Replying to undo incorrect moderation.)

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  4. I knew it! by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Funny

    I KNEW those amiga fanbois were up to something! All this time their precious UAE was silently gathering damning personal biometric information on their users, hoping to shame them away from PCs running windows, MacOS and Linux!

    Wait.. what? United Arab Emerates? Not Ubiqutious Amiga Emulator?

    Wait, what? Nothing to do with amiga users at all? Sir, do you know what site this is!? Honestly, what is this world coming to!

    [Note for the humor deprived: there has been so much bullshit pertaining to the middle east lately that I felt some humor was warranted. Deal with it.]

    1. Re:I knew it! by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      If only the region learned to laugh without it being because we keep paying them...

    2. Re:I knew it! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Careful with that, they tend to riot whenever people poke fun at them.

  5. ...good for you, yours is bigger by Baloroth · · Score: 1

    But seriously, why would they think that any serious organization that had such a database (like the NSA, for example) would bother registering it with the "The World Record Academy"? A database like that is supposed to be used for something. Simply being the biggest is no more impressive than the biggest ball of twine in the world. I'd be much more interested if it was the fastest, because scanning a database that large for biometric matches is probably not going to be easy.

    This "news" just sounds like someone is hungry for attention.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  6. Who reports this stuff? by NinjaTekNeeks · · Score: 2

    I doubt they have China or the US beat. Hell, I'd venture the Casino's in Macau or Las Vegas even have that beat. They just don't report it because an accolade like a world record in this field is useless and frankly not earning you any high fives from the public either.

  7. Re:Not something to brag about by N!k0N · · Score: 1

    At least they didn't win the world record for most 1984-like regime.

    The Thought Police will be formed shortly...

  8. The race to Big Brother State is off and running by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    At some point the light should go off in everyone's head to see where governments are going with this. It'll probably be too late, but at least we will realize what happened... But then what?

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  9. The 3 best groups to scam by feedayeen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Professional athletes, those who've inherited their fortune, and Saudi royalty:

    Athletes earned their wealth by virtue of a genetic lottery and countless hours of physical training.
    Those who've inherited 'old money' have never struggled in their lives and often live in a bubble.
    The Saudi royalty just dug a hole in the ground and discovered a gold mine.

    I think somebody just offered to sell them, 'THE WORLD'S LARGEST biometric database' and somebody said sure, I don't have one of those.

  10. A dubious distinction by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Kind of a dubious distinction. Like having the world record for number of gulags, or something.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:A dubious distinction by xtal · · Score: 2

      or largest number of people locked up, say..

      --
      ..don't panic
  11. There's a reason by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    The UAE's native population is vastly outnumbered by imported workers.

    There's about 1 million natives and about 7 million foreigners.
    A small fraction of those 7 million foreigners are white collar, with the rest being cheap labor

    Almost all of the labor force is male and the government was scared shitless the last time the workers got upset and started striking.
    It's no surprise that they want to build a database of the immigrant workers.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:There's a reason by ilguido · · Score: 2

      Don't amass millions of quasi-slaves then.

  12. Do we know tha the "Emirs" are stable? by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

    If this data got in the wrong hands, it could be a HUGE boon to identity theft syndicates. What if UAE undergoes its own "Arab Spring" coup to overthrow the hereditary "Emirs" who run the country? How do we know if all this data they have is secure? How many thousands of fake passports could be made by using this data, giving middle eastern extremists easy access to international travel?

    1. Re:Do we know tha the "Emirs" are stable? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      If that were to happen, you can bet their passports would suddenly no longer be accepted until a solution was found.

  13. Population is only 8 million by robot5x · · Score: 2

    Without wishing to collude in this gigantic one-upmanship-fest...

    Total population of UAE is around 8 million (estimate - 2005 census it was actually 4 million).

    TFA specifically says the records are UAE residents so we aren't talking about huge numbers of transiting air passengers or tourists.

    So - how the hell do these numbers add up? If there are now 102 million fingerprint records, has every resident been digitally fingerprinted 12 times?? If there are 15 million facial records, has every resident in the country been imaged twice on average???

    If all this is true, UAE should be commended not for the size of their gigantic database, but for a logistical and planning operation on a par with the holocaust.

    --
    Hej! Nasi tu byli!
    1. Re:Population is only 8 million by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Don't you think it's a bit early for a holocaust comparison?

  14. USA must have more... by idji · · Score: 1

    Far more than 32 million foreigners enter the USA every year wiki, and they take digital photos and fingerprints.

  15. How to size a biometric DB, EUA not the largest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In Mexico, the IFE (electoral office) has 40 millions fingerprints records with two fingerprints per person, so it's 80M fingerprints. Also the IFE have 90M face mugshot - there is a delta of 50M person with only face mugshot and no fingerprint. EUA as a population of less than 10M persons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Emirates) and they take a tenprint for ID and passport (plus iris - burka situation!), add the foreing resident and workers, you reach the +100M fingerprint (100 fingerprints / 10 fingerprints per person = 10M individual records). The FBI as today have more than 80M tenprint records (criminals of course, and all background checks, school teachers, federal government employees....) - do the math!!!

  16. Clearly a false claim by aglider · · Score: 1

    The Chinese government has a database which is larger by 1 order of magnitude.
    It's only that none knows anything about it.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  17. Welcome to the UAE by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Mr. Yamamoto

    --
    Nullius in verba
  18. Anti tourism tactics by epSos-de · · Score: 1

    Someone should tell him that the people are actually interested in privacy. He sounds like a pervert who is bragging about his collection of secret photos that he took from a safe distance.

  19. Re:The race to Big Brother State is off and runnin by lennier · · Score: 1

    At some point the light should go off in everyone's head

    ... because they'd left their mind open, but now it's safely closed again?

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  20. GP is correct by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The GP is correct. On entering the US, only Americans and Canadians can skip the fingerprints. It's been this way for at least a few years. You need to get out of your bubble.

    1. Re:GP is correct by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the GP needs to not make overgeneralizations that are incorrect instead? That was kinda my point.

  21. A dangerous database by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

    Some time back, a major Internet player - I forget who but it might have been LinkedIn - had a breech where millions of passwords were stolen (I'm sure somebody here can fill in the details).

    At first, this breach would only seem to be of concern to people who used that service; their accounts were suddenly vulnerable because their passwords were no longer secret. But this breach had even more wide-spread implications than that; suddenly the black-hats had a new and very powerful tool for cracking other systems: a real-world data-dump of live passwords. This not only improved their "dictionary" for brute-force attacks, but also allowed them to create better rules for their cracking tools on which passwords were more likely to be used, thanks to the information they gleaned from these leaks. Cracking live systems became much easier because their tools could give priority to real-life examples rather than blindly attempting every possible permutation.

    Now, the situation with the UAE biometric database is not exactly the same, but a lesson should be learned from the password-breeches of the past few years: the value of the information in those databases is more than simply access to whatever locks they control. It can be used - and will be used - in unexpected ways. I can't say I'm smart enough to guess what those ways are (if I was, I probably wouldn't be posting on slashdot), and whatever new technologies are developed with that information are not necessarily evil. But because it is tied so closely to the identity of real people, that information can be very powerful and very dangerous.

    Not only should there be safeguards to ensure this information is only collected by responsible parties, but there need to be protections on this information so it does not get released into the wild. Because you can bet that its not only the (supposedly) white-hats interested in this sort of stuff. WE should not be blindly accepting of biometrics (or indeed, any centralization of vital information on people) simply because of the convenience it adds to our lives; there is probably a cost in the long run.

  22. Whatever by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I hope Iran wins the war!

  23. It's not going to save them by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    Pffffftttt... It's not going to save them from the jihadis . Democracy, not DNA , is the only thing that's going to stop the jihadis from toppling Saudi and the UAE.

    Of cource, hereditary absolute monarchists aren't much interested in that fact....

  24. India ... UIDAI by lordbyron · · Score: 1

    Well they would just be plain wrong. UID has over 250 million people all 10 fingerprints both iris and a facial scan and is growing by almost 1 million per day. So clearly UAE is not looking very hard.