Slashdot Mirror
Democracy Now Asks Third Party Candidates Questions From Last Night's Debate
As they did with the first debate, Democracy Now has published the debate questions answered by third party candidates. Jill Stein (Green), Virgil Goode (Constitution), and Rocky Anderson (Justice) were present. There's a (long) video with the answers spliced in, and (thankfully) a transcript of all their answers. Gary Johnson was not present, but you can catch him debating Jill Stein Thursday October 18th at 7 p.m. EDT.
Mittens respects neither freedom nor responsibility.
Mitt Romney is the crony capitalist candidate. So is Barack Obama. Two parties, one agenda.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Why do the parties always go for the big prize? It's like a high school student wanting to become the CEO of IBM immediately after graduating.
Even if they do win, then what? they will have zero support from either of the parties that dominate the congress.
If a 3rd party wants to be taken seriously start at the bottom. city councilor, mayor, state senator, work your way up, then people will see what you really believe in and have a track record... and while you are at it get more of "your party" elected to those roles as well.
This is one case of "go big or go home" doesn't work, it just means you are going home empty handed
Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
I watched this debate, and none of the questions were even worth answering. Not one question was asked about civil liberties. Not one question about the TSA, or drug policy, or drone strikes. Not one mention of science. Not one question addressed the regulatory capture of just about every government agency. Not one question about Obama's failure to prosecute any banking execs for fraud after the 2008 financial crisis. Absolutely no worthwhile questions were asked, and no worthwhile answers were given.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
The greens are starting at the bottom. There have been 136 green party members elected to local office, 3 elected to state offices (all no longer serving), and 0 elected to federal offices.
Participation in the presidential election builds name recognition and motivation for the party, improving their chances at lower offices even if the presidency is hopeless.
You could say the same about Obama and the left wing of the Democratic party. Failing to implement a single progressive policy hasn't seemed to hurt his support.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Keep your army within your borders. That would be a pretty fucking good foreign policy.
Romney is a NEO-conservative. Republicans support almost none of this.
1. A libertarian would never impose a state religion, state funding for or special tax breaks for religious institutions.
2. He would most likely support some spending for defense, but he would not waste the money on useless 'police actions' that lack congressional oversight.
3. he would also not hesitate to declare war to defend ourselves but he would do it by the book (as a congressman or senator).
4. A libertarian would not impose restrictions on healthcare for ideological reasons (such as abortion) but would also oppose state funding for it.
5. he would demand heavy restrictions on self-instancing of state power.
6. he would defend our constitutional rights, even if their use makes insecure control freaks butthurt.