Slashdot Mirror


New Evidence That the Moon Was Created In a Massive Collision

derekmead writes "New evidence that the giant impact hypothesis is correct: A paper published today in Nature shares findings of a chemical analysis of Moon rocks that shows fractional differences between the makeup of the Earth and Moon that most likely were caused by the collision between Earth and a Mars-sized planet around 4.5 billion years ago. Although the two are quite similar, it's been previously shown that Moon rocks lack volatile elements, which suggests they may have evaporated during the incredibly intense heat and pressure created during an impact event. But if the hypothesis that light elements actually evaporated from Moon rocks during their formation is correct, you'd expect to find evidence of elements being layered by mass — heavier elements would condense first, and so on. That process is known as isotopic fractionation — a concept central to carbon dating — and the Washington University team's results suggest they found exactly that (abstract). They compared the blend of zinc isotopes in Moon rocks and Earth samples, and found that the Moon rocks held slightly higher proportions of heavier zinc isotopes. If the Moon was indeed once part of Earth — which has been shown by extensive modeling (PDF) — the difference in the balance of zinc profiles would most likely be explained by lighter zinc isotopes evaporating away following a collision."

4 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Old news? by Laxori666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You insensitive clod! The invisible pink unicorn is a demon implanted into the minds of credulous cretins by the Flying Spaghetti Monster to test our faith! Obviously the FSM, his spaghetiness be praised, was the one who created the moon by spontaneously generating a meatball and applying his large-body creation sauce to it. o one listen to parent - he is a deluded fool.

  2. Re:Doesn't anyone think... by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can read about the reason for the moon's spherical shape here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatic_equilibrium#Planetary_geology

    It's fairly straightforward, nothing at all like Quantum mechanics.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  3. Re:Size of Earth? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 4, Informative

    Considering it took a Mars-sized object to cause the collision event, and that a pretty substantial amount of mass would have been blasted away at escape velocity, I'm not sure the veracity of your math.

    Of course, you might be roughly right, but probably not for the reasons I think you're implying...

  4. Re:Doesn't anyone think... by war4peace · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suppose you're a troll as well, but to hell with it, I'll bite.
    Any celestial body large enough to have a sizable gravity (I am sure there's a threshold formula somewhere, but CBA to check) will take, in time, a spherical shape because of... GRAVITY! (applause in the background)

    http://www.pa.msu.edu/sciencet/ask_st/031198.html

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)