Slashdot Mirror


How Hair Can be Used To Track Where You've Been

First time accepted submitter kandelar writes "PBS recently ran a story about how some scientists are using human hair to trace where a person has been. The combinations of different isotopes in water make for somewhat unique signatures from place to place. These isotopes get placed in growing hair strands which can then be traced back to identify where a person has been."

133 comments

  1. This has been done for years. by ls671 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been done for year, it isn't a new concept.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:This has been done for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For year!!

    2. Re:This has been done for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But doesn't it make you feel more secure knowing that we CAN do this even though we DON'T because it's utterly impractical?

    3. Re:This has been done for years. by rockout · · Score: 0

      I even heard about it in 1991 from a very reliable source: Johnny Utah

      "The beaches are always being closed because of waste spills, right? And surfers are territorial, they stick to certain breaks. If we can get some hair samples, and get a match to a certain beach, we'd know which break the Ex-Presidents surf. You buyin' this?"

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    4. Re:This has been done for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit i've seen this in EVERY CSI show so far. Not to mention NCIS and all that jazz.

    5. Re:This has been done for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and "Bones" !

      Don't forget "Bones"!!!

    6. Re:This has been done for years. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      This has been done for year, it isn't a new concept.

      For example, on Ötzi the Iceman.

      Going in the opposite direction, I know EXACTLY where the cat has been. How can one small animal shed so much?

    7. Re:This has been done for years. by larry+bagina · · Score: 0

      I recommend you shave your pussy.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    8. Re:This has been done for years. by rhsanborn · · Score: 2

      I wonder how things like bottled water, soda, beer affect the results. Does it suddenly look like I spent time in Kentucky because I drink bourbon?

  2. Wooo hooo by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bald people no longer need a tinfoil hat?

    1. Re:Wooo hooo by jhoegl · · Score: 2

      Remember to shave your pubes!

    2. Re:Wooo hooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and, as the technique is likely to be adaptable, rip out your nails.

    3. Re:Wooo hooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that pretty much anything that applies to testing of hear applies to all hair and nails. Pubic hair works just as well as hair from your head or arm, its just generally shorter. Ask anyone who has had a REAL drug test (not the easily fakable piss in a cup type) If you don't have any hair on your body, they can just clip your nails and get a longer history.

      --BitZtream

    4. Re:Wooo hooo by HnT · · Score: 1

      Instead tinfoil bodysuits for everyone!

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Wooo hooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My baldness let's you know exactly where I've been.

      I've been in HELL! For YEARS!

    6. Re:Wooo hooo by trout007 · · Score: 1

      If you are bald you just might be a terrorist.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    7. Re:Wooo hooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh!, I guess that's why they are pulling nails...

    8. Re:Wooo hooo by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      This explains why porn stars are all completely shaved. *nobody* needs to know exactly where those body parts have been.

  3. Perrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My hair would say I've been in southern France for a long time.

    1. Re:Perrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ãd like to see your face when they tell youÂve been drinking bottled tap water al along.

    2. Re:Perrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dasani, yes. Perrier, no.

    3. Re:Perrier by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Is all the food you eat cooked with Perrier?

  4. food sources distort results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We eat food and drink water.
    Food comes from multiple sources, some transported large distances.
    This will distort results significently and reduce the accuracy of the claimed results.

    1. Re:food sources distort results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article covers this. Most products are made with local water. But even if it isn't local (coke bottled 3 states away) as long as your neighbors are drinking the same thing it will still place you in that area.

    2. Re:food sources distort results by bmo · · Score: 2

      > Most products are made with local water.

      You haven't been in a supermarket in 30 years, have you?

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:food sources distort results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, have you? Most foot is processed locally even if its from some multi-national company.

      Shipping food a long way is almost universally too expensive to work. Some veggies make long trips due to seasons but anything with a large amount of liquid in it gets made fairly close to you. Your drinks and things such as milk, juices and all that that come from concentrate are made with water very close to you. Pepsi may be 'born in Carolina' but in San Francisco its made with water from California.

      Juices are reduced to concentrates where possible, shipped, then have water added locally.

      Pick up pretty much anything and take a look at where its 'bottled'. It won't be that far away as a general rule unless its something high dollar and/or rare.

      All of your meat and dairy products are local for the most part, even when you get ripped off and by 'Kobe beef'.

      --BitZtream

    4. Re:food sources distort results by lostfayth · · Score: 2

      Most of the Pepsi bottles I've ever seen were bottled in Mississauga, Ontario... That's not exactly local to where I lived, in Boston, MA. That's the wrong country, entirely. I assume it's the same all over New England, at least.

    5. Re:food sources distort results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The AC specifically said, "Some veggies make long trips due to seasons". Just sayin'.

    6. Re:food sources distort results by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

      There are other bottling facilities in New England. Pepsi has one in Cranston, RI. Coke has one in Londonderry, NH.

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    7. Re:food sources distort results by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      No but...

      A) As pointed out, many veggies do travel due to seasons
      B) Water content of veggies is unlikely to be a significant portion of the water you ingest
      C) Likely most people in your area eat vegetables from the same variety of sources that you do, so its concievable that this factor would not be a significant obstacle and may even factor into any such profile.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:food sources distort results by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      "Local" is relative.

      For instance, I lived in a town years ago of about 10k people ('regional' population center). They had their own Coke and Pepsi bottling facilities. They were small facilities but presumably everything was done there for the region/area. Presumably, this is done in most places; I know I've got a "Pepsi Bottling Group" facility here (as well as a large Coca Cola facility of some sort as well); it's near an area where a great number of private wells are sunk, so presumably they're pulling their water off-grid, so to speak.

      Between CocaCola and Pepsi, the number of drinks available in the supermarket are fairly negligible: they own most brands nowadays, it seems. So while some drinks need to be shipped in, the vast majority of the drinks are bottled using local water. It makes sense: you cut down on your distribution transportation costs markedly (50% as expensive? 80%?) by just having to ship the syrup and bottles/cans. Water is heavy and very common, why ship it? (That's probably why 'bottled water' never comes from where it's claimed to come from - it's too expensive to ship.)

      That said, there are also people who run their drinking water through RO etc. filters, some who completely denurture their water and then add an off-the-shelf mineral additive, etc. - not common, but I'm sure that they would, with global distribution of foods, skew the scales a bit.

      Also, Southern France has a lot of wine. Maybe that's what he was referring to?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:food sources distort results by bmo · · Score: 1

      >B) Water content of veggies is unlikely to be a significant portion of the water you ingest

      Water is water. It is H20. Dihydrogen Monoxide.

      All else is not water.

      Vegetables and fruits contain water. They also contain the minerals that they grew in, in different ratios and concentrations depending on the location. Oenophiles take this into account when they talk about terroir.

      You are waving your hands and saying that this doesn't matter, which is BS.

      --
      BMO

    10. Re:food sources distort results by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually I said its probably not a major obstacle.... you are ignoring the fact that most people eat foods from the same sources.... so all you are doing is pointing out more factors which will be part of the baseline.

      The whole question here is really, can we use local factors against such a baseline to infer where a person has traveled. It looks to me like more of a signal to noise ratio issue. To which your points look more like something that would induce bias than noise.

      Admittedly there could be quite a lot of noise and this could, in fact, be infeasible. However, I don't see the composition of the food which everyone is eating, being a major obstacle.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  5. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drink exclusively Perrier, so the cops think I was in Vergèze in the Gard département of France the whole time.

    1. Re:Really? by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or some local reservoir near the Perrier bottling factory in China

    2. Re:Really? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Most soft drinks are bottled locally or, for certain parts of the world, in a nearby country.
      Perrier has three bottling plants in the US of A, though you can buy French bottles if you go looking for them.

      AFAIK, Perrier doesn't have a bottling plant in China, since the vast majority of the fresh water is polluted.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since when did a bit of pollution matter to Perrier?

      According to your link, pollution seems to matter quite a lot to Perrier, quotes from your link, emphasis mine:

      Perrier is "voluntarily recalling its entire inventory of Perrier from store shelves throughout the United States after tests showed the presence of the chemical benzene in a small sample of bottles."

      The danger? " if you consumed about 16 fluid ounces a day, your lifetime risk of cancer might increase by one in a million"

      How Pollution free is Perrier? "The impurity was discovered in North Carolina by county officials who so prized the purity of Perrier that they used it as a standard in tests of other water supplies."

      Discalimer, I live in a country with a good clean water supply, so I don't really have a pony in this race.

    4. Re:Really? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I drink exclusively Perrier, so the cops think I was in Vergèze in the Gard département of France the whole time.

      Perrier has a plant in ZephryHills Florida. You could be drinking Tampa tapwater, since they're both using the Hillsborough River.

  6. Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you eat imported food and (imported) bottled - where have you 'been'

  7. And we snobs have the last laugh... by russotto · · Score: 1

    They laughed at me when I would drink nothing but Evian or, in a pinch, Perrier. Now my hair proves nothing about where I've been.

    1. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Genda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm, we take a small snip of your hair, we find sea salt and silica dust, a spandex fiber, traces of sunblock and tanning lotion and a tiny crumb from a hotdog bun. Looking at all these elements and their isotopes we can say without a doubt, you spent Sunday at Venice Beach. Oh, and the smaller traces of Avian and Perrier tell us you think you're a snob and have no imagination. Haven't you ever heard of Badoit or Volvic? OH! and a flea! You have a dog.

    2. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I still laugh at you, bottle snob

    3. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by similar_name · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what Evian spells backwards? ;)

    4. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I dont

    5. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it Nivea?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    6. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      I think it's Avian. Everyone knows that birds make the best water.

    7. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naive :-)

    8. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know what Evian spells backwards? ;)

      From snopes: "The company that brought Evian water to market began as a small glassworks operation and grew to become the world's biggest maker of dairy products and bottled water, taking its name from the town the spring was situated in, Evian-les-Bains. So, while "evian" is certainly "naive" spelled backwards, the choice of appellation was not dictated by a desire to take a meanspirited swipe at foolheaded consumers."

      Link: http://www.snopes.com/business/names/evian.asp

    9. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Well I'll be damned!

    10. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      That Evian is crap frogwater. Ssabmud from Sweden is what real men drink!

    11. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Even the French don't drink much Evian.
      Spring water, such as Cristaline, is actually more popular.

    12. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Obvious!

    13. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah -- you think it forms a word, "naive". But it's a little known fact that "naive" is not in any English dictionary.

    14. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what Evian spells backwards? ;)

      In French, nothing. Naïve has a diaeresis. (Slashcode will probably garble it.)

    15. Re:And we snobs have the last laugh... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Of course, I knew that, and have actually been to Evian-les-Bains. As my hair would show.

  8. There needs to be a science fiction story by WillAdams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    where the protagonists are would-be thieves or revolutionaries who seem to have all the superstitiousness of medieval peasants, but it turns out that it's merely behaviour to defend against such high-tech genetic snooping.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:There needs to be a science fiction story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay:

      Thomas Baker wasn't really anxious, he had been through so many checkpoints so many times he just mechanically held out his arm while the guard passed a device over it. It had been a pretty uneventful day in his largely boring life, largely so because Thomas was a model citizen. That night however he never saw it coming. The guard elbowed him straight into the face and a sharp blow to this head from behind dropped him onto the ground. There they kicked him senseless and tasered him. Days later at the detention center Thomas slowly began to see again through his right eye that had swollen shut from the brutal beating he received at the checkpoint. No charges, no indictment, no jury, no trial and no verdict. Thomas never found out just why he was arrested and beaten to a living pulp that night, but the doctor giving him the lethal injection that night told him, "You know, you really deserve to die, you scum!".

  9. I knew a... by Genda · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red headed girl who was able to accurately identify where her boyfriend has been when she discovered a blond pubic hair in his briefs... he wasn't blond. I believe this technology has been around for a while now.

    1. Re:I knew a... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That just proves someone else may have been wearing his undies.

    2. Re:I knew a... by Genda · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's right Sweety, I was just being a gentleman... I was driving home and bam there she was running down the street with her pants on fire, so I stopped the car, ran out, and patted her out then gallantly offered her my briefs. She looked cold! I asked her if she needed to go to the hospital, and she said no, just home, so I took her home, and got my briefs back, and that's how the pubic hair got there. I guess I'm just a Boy Scout at heart!

      Unless there's a kinky thief going around borrowing people's panties, you gotta tap dance real hard to keep from catching a frying pan with your face

    3. Re:I knew a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically the tech in question is the reverse of what you suggested.

      More along the lines of if you came home and found a.. uhm... "sticky substance" in your significant others' hair.

  10. Where I've been? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Work,
    Home,
    Work,
    Home, Supermarket, Wine bar,
    Work,
    Home,
    Work,
    Home,
    Home,
    Work,
    etc.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Where I've been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is more like a city level of resolution.

      Your record would look more like
      >Hometown
      >Napa?

    2. Re:Where I've been? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Nah, Willamette Valley. It's like Napa, but you can afford to live there.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Where I've been? by SuperQ · · Score: 2

      The fact that the guess was within 500 miles is kinda amazing.

    4. Re:Where I've been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since miles are a fantasy unit of measurement!

  11. Travels betrayed, locals inconclusive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This could have an interesting impact on cold cases. Fortunately, I expect this will quickly find disgrace like previous forms of hair and fiber analysis.

    Globalization has made the world much smaller, with most goods mass produced in such volume with such great consistency that matches are increasingly probable.

  12. I am skeptical by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I say that because this kind of technology has been around for many years. But hair or otherwise, location by isotope has so far turned out to be a boondoggle.

    For example, for years TV shows (and the FBI themselves) claimed that they could trace ammunition to the manufacturer by the particular isotopic composition of the lead in bullet fragments.

    False. It just isn't reliable. They did it for years, and it just doesn't work. The better the technology got, the more unreliable it was shown to be. Lead formulations change; suppliers change; the very ore from which the lead is refined, varies even from the same mine. Convictions were overturned.

    In some ways, it parallels the evolution of DNA as evidence: it is far, far less reliable than it was first made out to be. Not only is it ridiculously easily contaminated, it can be deliberately planted, even more easily.

    1. Re:I am skeptical by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Lead formulations change; suppliers change; the very ore from which the lead is refined, varies even from the same mine. Convictions were overturned.

      Obviously there are major problems with trying to link hair to a very specific location, but all water treatment plants are required to take samples at regular intervals.
      This doesn't account for any trace accumulated from the pipes between the water treatment plant and [where ever], but it does provide a reliable baseline that bullet manufacturers don't have.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:I am skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some ways, it parallels the evolution of DNA as evidence: it is far, far less reliable than it was first made out to be.

      Well, kind of. With fingerprints it's a similar problem. The issue is that both can be very, very reliably used to exclude someone as a match, but neither is really all that reliable in terms of inclusively matching. You can say 100% that subject A's hair does not match a sample, for example.

    3. Re:I am skeptical by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Obviously there are major problems with trying to link hair to a very specific location, but all water treatment plants are required to take samples at regular intervals.
      This doesn't account for any trace accumulated from the pipes between the water treatment plant and [where ever], but it does provide a reliable baseline that bullet manufacturers don't have.

      It doesn't do any such thing, because water samples are disposed of after analysis.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I am skeptical by raind · · Score: 1

      Wonder if the hair drug tests are reliable, just lost a job when they took some hair from me and found marijuana metabolites in it. Well that part was true anyway.

      --
      Get up!
    5. Re:I am skeptical by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I would be absolutely shocked if any water treatment facility was actually testing the isotope composition of their water on a regular basis.

      In fact, the only way I wouldn't be shocked, would be if the governor or someone else high in state politics or the water resource authority owned the testing company. In which case, all bets are off.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  13. Can't be right... by srjh · · Score: 2

    What? These results can't be right.

    I've never even been to Kilmarnock.

  14. Since this is slashdot by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can tell you where this gentleman hasn't been. The shower.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Since this is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      And he was the centerpiece at a bukakke session with 12 men.

  15. The 15-year logos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By gum, we need a meta-story that summarizes the fantastic 15-year anniversary logos that we've been enjoying this month when the celebrations come to an end.

    They've been great. Middle-earth? Braille? Mysterious crypto-patterns? Imagination! Experience! Effort!

    We true Slashdotters must all appreciate the effort put in; we should therefore demand a forum to discuss and congratulate the various artists.

    Who's with me? Vote this post up! I'm AC, so there's no karma-whoring here! Vote this post up to show: we want a story about the logos!

    1. Re:The 15-year logos! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      No. Who cares? A logo is just fluff, any nerd ignores them. The content is what matters.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:The 15-year logos! by Splab · · Score: 2

      Yes, because we all read the content of the articles posted and the full discussion before we make insightful comments...

    3. Re:The 15-year logos! by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      blog entry summarizing the designs shown so far

      The /. blog also promises a discussion of the logos when we've seen all of them.

    4. Re:The 15-year logos! by houghi · · Score: 1

      mod parent up

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  16. Oh crap! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I've just ate a bag of skittles that was made in the USA. But I've never been to the USA before.... That's nearly half way around the world.

    1. Re:Oh crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be careful. You are an Arizona fruit drink and a hoodie away from real troub... oh, wait, you don't live in Florida?
      Nevermind.

    2. Re:Oh crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've just ate a bag of skittles that was made in the USA. But I've never been to the USA before.... That's nearly half way around the world.

      Just some friendly advice, but generally speaking here in the US we eat the candy, not the bag.

  17. Umm.. by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So bring me some water from asia and when I drink it Ive been there? I believe the test, if accurate, proves where the water is from.. not necessarily here you have been... just sayin...

    1. Re:Umm.. by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

      sigh.. *where*..

  18. Another awesome fact by physlord · · Score: 1

    Ehleringer realized that what an animal eats and drinks does get recorded—in its tissues.

    Another astonishing cutting edge information—Earth is round!

  19. Trace Amounts of Chemicals by FairAndHateful · · Score: 3

    Holy crap, the holistic people have been on to something... Except they're not healing you with "trace elements", they're simply disguising where you've been so the bad germs can't find you!

  20. Pooop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they do this with poop too? ^_^

  21. Mod parent SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes, cause Louis Vuitton sells through outlet shops, online, and the /. crowd are SUCH huge fashionistas they're just dying to visit your crappy chinese knock-off shop and buy bags for girlfriends whoa re too stupid to recognize that no one can buy genuine LV for 29.99 with free shipping...

    fucking spammer *spits*

    captcha: staffed

    Oh captcha what are you trying to tell me?

  22. Pseudoscience at best, if applied properly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If used improperly, i.e. to determine where any individual has been, such a thing cannot be used to ascertain where you've been at any time prior to the eruption of any individual strand from its follicle. It MIGHT, if what has been written is true, determine where the food and/or water a person has consumed came from, or if anthropologists were using the technique to identify the migration patterns of ancient humans before the rise of international, then intercontinental trade.

    A quick census of my kitchen and fridge would imply that I have been to Ecuador, (where my bananas came from,) Mexico, (where my avocados and tomatoes came from,) Florida, (where my oranges and the oranges that were squeezed to form my orange juice came from,) Iowa (where the corn that goes into 50 different products in my diet came from,) Italy, (where the wheat that goes into my pasta was grown,) Japan, (where the rice that goes into many of the soups and snacks I enjoy was grown,) Columbia, (where the beans in my coffee were grown,) Greece, (where the olives that were squeezed to make my olive oil were grown,) France, (where most of the water I drink was bottled,) Spain, (where the grapes in my Sangria were grown,) to say nothing of China, where the lead in my toys comes from.

    A person analyzing my hair might well assume I've been to all of these places, as they might so many people, who like me, rarely leave their home-towns for any reason, but they'd be WRONG. This is phrenology all over again.

    But then, this has given me an opportunity to realize just how many different locales on this planet contribute to my diet. Globalism, hey?

    Imagine if the human race still exists a thousand years from now, and assuming the pace of forward technological progress and human knowledge and proliferation continues to follow the pattern it has. Our distant descendants could look around their kitchens and marvel at how they've hardly ever been off whatever interstellar habitat they live in, or how given what moon or planet they live on, how very many different worlds their consumables come to them from. Well, Blue Sun, hey?

    1. Re:Pseudoscience at best, if applied properly. by westlake · · Score: 1

      A quick census of my kitchen and fridge would imply that I have been to Ecuador, (where my bananas came from,) France, (where most of the water I drink was bottled,) Spain, (where the grapes in my Sangria were grown,)

      That census of your fridge can expose your income, cultural, ethnic and religious background, age, health and dietary restrictions or preferences of every sort.

      It costs from 240 to over 10,000 times more per gallon to purchase bottled water than it does to purchase a gallon of average tap water. In California average tap water costs about one tenth of a cent per gallon, while it bottled water costs about $0.90 per gallon -- a 560-fold difference. Expensive imported water sold in smaller bottles can cost several thousand times more than tap water: That $1.50 half-liter bottle of imported water may be costing you 10,000 times more per gallon than your tap water.

      Bottled Water: Pure Drink or Pure Hype? [2010]

      The geek tends to build his defenses around extravagant and implausible conceits and ignores the mundane.

      The jury won't much care where the killer purchased his custom tailored suits, rare and pricey vintage wines, liquors and Cuban cigars. They will care if the defendant shares the same expensive tastes.

  23. Ridiculous future for movie assassins by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    Gloves then shower cap?

  24. You're bald?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Well, we'll just see about that! Watson, the laser tweezers!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  25. Yet another reason by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...to not drink the local tap.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  26. New product! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Wel water from Fukushima on Ebay helps area recover!

  27. Patrick Stewart by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Most successful criminal mastermind EVER.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  28. Doesn't this pre-suppose... by destinyland · · Score: 1
    ...that you're showering?

    Or does the water get into your hair only after you drink actual water? (Because if so, you could really confuse the investigators by drinking nothing by bottled beverages.) Then they'd end up guessing that you came from wherever the bottling plant was located!

  29. I'm a world travel..12 oz at a time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to drink a variety of beers from around the world. All of them are bottled with their local water or treated water. Oh, snap!

  30. Point Break by Random+Data · · Score: 1

    The ex-Presidents are surfers!

  31. Huh? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    50 posts, and still no oblig.xkcd?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  32. Point Break by Switchback · · Score: 1

    This is new? Back in 1991, they used this technique to figure out what breaks the Ex-Presidents surf.

  33. I can tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell, with upwards of 50% confidence, what some "scientists" may have been smoking by reading every other line from every other para (Fibonacci sequence sampling is faster but less accurate) of their articles.

  34. Cheaper methods by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering the rate I'm losing my hair, all they have to do is follow the trail to figure out where I've been

    1. Re:Cheaper methods by Spectrumanalyzer · · Score: 1

      ^^ Someone mod this guy up, thats FUNNY!

  35. That bald guy that "fisted" his head into a vag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that bald guy that kind of looked like mr clean? He was the one that put his whole head in this girl's vagoo. Do you think he let his hair grow afterwards? If so, would these scientists be able to know where he's been?

  36. No problem! by aglider · · Score: 1

    I'm completely bald, you insensitive hairy clod!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  37. Don't let the TSA see this by wherrera · · Score: 1

    Next up in the news: TSA taking a lock of hair from random airline passengers...

    1. Re:Don't let the TSA see this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cue appearance of false flag "hair bomber" in 5,4,3,2....

  38. I wonder how much the water in the air factors in by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having lived in very dry places. (It frequently gets below 5% humidity in the summer outdoors) I know that with low humidity you can dry out fairly quickly. In Phoenix you are allowed to carry water into most sporting events because you need to replace the water that evaporates and everyone does it in the summer.

    When you are in someplace that is humid, you do not dry out as quickly because the water is being replaced by water in the air (yet I know there are other factors),

    It would be interesting to strictly control the isotope content in diet/drink for a month but in two different regions and then do a comparison.

  39. Is this why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supervillians are often bald?

  40. What about bottled water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool...

    I mainly drink Italian bottled water... According to their technique I spent all my time in Italy ?!?

  41. simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    develop a brand of water which contains water from various states in several different locations within each state. the same could be done with food and sold likewise as "Confusion".

  42. My hair tells me by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

    I've been down the drain a lot.

  43. Sherlock Holmes by Seumas · · Score: 1

    This is essentially what Sherlock Holmes did, right? Massive knowledge of soil, mud, water, tobacco, etc -- allowing him to determine where a person has been merely from a hint of dirt on the cuff of their trousers? Or pallywags or whatever it is they call pants across the pond.

  44. Re:This has been done for years - Yes, indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isotope Forensics, July 8, 2010 Tikalon Blog.

  45. Groan by coofercat · · Score: 1

    In the mane, the article is quite good, but it does rather brush over some of the finer details.

    I'm here all week ;-)

  46. She asked me whyyyyyy by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Why... I'm a hairy guy.

  47. I was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...at the movies with a friend, I swear!

  48. long hair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have long curly hair. The people who clean the gym showers know exactly where i've been

  49. Guard grabbed LBJ's pony tale.. by phrackwulf · · Score: 1

    "As they were leaving. The hair tested positive for selenium and titanium. The beaches are always being closed due to waste spills and stuff. If we check it out and find a match for the hair, then we'd know which break the Ex-Presidents surf!"

    "Angelo, are you buying this?"

    "I am Johnny Utah!"

    --
    What would Richard Feynman do, if he were here right now? He'd do some math and he'd follow through!
  50. CSI did it! by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    I don't know why they just don't show CSI episodes in forensics schools. Of course I am also surprised anybody is still caught for murder these days with all the crime investigation shows showing you what not to do.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  51. It won't work on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shave my body completely, totally bald. My pork and beans look like a catchers glove and I regularly stick glue rat traps to my bottom to ensure proper sanitation.

    Sorry, you'll need a better tracking method.

    1. Re:It won't work on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I regularly stick glue rat traps to my bottom

      Didja catch any rats?

  52. So wait... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I'm not supposed to commit crimes?

  53. Also skeptical by EdwinFreed · · Score: 1

    I RFTA, and I didn't see the citations to the peer-reviewed studies demonstrating the reliability of this technique. I also didn't see any cites to case law where these results have been found to be admissible in court.

    Of course it depends to some extent on how the results are being used. If they are being used for purposes of exclusion of suspects, or as a means of narrowing a search, reliability or admissibility may have yet to be tested. But sooner or later they will be. I just hope it happens before this gets widely accepted and someone gets hurt.

    On a personal note, I drink bottled water almost exclusively for health reasons (immune suppressed and bottled water has, on average, lower bacterial counts than tap). But I buy what's cheapest and available, which means I switch brands all the time. Assuming water does account for the majority of the isotopes these tests check, the stuff I'm drinking right now comes from two different sources, one 600+ miles north, the other 200+ miles northeast of here. Since this is in California, that's not exactly narrowing things down.

    1. Re:Also skeptical by ColoradoAuthor · · Score: 1

      Here's one reference in the literature about the technique (co-authored by the same guy featured in TFA):

      Ehleringer, J.R., Bowen, G.J., Chesson, L.A., West, A.G., Podlesak, D.W., Cerling, T.E. (2008). From the Cover: Hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in human hair are related to geography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(8), 2788-2793. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712228105 (geolocation based on oxygen isotopes in hair)

      Notice that isotope analysis indicates that a person was or was not in a set of regions at a given time, as in "possibly Texas or Florida." So it's better at narrowing down a list of possibilities than at pinpointing someone's travels. Or as the NOVA story says, it's a "a starting point" for an investigation, not a smoking gun to show off at a trial. (At work, I get to play with some of this stuff, blasting microscopic objects with laser beams and analyzing the atoms that fly off. How fun is that?)

    2. Re:Also skeptical by EdwinFreed · · Score: 1

      According to the abstract, their model "explains more than 85% of observed variation". So yes, it may be useful narrowing things down in an investigation, but this is a long way from being a tracking tool, let alone qualifying as an admissible forensic result. And judging from the cites It also looks like a lot of the interest in this has more to do with tracking movements of animals, not people, which is a lot more reasonable.

      FWIW, I used to do a lot of laser spectroscopy work, so this is not entirely familiar territory.

  54. Re:I wonder how much the water in the air factors by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

    In Phoenix you are allowed to carry water into most sporting events because you need to replace the water that evaporates and everyone does it in the summer.

    I'm amazed that it's even worth mentioning that you are allowed to carry water into sporting events. Isn't the right to carry water just assumed?

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.