In UK, Apple Must Run Ad Apologizing to Samsung
sfcrazy writes "Apple has lost is appeal in a UK court against Samsung's Galaxy Tab. The court of appeals has upheld its previous judgment that Samsung did not infringe on any Apple design. According to the order Apple will have to run an ads in leading UK newspapers as well its own website stating that Samsung did not infringes its products. To ensure that the ad is visible the court also ordered that the text of the ad must not be in a font size smaller than Ariel 14. Apple will have to run the ad on its site for a period of one month."
Never heard of that font...
The apology message will render like wingding symbols for most...
So, it would look like the Slashdot logo?
Now that Apple has been slapped down for lying, it might put an end to all the BS with these patent infringements.
-- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
I kind of read some sub-text there - that the two tablets are not similar because one is obviously from Samsung.
Hey now, I have it on good authority that over half of the /. editorial staff can now say their ABC's without even humming the song.
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
(I'm thinking about you, Lucy Koh)
Here comes a restraining order...
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
OK "Upon review it was found that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was not a copy of the iPad, it was a largely *inferior product which really only bared cursory visual similarities to the vastly *superior iPad. Apple only wanted to protect it's loyal customer from wasting time and money buying an *inferior product"
Where the words inferior and superior appear, they relate not to the quality of the products just to the profit generated by Apple.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen