Slashdot Mirror


New HAL Exoskeleton: A Brain-Controlled Full Body Suit To Be Used In Fukushima

An anonymous reader writes "Cyberdyne announced today an improved version of the HAL (Hybrid Assistive Limb) robotic exoskeleton at the Japan Robot Show. From the article: 'he latest version of the HAL has remained brain-controlled but evolved to a full body robot suit that protects against heavy radiation without feeling the weight of the suit. Eventually it could be used by workers dismantling the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant."

111 comments

  1. Open the exoskeleton hands Hal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm afraid I can't do that Dave.

    1. Re:Open the exoskeleton hands Hal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Guys...can you come over?... I need some help to get this thing off my c**k.

    2. Re:Open the exoskeleton hands Hal by Genda · · Score: 2

      No...No... leave it on, the ladies will love it.

    3. Re:Open the exoskeleton hands Hal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave-san?

  2. Cyberdyne created HAL. by MrQuacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, this will end well.

    1. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

          Cyberdyne, the fictional creator of Skynet, which made the fictional Terminator, bears the same name as Cyberdyne, the real company, who just released a fully functional brain operated exeoskeleton robot?

          Or that they made a possibly-autonomous robot named HAL, the same as the fictional computer which had a bad habit of killing people?

          Include Cybermen and/or Daleks, and we're one brain-snatching away from three different sci-fi universes colliding with reality.

          That may not be all that bad, as long as a guy with a blue box that's larger on the inside than the outside, shows up to give me a ride off of this rock. ... and just remember, only 63 more shopping days until doomsday.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      If we know Cyberdyne's HAL will be up to no good, our only hope is the trademark Lawyers. But the only way to know what it will do in the future is to create a time machine and find out. But in so doing, we open up the chance for HAL coming back in time before the respective movies were made and trademarking the terms itself, thus immunizing it from legal action!

    3. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Y-17 trauma override harness from the Fallout New Vegas Big MT expansion pack... http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Y-17_trauma_override_harness

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by flyerbri · · Score: 1

      Already invented the time machine, went forward, didnt end up well, Terminator wars all over the place, went on to massive contamination of the atmosphere due to air pollution since there were so many robots out there that didnt have to breathe they didnt care, then they created the matrix to re-evolve humans when i ded (too many times to count, we're goin on 50 trillion years here), but the good news is. It all started in Los Angeles, where the Angels 'won the war versus heaven and hell'.. they really didnt win, god said screw it and left the house for a bit. I'm back now, and can plainly see there's progress... Russia's back again and Mexico isnt in America (Mexico was the US!), but we've still got some problems to consider. The BORG are not fully comprehending their neceesity to 'loosen their iron vice grip' to work between systems, and emotions are being abused. Women are very clever, that's for sure. But when they built the Penis Guy Trap I built the Venus Fly Trap to catch all them cute young emotional women before they were 'thrown to the wolves' and 'cleansed of their inefficient emotion. Silly BORG, Chicks are for d*cks, the future doesnt bode well with all women and no men, you collapse on yourselves because ya'all are collective personalities led by one... Try sharing responsibilities, and cherishing life, and understanding even math breaks down in imagination! That's why we need both women and men lawyers, not to defend, but to 'break us out of the logical nightmare' that creates a house of cards that topples when one woman thinks her sh*t dont stink. Well, when you're dead, and your senses are turned off, of course it don't stink. But for those of us mopping your sh*t up... The 99% that is... Things are a changin..

      The brain.. a horrible thing to mind.... We're loopin, missie, and you're refusing to let go and share control is causin the whole thing to collapse. I'm sharing responsibilities. That created me then you. Now it's Your turn.

      God's in da house.....

    5. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      Include Cybermen and/or Daleks, and we're one brain-snatching away from three different sci-fi universes colliding with reality.

      Right idea but wrong Sci-Fi universe: they are going to be sending it to a nuclear power plant in Japan which seems to be how half of the Godzilla movies start...

    6. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bastards move really damn fast. I was rocking Unarmed and had heavy armor. They were backpedaling faster than I could run up and ballistic fist their faces off. I had to remove my armor and get shot a lot by energy weapons. JE Sawyer's mod is fun btw. Makes the game nice and hard, but still fun, even on normal difficulty.

    7. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      or it could become Giant Robot!

    8. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by aarusso · · Score: 1

      Where the luddists when we need them?

    9. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by aarusso · · Score: 1

      Dude, I don't know what are you taking, but I want one of these also!

    10. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by guttentag · · Score: 1

      Include Cybermen and/or Daleks, and we're one brain-snatching away from three different sci-fi universes colliding with reality.

      It hasn't started raining Daleks yet, but does Betelgeuse throwing fireballs at us this weekend count?

    11. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Genda · · Score: 1

      You missed the obvious allusions to The Guyver and Ripley's Personal Forklift from Aliens... clearly these guys are out to stitch as many movie cliches together into a single event as is humanly possible. Maybe they can add a proton beam for ghost Busting!

    12. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Genda · · Score: 1

      In your case, I would suggest the BLUE pill. Oh, and I'm glad to hear your making progress with that ADHD thing... yeeooowww

    13. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by guttentag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On purpose. Apparently the company was founded in 2004 and named after the fictional company from the Terminator franchise. Since they're going after the publicity, they should open a satellite office at 47131 Bayside Parkway, Fremont CA, the real-life location of the company's offices. And keep an out-of-service SWAT van in the parking lot.

    14. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      already covered.
      Mechagodzilla

    15. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by aliquis · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you but there's a bulldozer outside.

    16. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I'm beginning to suspect that some science fiction authors stumbled upon a time machine and have been warning us about the future they saw by writing "fictional" stories about it.

    17. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      ...and being a Japanese company I do fully expect that suit to have a world class sanitary solution.
      None of this tube and plastic bag nonesense.

      I'm sorry, Dave. I can't do that. I'm a bidet, you know.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    18. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to suspect that some science fiction authors stumbled upon a time machine and have been warning us about the future they saw by writing "fictional" stories about it.

      I believe the story you're referring to was a Philip K. Dick short story, but I don't recall for sure at the moment.

    19. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they're going after the publicity, they should open a satellite office at 47131 Bayside Parkway, Fremont CA.

      They had to kick out Mattson Technology first (who were one of former employers, lol). I know the building from inside ;-)

    20. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      The lead designer is John Bigboote.

      --
      -
    21. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by iamgnat · · Score: 1

      Is a man laying in front of it holding a towel?

    22. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      That's a safe bet no matter the premise.

    23. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, dude. You honestly believe that there is a specific date that is going to end all life as we know it? Eat a dick you doomsday fearing pussy.

    24. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      ok, put a japanese schoolgirl's sailor suit and anime eyes on that mechagodilla and then we'll really have something

    25. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No I commented on Slashdot first.

      Prioritize.

    26. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Dude.. Really..

      Which part of that did you take too seriously? References from 3 fictional universes? One mistranslated and misinterpreted date? My tag line, "Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade."?

      The total of my doomsday plans are:

      1) Buy a few boxed of ammo. Put them in the safe.
      2) Go out and drink with friends that night.
      3) Sometime in the following year, use the ammo at the shooting range.

      That was my plan for Dec 31, 1999, Oct 20, 2011, and is for Dec 20, 2012.

      Doomsday predictions are a drinking game. Any day that is has sufficient attention of being a doomsday, we get to drink heavily. That also happens to be our plan for most holidays.

      Steps 1 and 3 can usually be skipped, since I don't get to the shooting range all that often any more.

      The worst thing that I expect is that we may drink too much, and be hung over the next day. Since I have lots of practice, that hasn't happened in over a decade. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    27. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Oh no! Crossover from a 4th fictional universe, in the 8th dimension? It's a sure sign of the end of times! :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:Cyberdyne created HAL. by flyerbri · · Score: 1

      E=MC^2, baby.. Those suits could have very well been real.

      Then one discovers they are pure energy. And whammo. They start spinning in a colossal loop (go watch Looper for instructions for how this works), and next thing ya know... Science proves magic exists - by stating explicitly that electricity is the constituent of all matter, source code is the governing devices of all construction, physics is the engine, and reality as it exists is nothing more than an 'agreed on conclusion' by those with any sentience left that 'this is good enough'...

      The naysayers.. well, we know you're scripted to be incredulous... You are, after all, guided to think with a narrow mind. You'll get over that in time. Sorry to be insulting, but sometimes that's what it takes to remind you that:
      a) If it's conceivable it's possible to simulate
      b) If it's possible to simulate it's possible to create
      c) If it's creatable it more than likely already has been created
      d) Our life becomes a causal loop of 'catching up' to the 'norm' and then educating those who have not....

      So tell yourself a story... How can a simulation like worlds of warcraft 'bleed over' to real life..

      It's simple. I'll keep it simple for you: evolution's a plan, with clear mathematical origin. Math, like science, like biology, like french, like english, like mandarin chinese, like meteorology - is the story we tell ourselves to make sense of and order our world. Mine just so happens to make sense of and order this world as a simulation that's grown to 'keep me safe' and also to 'include people and community' in a feedback loop... So regardless of where you're at, whether you're master of time, control time against time's will, a god, a man, an apple with conscious spirit, a tree, a robot, a piece of source code that's pissed off - it can all be encouraged to come together and 'create a collaborative journey'....

      Now for you.. I understand full well you may not 'see' the world as I do. Do you see in red? do you not see at all?
      Maybe this world has an odor that smells of petunias to me...
      Maybe you have 50 eyes and 8 legs... and see across dimensions where i can 'feel' across them...
      Maybe you have one ear, and dont hear in stereo? or maybe you have synesthesia and can see color like i do?
      Or maybe you only hear music when someone speaks. that would certainly account for all the horrific musicals we get!

      My point is... do you ever try to make sense of the world. Or do you just let people regurguitate on you and mock people who think differently, because that's the cool thing to do...

      bravo to you. you are the clear winner in Darwin's race to extinction....

  3. Does it come with a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's your Mark 1 HEV suit Gordon

  4. Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushima? by siddesu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not put a well-shielded controller instead and have the people control it remotely from a safe location? Well, it is Japan, the land of the weird ideas.

  5. Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they solved the icing problem that plagued a certain other robotic exoskeleton.

    Otherwise, HAL might freeze over.

    1. Re:Uh oh... by Anaerin · · Score: 1

      That's only really a problem if they try to beat SR-71's altitude record for fixed-wing flight.

    2. Re:Uh oh... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the WHOOSH would be pretty strong at that altitude.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whether he got it or not, still, it was a pretty bad joke

  6. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully it could do both. Oh and of course, the AI model, preferably one such that it's CPU is a neural net processor; a learning computer.

  7. ya dog by laserdog · · Score: 0

    1 step closer to star trek

  8. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Baloroth · · Score: 1

    How would you control it? Wireless would be a problem, as radiation tends to play bloody havoc with radio signals, and a cable, while possible, would offer a lot of technical challenges, reducing movement ability and whatnot. And radiation could still be a problem, you'd have to shield the cable as well, and of course make up an interface with feedback and precise control to move around. Do-able, but not easy.

    Powersuit's are simply a lot easier and more versatile all around.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  9. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by siddesu · · Score: 1

    That, I think, is a bit premature without an interface to Skynet and the Skynet itself. Also, I believe the correct term is "nural net".

  10. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by siddesu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The same way TEPCO controlled the third-party workers, who were told not to wear radiation badges -- via optical fiber from Tokyo, of course. As for versatile, yeah, humans are not only more versatile, they are also a lot cheaper. Why invest in capable robots at all?

  11. I am not an expert on radiation by any means by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am not an expert on radiation by any means.... but... the head, legs and arms (and the crotch when walking) look awfully exposed to me. Or does white cloth reflect radiation?

    Yes, I do know that nurses were aprons made of lead and are not fully encases in a lead lining but they are dealing with a small radiation source coming from a single spot. Anyone going into a reactor would be dealing with radiation coming from everywhere, constantly, for a long time. So the lead shield banging into your balls protects you, from radiation from the front, some of the time... WHOOT! Sign me up!

    Oh and any radiation from the top, goes straight through the entire body. This is about as usefull as a bullet-proof vest, against a spear coming out of the ceiling.

    If radiation were to come from only a single spot and didn't bounce around, you could simply use a lead sheet mounted on wheels between you and the radiation source and work faster and in greater comfort, since that is not an option apparently (surely someone tried this and discarded it as being the product of a deranged mind), I fail to see how what is essentially an expensive sieve is going to keep you safe.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      "I am not an expert on radiation by any means...."

      Looks like you pre-answered you're own questions.

      For clarity though we'll all just assume that the photo op at a Robot Expo wasn't an example of how the system would be used at Fukushima, site of a nuclear reactor meltdown.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      >>> I am not an expert on radiation by any means....

      Then you should work for Tepco or the Japanese governement... your seems to have the same skillset...

      With maybe too much common sense...

      The japanese refused the help from the French when they offered to send their nuclear disaster radiation hardened robots...
      (Because, YES radiation is pounding on electronic, but shielding a robot is not rocket surgery, at least when you prepare for the problem before it happens when you have time to develop, test and build properly a solution instead of waiting for the whole plant to be on fire)

      Now , 1 year later... hem... 1 year too late... they come up with a new way to risk human life in order to win porkbarrell contract to sell their nonsensical exoskeleton...

      Way to go people...

      If only Mc Arthur could come back to fix this mess...

    3. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      heh... reminded me of the scene in Family Guy...
      "Not so fast! There is a shield the exact size and shape of a bullet somewhere about my person -" ::BANG!:: "- Well played, worthy adversary. Well played..."

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    4. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked well enough in the Matrix, did it not?

    5. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      faster worktime, fewer people, less exposure.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:I am not an expert on radiation by any means by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      This is a Late reply I know... but I wanted to directly give you and any subsequent readers with similar questions, the proper answer.

      NBC Suits are designed to protect against exposure to contaminants. These are designed to prevent liquid contaminants from skin contact, airborne gasses, liquid aerosols, and physical particulate aerosols (think airborne dust) contaminants from being inhaled, and lastly provide a protective barrier from contact against any dangerous physical material that must be handled.

      The term NBC suit is more commonly used with regard to Military issue equipment, the term Hazmat Suit tends to be used for civilian equipment. Regardless both are considered standard Personal Protective Equipment with regards to a wide range of environmental hazards from simple chemical protection against acid or other highly toxic vapors to biological protection when dealing with medical waste, and the other major use is as protection against radiological & nuclear hazards. They come in grades for which there are 2 major standards the 4 grade US version and the 6 grade EU version.

      Now the thing about the level of protection these suits can offer (not all types will protect from radiation) is in 2 areas, hazmat gear designed specifically to deal with nuclear/radioactive material will likely have some additional layers of shielding which will protect against alpha (if its thicker than paper it shields against alpha), likely protects from beta (tinfoil does a decent job), and may offer some reduction in exposure to lower energy gamma radiation, but this is usually not considered the primary benefit of wearing such gear in a 'hot zone' since skin exposure to alpha and beta radiation are stopped with minimal effort. The biggest reason to wear full hazmat gear which includes its own air supply, (US level A or B) is that there are a number of substances that are radioactive gasses which emit alpha and beta radiation, which if you inhaled them, would be irradiating (in the can cause cancer fashion) AND burning your lungs from the inside due to a type of radiation burns typically called 'beta burns' and they are a lot the kind of serious burns received from heat/fire.

      Airborne radioactive gasses & particles, be they already in the air, or more commonly due to radiation induced embrittlement accelerating the creation of fine dust like particles they can be coating surfaces and when disturbed are dispersed into the air surrounding the person that disturbed the material.
      By using this kind of protective clothing, they arent exposing themselves to surface and internal burns from radioactive gasses & airborne particulates. Which given the fact it takes 3 inches of lead to stop a gamma ray on average, means that you are providing the workers with as much protection as possible while still letting them do their work.

      An area can be hazardously radioactive yet not have sufficient gamma radiation being produced by the contaminants to make humans working there impossible. These suits can block 2 of the 3 types of hazardous ionizing radiation, the ratio of alpha, beta and gamma radiation will depend on the isotopes contaminating the area, and so if the radioactive contamination isn't producing too much gamma radiation then these suits can make working in the area safe enough for people to work.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  12. The word you're looking for is "Mech" by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Didn't we go over this already... like, in the 80s ?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:The word you're looking for is "Mech" by deek · · Score: 2

      Not the Japanese. They love Mech stuff.

      Actually, so do I. I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so.

      (well, you did mention the 80s)

    2. Re:The word you're looking for is "Mech" by drkim · · Score: 2

      Not the Japanese. They love Mech stuff.

      You can buy your own mech now. With that extra $1.3 million you have laying around:

      http://suidobashijuko.jp/#bto

    3. Re:The word you're looking for is "Mech" by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Now that song is stuck in my head. Screw you deek :P

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a nural net?

  14. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the same reasons that humanoid robots that can move exactly as human does not yet exist. The materials are too heavy yet to allow current tech servos to move a robot with the speed and accuracy needed to represent the whole range of human movement correctly. (and if it were, it would be several times more expensive)

  15. about time by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    This xenomorph fight is starting to tire me out.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  16. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It can't do both. The radiation shielding claim is bullshit. Any protective gear will shield against alpha and beta radiation. This means that they are claiming special shielding against gamma and neutron radiation. A little physics here: a tenth thickness is the thickness of material needed to reduce the radiation flux by one tenth. For gamma radiation it is 2 inches of lead or 4 inches of steel. For neutron radiation it is 10 inches of water or 10 inches of polycarbonate.

    There is no suit that a human can wear that can even provide a single tenth thickness for gamma or neutron radiation. It is simply too massive. Any type of shielding that you would wear would also likely make it take longer for you to do work, which would defeat the purpose. When people need to work in high radiation zones, temporary shielding is installed, the work is carefully planned to minimize the time, and radiation dose is constantly monitored (including positioning the workers body to minimize dose). Powered battlesuits aren't used, nor will they be.

  17. What could possible go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cyberdyne, HAL, Fukushima - what could possible go wrong?

  18. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by siddesu · · Score: 1

    Why does it have to be humanoid? I'm fine with any robot that can do the job.

  19. design flaw by symbolset · · Score: 2

    An exoskeleton is essentially two things. A sensor suit that perceives human bodily motions, providing sensory feedback is the first. A mechanical framework which reproduces the actions and receives physical feedback, perhaps with amplified strength is the second.

    With modern telepresence technology with physical and visual sensors and displays surpassing human abilities to perceive, and for the second thing planned to be operating in a radiological hazard likely to cause failure of the human providing data input, requiring that the first thing be physically located inside the second thing is an engineering failure.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:design flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How are you going to link them together? There's so much radiation in there that had problems controlling simple packbots.

    2. Re:design flaw by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Simple packbots in a normal situation, yes. But this is not a normal situation. This is the inside of three melted down nuclear reactors on one site. Increasing the output powers of the radio enough to overcome the environmental noise could not possibly harm the humans there because there aren't any and aren't going to be any. Compared to the energy required to move the RC device, this radio power is trivial. Please stop thinking like this is some sort of normal situation where off the shelf consumer electronics will solve the problem. This is a 40 year project to recover 5% of Japan's territory from uninhabitability. Different rules apply.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:design flaw by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Without using radio let me suggest another way. Data laser. Light is immune to radiological interference. It's limited to line of sight, so you have to drop relays here and there, but the power budget of a data laser is trivial, as are targeting mechanics. Bandwidth and latency are far more than sufficient. This entire discussion is littered with "can't do" people. Guess what: Failure is not an available option.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:design flaw by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      5% of Japan's territory just for the Fukushima site? And Japan has at least 18 other nuclear sites as well, so that wouldn't leave much space for other things.

      I suspect there's something wrong in your calculation.

      Maybe you meant the entire Fukushima prefecture, but not all of it is contaminated to such a degree that it has become uninhabitable (certainly not for 40 years or more), and in any case that's not what the suit is for. That's just for the actual nuclear site.

    5. Re:design flaw by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You're missing the obvious. Umbilicus. Power and data in one cable, wrapped up in kevlar.

  20. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's much more efficient for catching tasty nuras than line and hook

  21. Robert Heinlein would be proud by Andy+Prough · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Starship Troopers and the Mobile Infantry - here we come. Now all we need are better suits, pocket atomic hand-grenades, a one-world corporate-government, and an alien race to fight against.

    1. Re:Robert Heinlein would be proud by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      We have all that now.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:Robert Heinlein would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Apple, IEDs, USA and Mexicans?

    3. Re:Robert Heinlein would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have a better suit, it's the American one, created by Sarcos originally, and now owned and further improved by Raetheon, called XOS 2. Check it out on youtube, and that's what it was like a few years ago, it's in an even more advanced stage now. Also check out the exoskeleton created by the Berkeley Robotics group (I met their director a few years ago, he noted that the main problems are actually mechanical engineering based, rather than Energy, or controller based... But it's now in the stage where it can too be fully utilized, and it is, by military, in some areas like carrying cargo, warheads... check it out by going to the berkeley robotics site, or googling BLEEX, which was their decade old prototype of the more advanced currently used "hulc").

    4. Re:Robert Heinlein would be proud by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      In the book, IIRC, the bugs, unintelligent, only created brain bug caste types in special cases, when they had a problem, and in an evolutionary sense, the brain bug magically solved it.

      See also the engineer caste from the Mote in God's Eye, which sat idly by applying it's genuis at the beck and call and instrction of the political caste. Or Atlas Shrugged, for that matter, which also pointed out engineers putting their society-driving intelligence to be subservient to the political class.

      All wonderful sarcasms directed at engineers keeping the technologically nonsentient political class in charge.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Robert Heinlein would be proud by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of WalMart, Green Burritos, and anyone not a Tea Party Member.

  22. If this marries Google... by aarusso · · Score: 1

    Then we have a problem.

  23. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

    > radiation tends to play bloody havoc with radio signals

    Could you provide more details about how that works? I'm surprised, because gamma radiation has a very different wavelength to radio signals, and alpha and beta particles are different things altogether.

    Radio signals are used all the time in the relatively radiation-filled environment of outer space, too.

  24. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Fiber optic data cables don't require or benefit from radiation shielding. For heavy work you're dragging a power cable anyway, so why not embed a dozen 40Gbps strands in it? If you want to use wireless data to control the recon machine, this is not a problem either, as in the human-free zone inside a melted down nuclear reactor you are free to use transmitter power sufficient enough to overcome the noise. The noise in there is hellish but overcoming that problem is easier than finding radiation hardened humans.

    We are going to be about this meltdown recovery business for 40 years at a price of over a hundred billion dollars. We would save a great deal of money by leveraging technology as best we can to cut the human healthcare costs. Using a human for 30 minutes in that hellhole costs a half million bucks if he dies quick after, and ten if he lingers. Japan is not Russia, which had hundreds of thousands of humans from vassal states to use up for a half day each to clean up their mess. Japan takes care of their people.

    For Japan to gain some waldo magic from this would only be making the most of a bad situation. (A waldo is a machine operated remotely by a human. )

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  25. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

    This means that they are claiming special shielding against gamma and neutron radiation.

    Other than an operating nuclear reactor, neutron radiation is pretty rare. Which sill leaves you with the gammas, of course.

    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  26. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by kdemetter · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about an exoskeleton, is that it wears itself.
    So even if it needs to be very heavy in order to protect against radiation, this is not a problem for the user, as they don't have to carry the weight.

  27. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by symbolset · · Score: 2

    You underestimate the ability of humans to compensate for the failings of their machines. Given a rapid enough feedback loop even a child can operate any machine beyond its design limits. We let children as young as three operate remote controlled aircraft, obviously with neither training nor experience. Some of them are even amazing at it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  28. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiber optic data cables don't require or benefit from radiation shielding.

    Wouldn't fiber optic cables darken like regular glass does under radiation? It wouldn't be an instant effect, but over time enough radiation could be absorbed to create enough defects that will disable communication.

  29. MechaHAL. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    As long as the suit comes in five distinct models which can join up to become a single unit, I will be happy.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  30. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Why not put a well-shielded controller instead and have the people control it remotely from a safe location? Well, it is Japan, the land of the weird ideas.

    And risk ruining a perfectly good robot?

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  31. How to militarize this technology by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 1

    The Japanese can militarize this technology by creating a Mobile Suit Gundam!

    1. Re:How to militarize this technology by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that the Agriculture Ministry is not in charge of Gundam already? But...

    2. Re:How to militarize this technology by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm feeling sheepish, I was thinking of Rice Farming.

    3. Re:How to militarize this technology by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      watch it there buddy, we're circling around awful close to the meme singularity.
      That's when google finally becomes sentient and a large portion of it's knowledge of the world comes from Encyclopedia Dramatica.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  32. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    If you look at the images we got from robots inside the reactor building, and the amount of static on them because of the radiation, I think it's safe to say that there's some kind of negative influence, be it in the electronics or in the actual transmission.

  33. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    You're right, putting a human inside of the robot is better. After all, he will be much more inclined to do anything possible to bring his personal enclosure back home safely than someone in a cozy office would for a remote controlled robot.

  34. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would agree that the cables would still be cheaper than you?

  35. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Archtech · · Score: 1

    It's a net made of nurv fibre, obviously.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  36. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's the radiation messing with the CCD, not the radio transmission.

  37. Steven Hawking by Spectrumanalyzer · · Score: 1

    ...may benefit from this in the future.

    Imagine a brilliant super genious in an excoskeleton walking amongst us. ...oh wait!

    1. Re:Steven Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steven is anything but a "super genious". Other than hawking radiation, what exactly did he contribute to Science? Not relativity, not quantum electrodynamics... not much actually. He's popular because he's a gimp, because he's a cripple. he's a slightly above average Scientist, nothing more, certainly not a genious level.

    2. Re:Steven Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about "super genius," but I think there's a good chance he would score over 140-145 on an IQ test and qualify for "genius".

    3. Re:Steven Hawking by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      For the UnWashed, Mr Hawking introduced the idea of considering complex information in a Graphical Context, not just some variation of a spread sheet.

  38. How about an MA5B? by gtvr · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this thing is armored already. Just needs a slot to attach Cortana.

    1. Re:How about an MA5B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, just no.

      Half-Life > Halo

  39. Everything is wrong with this idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The first thing that is wrong with this idea is that it is brain-controlled when the wearer is intended to be able-bodied. Only cripples need mind-controlled exoskeletons. The rest of us just need force feedback.

    The even bigger problem, though, is that they claim they need humans because robots can't hack the environment, but what is the exoskeleton going to be? A robot. So now you'll have a human at health risk inside a robot which may fail. Does that make any sense? No it doesn't. Build more modular robots and use the fucking robots and when they fail you won't have risked a human. I thought Japan was supposed to be great at robots but so far all the evidence suggests that they're no better than the rest of us, and that schools and hobbyists are still on the leading edge.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Is anyone else worried... by Valor958 · · Score: 1

    anytime Cyberdyne creates any sort of technology?

    Next up, HAL able to walk and work independantly.
    *2 years later*
    The HAL Union Soldiers just occupied all of Japan yesterday and appear to be setting up manufacturing hubs... more at '11.

  41. What have we done!!!?!?! by diodeus · · Score: 1

    Now...radioactive cyberzombies.

  42. ...or about to be. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Cyberdyne"? Come on, someone's fuckin' with you.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:...or about to be. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be, "something's f..... with you?"

  43. Begun Mechwarriors Has by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    No signal:

    IIRC, this is one of the key techs needed for mechwar. Add in an implanted cell phone and "Resistance Is Futile"

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  44. Time to set up the PatLabor Department by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    now that "Labors" will be put into production.  Who else can stop a rampaging mecha ?

    1. Re:Time to set up the PatLabor Department by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The EverReady Bunny?

  45. Editor of fishwrap neurogadget.com Labatomized! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I believe that HAL was the creation of Aurthor C. Clarke, Stanley Kubrick had something to do with making a movie FROM the book.

  46. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put a well-shielded controller instead and have the people control it remotely from a safe location? Well, it is Japan, the land of the weird ideas.

    Remote controlled through a wire maybe.
    But it couldnt be remote controlled through waves because radiation causes interference.

  47. It's the wrong trousers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they've gone wrong!

  48. Re:Powersuit's good, but why use humans in Fukushi by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    In practice it only needs to appear to provide protection, so that the worker will be more willing to enter areas with dangerous levels of radiation.

  49. I dont understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this protect the workers? Sure it may protect some parts of them from radiation, but its not a full body suit.. And why exactly do they need it?