Slashdot Mirror


TSA Moving X-ray Body Scanners To Smaller Airports

OverTheGeicoE writes "If you're concerned about possible health effects from TSA's X-ray body scanners, you might be pleased to learn that TSA is making changes. TSA is removing X-ray body scanners from major airports including Los Angeles International, Boston's Logan, Chicago's O'Hare, and New York City's JFK. Then again, these changes might not please you at all, because they are not mothballing the offending devices. No, they are instead moving them to smaller airports like the one in Mesa, AZ. Is this progress, or is TSA just moving potentially dangerous scanners from 'Blue' areas to 'Red' ones right before a presidential election?"

18 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Perhaps rednecks by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are vastly underrepresented in the mutant superhero business and the government has finally decided to do something about it.

  2. And... by Revotron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...politics has what to do with this, now? Just felt like throwing out blind accusations that the TSA is trying to give Republicans cancer?

    1. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the implication is that Obama is moving the scanners to red states in an effort to increase his votes in those states and (possibly) flip one of them to blue. You would do this by impressing red voters with the "security technology" of the TSA and appearing to address the supposed security concerns of red voters. That's just my interpretation of the comment, I'm not saying I agree.

      As far as I know, you'd have to be pretty delusional to think that anyone will be impressed with the scanners... but I guess it's possible.

      I suspect the real reason is that TSA wishes to roll out something newer and more expensive to the country's major airports and needs to create space and need for them (by eliminating the older body scanners).

    2. Re:And... by Applekid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Possible implication: Only "blue" people are actually concerned about X-ray radiation harm, so they're moving the X-ray devices to areas less likely to care.

      Or, rather, areas less likely to contain people with a voice. There's a reason why so many unethical human experiments were conducted in the South.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  3. I'm confused... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last sentence suggests that I should come up with a frothing political conspiracy theory; but I don't know which one I'm supposed to latch on to...

    Are the jackbooted Obamunist gestapo making a last-ditch move to irradiate freedom loving Real Americans in order to ensure their demographic victory even in the event of electoral defeat? Or are the jackbooted Rethuglicans of the police state amping up the fear machine in order to increase the effectiveness of traditional 'democrats are weak on terror, especially ones that are secretly kenyan muslims' messages?

    Help me out here, Slashdot!

    1. Re:I'm confused... by killmenow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After Obama wins the election, the most likely terrorist threat will come from these areas. They're just thinking...Forward.

    2. Re:I'm confused... by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, what's happening is that the Bavarian Illuminati are using their control of Barack Obama, the NRA, the Ice-Capades, Mel Gibson, and the TSA to seize control of the Moral Majority from the opposing Adepts of Hermes.

      Of course, everything I needed to learn about politics, I gleaned from playing Illuminati: New World Order.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  4. Is this the latest Fox and Friends conspiracy? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obamanation is moving TSA scanners to affect the election? Haven't seen the morning show recently to get my monthly dose of crazy.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  5. I think... by Antipater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that OverTheGeicoE's tinfoil hat reflected a few too many x-rays into his brain.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  6. Re:What? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is how to know Obama is doing a pretty good job: Almost all major accusations against him are factually wrong, or nonsense.

    Bullshit. Obama has failed to faithfully enforce the laws of the United States by failing to prosecute anyone for the well documented torture under the Bush administration, or any of the well documented fraud that lead to the 2008 financial crisis. He continues to engage in warrantless wiretapping. He signed the unconstitutional NDAA. He has prosecuted government whistleblowers under the espionage act at a rate that exceeds all previous administrations combined.

    No, Obama is not doing a pretty good job, unless you thought Bush was doing a pretty good job. In that case, Obama is doing a fantastic job by embracing and extending virtually all of Bush's abuses of power.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Re:Hits and my prediction by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Modern election politics has shown that "crazy" sells.

    FTFY.

    While FOX is well known for their... interesting and creative interpretations, they by no means have monopoly on irrational, bullshit fluff pieces.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  8. Makes perfect sense! by frobbie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This makes perfect sense. These machines are slower than the new one, so they are moving them to smaller airports where there are less people, and shorter lines for security.

  9. Re:What? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To the best of my recollection there has been no US president in history, regardless of affiliation, that has prosecuted past administrations for their actions. It's been traditionally viewed as a political landmine both with the citizenry and fellow politicians alike.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  10. Risk Mitigation by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds to me to be a case of risk mitigation. Take the more dangerous (medically and/or politically) devices out of heavily traveled airports and place them in less traveled ones. In so doing they are not throwing away the capital investment and at the same time reducing exposure to the general population.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  11. Who's the criminal by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it interesting that the TSA has caught more thieves (within their own ranks) than terrorists.

    It seems like you hear about "airport personnel" (i.e. TSA employees) who would use their searches to locate and remove valuables from passenger luggage.

    However, I have yet to hear about a single terrorist caught by the TSA.

    It looks to me like the TSA is committing more criminal activity than they are preventing.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  12. I always opt out by Thagg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yesterday, for example, I opted out of the microwave scanner at Burbank airport. I do this every time I encounter a machine like this, and have the time to still make my flight. I don't do it because I feel they are unsafe (this particular machine is a ambient-microwave imager, it emits no radiation whatsoever) but as a (albiet incredibly weak) political statement -- I feel that if nobody opted out, soon enough nobody would be able to.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  13. Re:What? by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Informative

    The interesting thing about all that is that this argument has not once come up in the presidential debates. Why? Because it's safe to say that Mitt Romney and the Republican political establishment agrees wholeheartedly with all of those decisions.

    And people wonder why I'm voting for a minor party this year in what everyone thinks is a critical swing state.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  14. Re:What? by gorzek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I despised Bush. Obama is smarter but carries on most of the same policies, especially when it comes to foreign policy and economic intervention. About the only place where he really differs is on social issues and the role of government aid programs.

    All this has done is make his opposition even more insane. So, now I get to choose between a guy who is mostly like Bush and a guy who seems to have no beliefs of his own, but is beholden to a base made up of lunatics. Awesome choice there.

    I voted for Obama, again, because I could not in good conscience vote to further empower the deranged hysterics of the Republican Party.