Slashdot Mirror


US Patent Office Invalidates Apple's "Rubber Banding" Patent

bhagwad writes "The patent that was the cause of so much grief to Samsung in the recently concluded trial with Apple has been tentatively invalidated by the USPTO. The challenge was filed anonymously, but it obviously could have been filed by any smartphone manufacturer. Will this have an effect on further proceedings in the case or perhaps more importantly on the inevitable appeal?"

3 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Uncited Theft from Academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look in HCI this stuff has been done since forever. Academics got really interested in touch technologies in the early 2000s. They've been used spring decay to make "nicer" and more natural interfaces ever since.

    Many patents out there are IP theft. They are stealing from public institutions and patenting technology that has been developed in academia.

  2. Re:Hate it by SuperMooCow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think what he's saying is that if there was a rubber band effect, it would confirm that the device accepted his scrolling command but also show him that it's not supposed to scroll.

  3. It at first you are rejected...try again. by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chances are that it was rejected the first time. And the second time. And the third time...

    You see, when Apple doesn't get a patent approved, they just change a few words and keep trying. Take for example the '604 patent. It was rejected twice in 2007, three times in 2008, once in 2009, twice in 2010 and once in 2011. (source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/technology/patent-wars-among-tech-giants-can-stifle-competition.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all )

    Finally it got approved (tenth time is the charm!).

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: