Slashdot Mirror


Inside Social Media's Fake Fan Industry

jfruh writes "It's an open secret that many high-profile users of social media networks pay to pad their fan counts. But what you do you get for your money? One blogger decided to shell out some cash to find out. Instead of the real human fans he was promised, he found himself followed by a motley collection of obvious fakes created by non-English speakers and accounts that seem to mainly exist to spam porn links."

10 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. The real problem... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Big deal, there's fake people on the internet.

    The actual problem here is the value that is placed on having a high number of followers, likes or whatever. Back in the MySpace days this was simply a bunch of teenagers who wanted to claim some vague kudos through having more "friends" than others, but these days the marketing industry has latched on to it and people/companies are placing a real financial value on it. This is a problem - it's a bubble in the making, and when it pops there are going to be some pretty bitter recriminations and a lot of money lost.

    So if you want to collect lots of followers, fine, it's up to you. But if you believe there's any financial value in it then I've got some tulips you may be interested in purchasing as an investment...

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    1. Re:The real problem... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there was a bit more involved there.

      In the early MySpace/gaming days, many of the social games gave you big advantages for having more friends than your opponents. Even now, games like Farmville are geared towards having a huge amount of friends to 'gift' you digital trinkets and perform menial digital tasks.

      Also, the 'fake friends' and 'fake followers' used to be used for fake click-throughs, to up the amount of money ad advertiser would pay you for hosting an ad banner.

      Nowadays, you get what you pay for. TFA's author likely paid on the low-end. If he wanted what folks like Microsoft get (see any CNET article comment section concerning Microsoft if you want examples), you gotta be prepared to open the checkbook...

      When you stack the ducats high, you get top-end fake comments/reviews/whatever.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:The real problem... by gman003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So marketers are about as intelligent as a Myspace-using teenager.

      Sounds about right.

  2. Let me be the first to say by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    That I am shocked, yes, shocked at this despicable behavior. Next your going to tell me that it doesn't make any difference if I vote for Obama, Romney or the tooth fairy.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vote for the tooth fairy! $1 per tooth knocked out! Or follow the suggestion in my sig.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 4, Funny

      "A vote for anyone but the tooth fairy and you're just throwing it away"

      "I will donate $5 million to charity if Ms. Fairy can prove she's a dentist"

      "This election is not about teeth, but the people whose mouths use them!"

      I like where this could go. Cracked had great coverage on Brazil's elections that probably have someone running as the tooth fairy :)

      -Matt

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
  3. Even Credible Links... by michael_rendier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Facebook's sponsored links are no better these days...wrapping you around multiple malware sites for the illusion of free tickets to Dark Knight Rises...takes less than two clicks to find either boobs or 'three of these offers must be completed plus five subsequent offers but never'... Imagine that...people believing everything they read on the internet... Or how i purchased a Hulu account with some thought that it would reduce the number of commercials...which actually increased (i apparently only purchased the ability to watch on my PS3????) Telling people that others will like them if they pay money...SMH

    --
    There are three kinds of people in the world. Those that can count, and those that can't.
  4. Pot, kettle... by bitslinger_42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm bemused that the story about people padding their fan list is broken up into four separate screen pages, with only 5 paragraphs on the first page (I didn't bother to go any further), but the story itself was prefaced with an ad, had 8 full-fledged ad blocks on the main page, plus many more blocks with links to other stories and the various "Like me on X" buttons.

  5. +1 very interesting article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    +1 very nice and informative article. if you are interested in a similar topic, please be checking my blog here...

  6. More to it than that by JazzHarper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On Facebook, high profile users not only pay to get more followers, but once they do, they must pay again to actually communicate with them. Unless you pay, FB only lets postings go to a few hundred followers. If you want more people to see your post, you have to pay a fee to "promote" your post. If you have 1 million followers, it can cost close to $1k per posting.

    During the dotcom bubble, companies were ridiculed for business plans that were based entirely on "selling eyeballs". FB has taken the same business concept to next level. I'd like to see an independent audit of Facebook's DAU metric and their 1 billion MAU claim. The company asserts that only about 8% of user profiles are fake and no analysts challenge that statistic. Clearly, it is not in Facebook's interest to weed out fake accounts; on the contrary, their revenue depends on them.