Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Regulator Orders Telecoms To Tell Us What It Costs To Run Their Service

bshell writes "Canada's CRTC (like the FCC) has finally asked telecoms to provide information about how much their services actually cost. Quoting a Montreal Gazette story: 'In a report I wrote last year, I estimated the markup for Internet services was 6,452 per cent for Bell's Essential Plus plan, which provides a two-megabits-per-second speed for $28.95 (prices may have changed since last year).' The markup is likely similar in the U.S. It's about time that we consumers found out what it really costs to provide Internet service, and for that matter telephone and wireless services, so we can get a fair shake."

3 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Re:not really that simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't get this issue here. Most of these companies are publicly traded, so you have access to their financials. Go look for yourself if you want to know what their operational profit margin is.

  2. Re:not really that simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    actuallly, most of the fixed costs that you would imagine telcos pay to secure rights of way, lay wire, etc. etc. is heavily subsidized by taxpayers, so effectively we're paying for that part, too, even if we don't subscribe to their ridiculously overpriced internet service

  3. Re:not really that simple. by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 4, Informative

    The markup is large but I suspect it is no where near that by the time you add in advertising (print, TV, cold/warm calls), collections activities, billing legal etc. The ISP business might very well be like Coke: 1% cost what is in the bottle and all the rest is branding and service around that. If investors really got to make 6000+% on there money the market would flood with people wanting those returns and the prices would drop.