Slashdot Mirror


Our Weather Satellites Are Dying

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that some experts say it is almost certain that the U.S. will soon face a year or more without crucial weather satellites that provide invaluable data for predicting storm tracks. This is because the existing polar satellites are nearing or beyond their life expectancies, and the launching of the next replacement, known as JPSS-1, has slipped until early 2017. Polar satellites provide 84 percent of the data used in the main American computer model tracking the course of Hurricane Sandy, which at first was expected to amble away harmlessly, but now appears poised to strike the mid-Atlantic states. The mismanagement of the $13 billion program to build the next generation weather satellites was recently described as a 'national embarrassment' by a top official of the Commerce Department. A launch mishap or early on-orbit failure of JPSS 1 could lead to a data gap of more than 5 years. The second JPSS satellite — JPSS 2 — is not scheduled for launch until 2022. 'There is no more critical strategic issue for our weather satellite programs than the risk of gaps in satellite coverage,' writes Jane Lubchenco, the under-secretary responsible for the Commerce Department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency. 'This dysfunctional program that had become a national embarrassment due to chronic management problems.' As a aside, I know from personal experience that this isn't the first time NOAA has been in this situation. 'In 1992 NOAA's GOES weather satellites were at the end of their useful lives and could have failed at any time,' I wrote as a project manager for AlliedSignal at that time. 'So NOAA made an agreement with the government of Germany to borrow a Meteosat Weather Satellite as a backup and drift it over from Europe to provide weather coverage for the US's Eastern seaboard in the event of an early GOES failure.'"

11 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Subcontract by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because the data would be in funny characters and the units would be in metric units and Americans would not understand it.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  2. Re:Next generation? by LaminatorX · · Score: 5, Funny

    The new weather satalites will access The Cloud to speed deployment and reduce support costs.

  3. We the people of germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    are on the one side glad to support our allies on our axis, but must decline the shipment of data that might harm the religious feelings of many american citizens.

    Weather is made by god, man shall not try to understand gods ways, because this would make man a god. Thus weather shall not be understood by the god fearing american people that replace a theory like evolution or the big bang theory by simpler means; creative design and the not so "creative beginning".

    A just kidding, take as much data as you need, because if you fear for your life you also sell your soul, aren't you ?

    1. Re:We the people of germany. by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Funny

      Usually I don't reply to ACs. This is an exception. As an Austrian resident ( and an atheist pig, to top it off ) I can not but wholeheartedly concur. Where are my mod points ??

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:We the people of germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I usually don't reply to ACs, as an AC or not, but I had to reply to this AC who replied to the other AC to say that I think replying to ACs is all right as long as you don't reply to ACs who post about replying to ACs. If you must reply to an AC who posts about replying to ACs, at least do so as an AC. Thanks.

    3. Re:We the people of germany. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Although German engineers excel at terrestrial technology, like BMW and Porsche, their space technology has not been nurtured. After the war, the Russians took their German scientists, to build their Russian space program, and the US took their German scientists, to build their US space program. Anyone who was left over in Germany was like the nerdy kid to get picked last for a team in school sports.

      In fact, the last German weather satellite was a total failure. It was called Satelliten Chefkoch Hauptleitungsabzweigklemme Überwachungstechnik Leitungsschutzschalter Teleauskunft Zeitverschiebung, or SCHULTZ for short. When queried about the weather, it simply replied:

      "I see NOTHING . . . NOTHING!"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  4. Weather control satellite? by GiantRobotMonster · · Score: 4, Funny

    A proper weather satellite would control the weather, rather than simply observe it.
    Then I could write my name in snow, across an entire continent.
    Muhahahaha.

  5. Re:Subcontract by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you really want to save money have China build the satellites. They might even launch them in geosynchronous orbit over the US for free.

  6. Serious question by sunami · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why are we building meteorological satellites when we have the Weather Channel?

  7. Space Cloudz by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Idiot! There aren't any clouds in space!

    The Magellanic cloud hereby invites you to a party. Also attending will be the Oort cloud, the Milky Way gas clouds, a molecular cloud from Andromeda, and an alcohol cloud of considerable refinement*. CHON will be served. Entertainment will be provided by black holes stripping electrons.

    *Only those from planets understood to be older than 6000 years may attend.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  8. Tornado Warning brought to you by Red Bull by PNutts · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Tornados also give you wings!" Cut to 30 second commercial.