Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Canadian Police Want New Internet Surveillance Tools

Posted by Soulskill on from the don't-we-all dept.

danomac writes "Police agencies in Canada want to have better tools to do online surveillance. Bill C-30 was to include new legislation (specifically Section 34) that would give police access to information without a warrant. This can contain your name, your IP address, and your mobile phone number. This, of course, creates all sorts of issues with privacy online. The police themselves say they have concerns with Section 34. Apparently, the way it is worded, it is not just police that can request the information, but any government agent. Would you trust the government with this kind of power?"

8 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. Fight this now! by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As somebody who grew up in Germany, I have seen ample historic precedent where this kind of snooping leads. Either fight it now or explain to your children in a decade or two why you did not prevent a surveillance state, where there is no free speech and no tolerated dissent.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Fight this now! by gweihir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot supports pseudonymity. That does not break anonymity. Your argument is wrong.

      ACs are just people that it is rarely worthwhile to listen to as they do not participate in the reputation system.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Fight this now! by Jessified · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. The headline should have read: "Police Everywhere Want New Internet Surveillance Tools"

  2. free society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As the comments of the linked article suggest, there is no reason police can't get a warrant.

    Of course that would entail some pillow talk...I mean probable cause arguments to a judge, I suppose. If even this tiny bit of protection is to be stripped away then all hope is truly lost for our free society.

  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can get a warrant very easily. Why do they want the power to go around that? If you have followed the HUGE outcry against C-30 you would also know that there will be no paper trail behind these requests either and politicians would also be allowed to make such requests. The current Canadian federal government is corrupt and shady and Canadians have already made it abundantly clear that we do not want this bill to pass.

  4. Would you trust the government...? by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That question is pure flamebait... Put it in a Slashdot poll

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  5. Simply not acceptable by cheros · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a very important issue at stake here: transparency.

    The ability to breach your privacy is a privilege granted to law enforcement for the purpose of fighting crime, but it is a privilege. The use of that privilege has to have just cause, which is what the whole warrant system is supposed to check.

    The UK already has a problem with warrantless intercept based on a combination of RIPA 2000 and the magic word "terrorist", and from what I hear it is abused with gay abandon. Don't go there..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  6. Re:Works two ways. by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the internet bullies this week, what with that girl committing suicide and such.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism