Slashdot Mirror
Canadian Researchers Create Wireless Charger For Electric Cars
An anonymous reader writes "University of British Columbia researchers have developed a wireless charging system for electric cars. It involves a spinning magnet beneath the parked vehicle which turns another magnet in the underside of the car. Charging takes four hours and is about 90% as efficient as plugging in. From the article: '"One of the major challenges of electric vehicles is the need to connect cords and sockets in often cramped conditions and in bad weather," says David Woodson, managing director of UBC Building Operations.
"Since we began testing the system, the feedback from drivers has been overwhelmingly positive."
Four wireless charging stations have been installed at UBC's building operations parking lot. Tests show the system is more than 90 per cent efficient compared to a cable charge. A full charge takes four hours and enables the vehicle to run throughout an eight-hour shift.'"
OK, so it can double as a garage heater in winter. However, in the snowier parts of the country (i.e. NOT Vancouver and its suburbs), this will not be appreciated for outdoor use - lots of meltwater turning into smooth ice...
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
In other news, the birth rate in Canada has mysteriously dropped to close to zero. And the beer in the garage fridge doesn't seem to get as cold as it used to.
Seriously is that the best that these engineers can come up with?
Coils should be much lighter and can accomplish the same end result. Also not new, see electric toothbrushes.
These engineers must be hacks. Wireless charging does not require turning a generator on the thing to be charged.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
I can only assume that this hopefully is a method that increases efficiency, but my first thought would be that if you have a magnet spinning nearby underneath a car, why not just put a coil in the car and generate electricity that way? Adding a second magnet just seems like it would add weight and mechanical complexity.
But if they went that route, I suppose they must've had good reason.
Not if I'm paying for the electricity. I don't really feel like paying 10% extra to charge my car for the convenience of not having to plug it in. How much more does this charging system cost and how much does it add to my car's weight? Qualitatively, let's estimate that as "too much."
This will never work (for me!). Because people (just me!) use their cars continually, never stopping for long enough to get a charge. Everybody is a road nomad, a street shark...
can i beam this at people ....no really this sounds like real fun tech /me goes off to write a sci fi movie based on it all
all those electrons zipping about....
Canadian Researchers Create Wireless Charger For Electric Cars
7.7 Magnitude Quake Hits British Columbia
Canadian Police Want New Internet Surveillance Tools
Canadian Teenager Arrested For Photographing Mall Takedown
And here I thought the whole point of going to an electric car was to become more efficient and green, wasting less power to random heat but now that it's been shown that people don't want to stand out in the rain, snow, overly hot weather, or in any place inconvenient, to plug in a charging cable (a task which most people would not be up to anyway unless it looked like an iPod earphone jack) we're going to give up some of that efficiency in the name of personal comfort.
Oh, the duplicity of it all.
It involves a spinning magnet beneath the parked vehicle which turns another magnet in the underside of the car.
Oh wow, it's a jumbo Magnetic Stir Plate! Perfect for that 1000L Erlenmeyer Flask in your garage.
I have visions of the recharge lane.
Not that I'm complaining... I'm just a bit surprised. News for nerds north of the 49th.... If this was November, I'd suspect some sort of alliteration joke to be forthcoming.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
OK now go get a snow saucer and tape a few strong magnets on some inside edges. go out to the parking lot. Put a quarter into the meter, sit, and spiiiiiin !
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
This is used all of the time in pumps where you don't want a dynamic seal. You have permanent magnets spun by a motor and inside a sealed case the pump is coupled by a magnetic field.
http://www.proconpumps.com/brands/Magnetically-Coupled-Pump-(Sealless).html
I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
And now that battery powered vehicles are becoming more main-stream, we can use oil when and where it's more useful (planes, trucking, remote power generating, etc.)
Why not make it a two-part transformer? You'd just have a spinning magnetic field with no moving parts. You would also eliminate two extra rotary electrical machines (the motor in the charger and the generator in the car).
Ezekiel 23:20
Thank you, Nikola Tesla.
The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
I knew if I waited long enough I would get my wind-up toys back. But why aren't they using a big spring?
And you could have recharging 'pads' which the CD car can find and recharge without human assistance.
Never mind all the other benefits of computer driven cars - make money while at work by being a taxi, driving kids to after school events, slip-streaming on motorways, less accidents and bumper to bumper in cities to reduce congestion.
For once a bunch of tech coming together to make world a safer, easier and cleaner place in 10 years time.
Depending on how much duct tape is involved this sounds more like something from the Red Green show that from a university.
"Remember, if the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
How about using steam engines instead? They're lots more efficient than anything else, and with today's technology, they could probably do wonders.
Or maybe it's not possible because of those patent things, since this is USA we're talking about. No, wait, it says Canada, nevermind, same thing anyway.
Brilliant. I'd make a teensy change. Replace the spinning magnet outside the car with a cable, and replace the spinning magnet and generator in the car's underbody with a plug. Run power through the cable to the plug, but only after there's been a handshake between the cable and the plug. Use the equipment that would spin the magnets to establish a physical connection between the cable and the plug.
I think the efficiency of this, compared to old techniques, will be closer to 100% of existing efficiency than to 90%.
...is more than paid for in the efficiency gained by not having to: train employees to plug their cars in; actually have employees take the time to plug them in; train the parking attendants to check the cars are plugged in, time lost to inclement weather for outdoor stations, ...
It may be "old tech" but the fact there could be a whole parking garage of wirelessly charging electric vehicles that _isn't_ a glowing electromagetic dome of inteference should be exciting.
This is technology rapidly pedaling backwards! Think of the wear and extra materials associated with this crazy scheme. I know that academics are under pressure to produce output of any kind, but this is an extreme example. Electric vehicles have many challenges, but plugging them in in bad weather is NOT "One of the major ones...". Roofs and other forms of shelter were a well-established human invention in pre-history.
This is a classic case of someone with a spinning magnet looking for an application. And what's worse, someone is giving him our taxes to play with it...
Parking lots are normally plowed to be clear of snow. If the space was not plowed than how would the car park there to charge anyway? Your post does not make a lot of sense when you think about it.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Where is my affordable electric car that I can charge with this black magic? :\
As a former employee of the University of British Columbia (UBC), in Vancouver, Canada, I can tell you this is just spin on a nothing story. The UBC Public Relations department releases very good spin press releases of very dubious quality stories (every week) just to stay in the news. This is a nothing story, other than being less efficient and heavier than commercially available induction charging systems. Just how difficult is is to plug in an electric car?
Stories like this (and low pay for staff) is why I left after 25 years (yeah, I know, should have left sooner...).
I foresee losses due to eddy currents induced in the chassis of many cars. Because metal (usually steel) is the predominant chassis material currently and in the foreseeable future.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
I think I would go with the cable myself, you would also save a few thousand on car and wireless transmitter as well I imagine.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
Spinning magnet under garage floor: Just don't let any pets with ferrous collars in there @ charging time. Ouch! (--> MEOWWW!)
So does this mean that you would need to do a 100% perfect parking job to get the 90%, and if you were off by a few inches it would go way down, be off by a half a foot and it would not work at all?
It seems to me that parking the car perfectly would be significantly more work than just getting it within reach of a cable.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
Parking lots are normally plowed to be clear of snow. If the space was not plowed than how would the car park there to charge anyway?
Just go to Ontario, or Maine, or Finland, or Sweden. There's lots of snow in winter, and parking lots (although plowed quite often) are rarely free of it. Cars drive on snow and can drive on quite a depth of packed snow or a few inches of unpacked snow. In fact, driving on snow is not at all difficult, especially with proper winter tires or even just with all-season radials, and nor is parking on snow.
Your post does not make a lot of sense when you think about it.
Actually, your response indicates that you have much to learn about driving in cold climates. Perhaps you should actually experience a colder climate, instead of just theorizing about it.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
I own a Chevy Volt. I've charged it in the rain without being killed. This is a solution in search of a problem. I'm not about to give up 10% efficiency to save about 3 seconds of time spent plugging-in (my charger is mounted on the garage wall directly adjacent to the charge port). I already lose about 14% in charging inefficiencies, and this "solution" ups that to 24% ? No thanks
Form 1980's to present we did somewhat the same thing and it is still being used at Disney, UAL, a few captive trollys, and once on the GM EV-1. We bury a primary in the ground, put the secondary of a transformer in the car. Works great, the systems are still running after all these years. The basic physics is that of a transformer and simple control / charging system. No spinning magnets, smaller footprint and lighter. This work came from Lawrence Berkeley Labs and later went into private industry.
Anon:
Former Inductran engineer.
Wireless power has been done before.
A more complicated solution involving inductive nearfield power was developed by GE for electric cars around 5 years ago, and they've demonstrated a near finished commercial product, asserted it was safe that would even work underwater, and wouldn't short.
Yes, there was a slashdot article, no I can't find it. They tried selling it to san franciso, but they opted out, as the unknown effects of high power RF.
Why not just plug in via a connector in the ground that can attach at the press of a button. That would be cheaper, simpler, easier to maintain, more efficient, ..., ..., ... Numpties.
all fun and good til little johnny rides his ferrous tricycle over it
If cars can be charged wirelessly, why couldn't there be a system in place such that cars recieve needed power from infrastructure along highways. Batteries as backup and "off-grid" travel only. Seems this could be TOTALLY doable now.
Must suck to live in Canada.
This was the exact point that came to my mind.
The spinning magnet is going to need to maneuver into place anyway, why not just eschew the spinning part and once in it's aligned itself, plug in a port, thereby not losing that extra 10%.
You would need some pretty strong magnets, I would think. Strong magnetic fields can be very hazardous to people with pacemakers.
IRRC the biggest unknown with these chargers is that it's effects on a small animal that chooses to sit right in the path of the inductance loop is largely unknown.
It's a bigger issue than you would think, since it does put out some heat, it is extremely likely that your family cat will find a new favorite sleeping place under the car.
Granted the biggest risk might be that of a 'squashing' incident when you park or drive off without first checking for your loved one; but the effects on living tissue of spending hours sitting on top of a giant electromagnet are not exactly known.
We know that running a 60 watt TV from across the room via inductance has zero effect on human health - but running 12.5kW through a cat is a slightly different equation.
The J1772 plug has five pins: Two for power, ground, pilot signal, and interlock. The interlock pin is wired to a bit of circuitry in the plug. The car checks for this circuit and won't come out of park if it is present.
Additionally, the pilot signal is what tells the car the amount of available amperage, since that's something the car cannot sense, like voltage. I won't bother to go through all of the details of the handshake, but this piece of information is provided by the duty cycle of the 1Khz square wave pilot signal, with 50% indicating 30A available. Not only does this let the car know what power is available so it won't try and draw too much, the amount of power can change over time (when there is, say, a power shortage) and the car responds accordingly.
The plug is also designed so that the signal pins disengage before the power pins, so both ends can sense the impending disconnect and stop the flow of power, preventing arcing.
The plug is also designed to be safe to use in wet conditions. There's also a ground fault detector.
With the exception of the ground fault, which I haven't tried to test for obvious reasons, I can attest to the fact that all of this works flawlessly on the Leaf. The situation with the Tesla Model S is more complex since there's an adapter involved and I haven't been willing to play with it to see what happens, but if anything it should be harder to move the Tesla in park since the emergency break engages automatically.
EVs used to be a big hacked up mess but that time is long since past.
This is a problem with the pacemakers, not the magnets, because it's a "feature" built into the pacemakers by design--see here: http://www.openanesthesia.org/index.php?title=Pacemakers/AICDs#Magnets
"Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
The plug really should be in front, right in the center. Not sure why they tend to be on the side - as if you're going to pull up to a charging station and stand there pumping electrons for 6 hours.
A wireless charger. Talk about wasting energy. The low power ones are very inefficient and high power is even worse. An electric car to save energy and then charge it with a wireless charge...what a contradiction.
I hate getting out in the winter to fuel my car, so I'm going to open the remote-release gas cap and let the gasoline pump squirt fuel at it. Only a gallon or so per visit will be lost. No biggie.
10% loss is unacceptable.
Converting fossil fuel into electricity represents a 65% reduction of energy potential.
Renewables is largely bollocks greenwash.
Reducing the energy potential of FF even further by using EM induction charging for a bloody silly car for the sake of some touch my fanny convenience should insult the intelligence of any idiot.
The problem here is how to change human behaviour so we no longer need to ponce about in stupid fucking cars in order to make an economy function.
Pfff.
damn how lazy are people