Slashdot Mirror


China Building a 100-petaflop Supercomputer Using Domestic Processors

concealment writes "As the U.S. launched what's expected to be the world's fastest supercomputer at 20 petaflops, China is building a machine that is intended to be five times faster when it is deployed in 2015. China's Tianhe-2 supercomputer will run at 100 petaflops (quadrillion floating-point calculations per second), according to the Guangzhou Supercomputing Center, where the machine will be housed. Tianhe-2 could help keep China competitive with the future supercomputers of other countries, as industry experts estimate machines will start reaching 1,000-petaflop performance by 2018." And, naturally, it's planned to use a domestically developed MIPS processor

13 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yeah right by fredprado · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep telling yourself that. I am sure you will sleep better at night...

  2. But Americans will sell them the insurance by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because that's all America does anymore.

  3. Re:Yeah right by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, given the nature of Chinese copying, plus the kind of overstated and shoddy output we've historically seen from State-Capitalist projects from Soviet governments, I think that the burden is more on the Chinese to make this boast a reality.

    Building massive, highly functional supercomputers is not child's play, regardless of your beowulf clusters of hot grits down Natalie Portman's pants experience. It's one thing to cluster a few computers together and to have very specific programs that do very specific kinds of jobs, it's another matter entirely to have hundreds or thousands of microprocessors working in tandem and to be able to simply even allocate their tasks, let alone program for them. There's a reason why every city government has their own supercomputer, they're difficult.

    The Chinese government has the resources to build such a computer, but only if they work against corruption and don't delude themselves when they have difficulties in an effort for every middle manager to safe face.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Re:Yeah right by fredprado · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Chinese technology has already gone much farther than you give them credit, and the natural tendency is for them to surpass stagnated US sooner or later. Considering how US has put in place so many impediments to innovation with the excuse of "helping innovation" that is just a matter of time.

    And please, although the Chinese government is very corrupt, it is not more corrupt than US government or US corporations.

  5. Could You Clarify Something for Me? by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're right, but it looks like they've done the latter. http://laotsao.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/sw1600-and-alpha-21164/

    It says right in the ShenWei Wikipedia article that it's based on the DEC Alpha but something that strikes me as curious is that your article refers to a chip that lasted from 1995 to 1998. So I am to believe that by outright copying a fifteen year old chip from a processor line that has been extinct for a decade or more has yielded a modern day competitive multiprocessing chip?

    You can convince me they copied DEC's work. You can convince me they violated IP laws. You can convince me that it is their societal norm to ignore restrictive IP laws. Hell, I'll tell you that right now. But to say that they are doing no work to build on top of these chips feels like it must be erroneous unless what we see is 1990s technology in the ShenWei processors.

    This isn't a black and white scenario here. Yes, it's bad that IP laws have been violated. Yes, it's bad that DEC won't see a dime from any of their work being used. But it is also a good thing to have a competitive architecture arise in the world of computing and also it feels good to have a race with other countries for computing power. I can only hope our super computing budget is considered part of the onerous "defense budget" and our leaders who are concerned with a dick measuring contest can dump tons of money into supercomputers for modeling and simulation to scientists while at the same time being able to give the hallowed talking point of "I increased defense spending."

    You can start with someone else's good idea, turn it into a great idea and share some credit, right?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Could You Clarify Something for Me? by guruevi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why is it bad that DEC (a defunct company) can't profit from their imaginary property in a country that has no protection from or laws against such use. The US Government can also appropriate technology and materials from private corporations within their sovereign state without compensation.

      DEC attempted to market their solution and failed miserably, they made their money back by selling it to Intel (so actually it's currently Intel's Imaginary Property). If someone else can improve upon their design (which was quite good actually especially in floating point operations) then I can only applaud their work. Just because it's the boogeyman-du-jour that's developing it doesn't make a difference to me.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Could You Clarify Something for Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That old Alpha chip did about 5 GFLOPS with a single core on 666Mhz, so 16 of these at 1.1Ghz would go up to about the 140GFLOPS that are stated on the wikipedia on the ShenWei SW1600. Thats about twice as fast as an i7-930@4.2 Ghz.

      So so much for decades old technology. It was just abondoned because there was to little market for it, but that doesn't mean it's bad stuf.

    3. Re:Could You Clarify Something for Me? by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever used one of those things? They were amazing chips for their time, especially with their bus architecture. They were great for SMP usage.

      AMD and Intel managed to get ahold of a lot of the developers and IP related to these chips, and wedged it into their systems. I'd be very surprised if you still couldn't find traces of it in their systems today. I know not long after AMD got their share, their SMP performance shot up massively, and when it comes to SMP use, they are still better at it than Intel (though, their per-core lack of performance, sadly makes up for this).

      So, yeah, with a die shrink, I could see these being amazing for a multi-core behemoth, and competitive with anything extant on the market right now. The only reason we don't see these today, I suspect, is because Intel got most of the IP, and used it to make the Itanium, and the wouldn't produce a competitor for their pet pink elephant.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Could You Clarify Something for Me? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was just abondoned because there was to little market for it,

      No, it was abandoned because HP/Compaq ended up owning the Alpha and PA-RISC and Intel convinced them that they could lower costs by outsourcing their CPU design and use Itanium instead. There were still a lot of people who wanted to buy new Alphas, and they got stuck with Itaniums instead. The ones that weren't on VMS or NonStop just gave up and switched to commodity x86 and some open source *NIX.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Could You Clarify Something for Me? by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      That old Alpha chip did about 5 GFLOPS with a single core on 666Mhz, so 16 of these at 1.1Ghz would go up to about the 140GFLOPS that are stated on the wikipedia on the ShenWei SW1600. Thats about twice as fast as an i7-930@4.2 Ghz.

      You're right. Alpha CPUs were, AFAIK, quite well-suited for multicore operation, though the Chinese must have created some impressive glue logic.

      The original 21164 was implemented using a paltry (by today's standards) 10 million transistors. Using 350 nm technology, at that. The Chinese are capable of reducing that by about an order of magnitude, achieving a significant speedup because of the smaller gates - that's just by using the new cleanroom microfabrication tech.

      Actually, I'm wishing good luck to the Chinese engineers. And a big fat "fuck you" to the managers/CxOs that doomed the amazing technologies from DEC (Alpha wasn't the only one that died on the chopping board of corporate stupidity).

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  6. Re:Yeah right by fatphil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are you confusing them for a country that hasn't already stuck a machine right at the top of the top500 list?

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  7. Re:Yeah right by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And please, although the Chinese government is very corrupt, it is not more corrupt than US government or US corporations.

    It's very fashionable to overstate the problems of the US. Even with all it's problems it remains one of the most successful systems in the world on any number of levels.

    That said, the rampant corruption on China isn't the kind that will interfere with things like building a supercomputer. Quite the opposite in fact. Need a neighborhood demolished or workers expropriated? No problem.

    Where as the much smaller level of corruption in the US is almost precisely targeted to screw these kinds of projects. Congressman can't tack on some random spending for their district? Screw over the whole project just to build a reputation so everyone bends over next time.

  8. Re:Yeah right by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the natural tendency is for them to surpass stagnated US sooner or later

    Probably later. Its common for Chinese fanbois to paint the US as some stagnant, bloated, lethargic country, and in some ways it is, but not in technology. The US still leads the world in technical innovation, and China is still playing catchup, and will for some time. Militarily China is 20 years behind in submarine technology, has one aircraft carrier (Russian surplus), is just now introducing stealth technology in its aircraft, and still sends most of its elite students to US schools for hi-tech education. Oh, and lets not forget the army of hackers the Chinese government STILL employs to spy on American hi-tech corporations right now.

    NATURAL tendancy? How is that? 100 years ago China was nation of drug addicts beholden to the British Empire. Natural tendancy my ass. The US is mired in debt and a stuck bureaucracy right now, but to count it out is a bit premature.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'