Man Charged £2,000 For Medical Records Stored On Obsolete System
An anonymous reader writes "In Britain, where it is custom and practice to charge around £10 for a copy of your medical results, a patient has discovered that his copy will cost him £2,000 because the records are stored on an obsolete system that the current IT systems cannot access. Can this be good for patient care if no-one can access records dating back from a previous filing system? Perhaps we need to require all current systems to store data in a way that is vendor independent, and DRM-free, too?"
I'd take Britain's system over here in the US where paramedics check to see if you have a valid insurance card before they check your pulse... and if you are not insured, they just mark "coded" and go on.