Amazon To Launch Sydney Data Center
schliz writes "Amazon Web Services will unveil its first Australian data centers on Tuesday, ending more than a year of speculation. The move is expected to address enterprises' data soverignty and latency concerns, although local cloud providers argue that data held by U.S. company Amazon would still be subject to the Patriot Act."
Singapore or nearby would be better, our international pipes suck at the moment.
I agree with you 100%.
Nope, its true. I used to work for a US owned company in Australia - because of US law, we had to do everything in accordance with Sarbanes–Oxley. It was a royal pain in the ass - 100% pure bureaucracy - and just about doubled the work required to do most of our tasks.
Thankfully, I'm not working there anymore - but that little glimpse into American life really, really made me glad I wasn't working in IT in the US...
Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
IT falls under the US patriot ACT as it is a US company and hence having a datacentre in Australia doesn't actually solve the data sovereignty issues at all as the US can seize the data from the Company.
It seems you have confused two completely different legal regulations. Sarbannes Oxley and the Patriot Act are two totally different things for two totally different reasons.
Way down in Tasmania.
The WISP is expanding in the DC arena - http://www.tasmanet.com.au/data-centre/
It seems you have missed the point of the example of US law applying to US operations offshore.
especially about band camp... it should be illegal to shove a flute in one's pussy
Amazon is putting a DC in Australia.. not that big a deal, now wait until Blizzard puts some servers out here, I'd vote for a bloody Public Holiday.
You have 5 Moderator Points!
Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
Sounds like the legal team failed to properly setup a subsidiary.
The company I work for deals with complex legal matters. We have data center presence in Canada, APAC and Europe specifically to address the concerns of clients in those jurisdictions who do not want to be subjected to the uncertainties of the PATRIOT Act. It is possible to do it. The cloud providers are spouting FUD.
They should have set up an Australian subsidiary that wouldn't be beholden to any US laws.
Learn to love Alaska
Yeah, it's amazing how people screw up international business. It's a field all its own, and all the time I see people trying to go it alone - even successful people. Get some damn specialists even if they cost money. You'll save a bundle in the long run.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Earthquakes and active volcanoes in Napoli or Bari? Maybe Catania has Etna, but you clearly know little about Etna eruptions ...
It'd be the same risk for Sidney, then.
Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
If you're worried about refreshments, see if you can convince Amazon to move the DC to Melbourne.
Nope, its true. I used to work for a US owned company in Australia - because of US law, we had to do everything in accordance with Sarbanes–Oxley. It was a royal pain in the ass - 100% pure bureaucracy - and just about doubled the work required to do most of our tasks.
I'm current working for a US company in Australia, and I never have to think about SOX. We automated all of the SOX stuff into the background, so day to day I work oblivious to these things.
Didn't you have automation and process improvement to do the same?
Sparks:Gadget:Beer Maker
Yes, it would be an American asset. The US could seize it, but orders against internal workings in a foreign company are not the same thing.
Learn to love Alaska
that sounds more like pidgin from the pacific isles (used to be the staple labour force for working the cane farms in queensland)