Slashdot Mirror


UW Imposes 20-Tweet Limit On Live Events

theodp writes "GeekWire's Taylor Soper reports that the University of Washington has capped live sports coverage at 20 Tweets per basketball game (45 for football) and threatens to revoke the credentials of journalists who dare exceed the Twitter limits. Tacoma News Tribune reporter Todd Dybas was reportedly 'reprimanded' after drawing the ire of the UW Athletic Dept. for apparently Tweeting too much during UW's 85-63 Sunday win over Loyola."

7 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Points by Lord+Lode · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In basketball, usually more points get made than goals get made in football so shouldn't the tweet limit be higher for basketball?

    1. Re:Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A football game is 90 minutes, 45 minutes each half.

  2. Re:and....? by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    “I think just generally speaking is what we’re trying to do is steer people toward partnerships we have with radio, television and our own web presence,” Moore said. “We don’t want people taken way from that experience.”

    that it's supposedly an university.. sounds to me like it's a pro sports team first and everything else second.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  3. Re:Fair enough I suppose by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    But in this case it's not their employer imposing the restriction. It's the University, who don't want people "tuning" into Twitter for a play-by-play - they want them tuning in to the local radio or TV stations that have paid handsomely for the broadcast privileges.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  4. Please stop posting! by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    This story has a 20 post limit, please stop posting or your account may be revoked.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  5. Re:Fair enough I suppose by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just adore the way that the school's PR weasel manages to word it as though those cruel journalists are tearing innocent readers 'away from that experience', rather than admit the obvious "apparently following the game on twitter is more engaging than watching or listening to it, at least as broadcast by our paying partners"...

  6. Re:Fair enough I suppose by homsar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can you imagine a reporter having their word limit set by the organisation they're covering rather than their own publication? And being asked to write the article as the event occurs, in real time?