Motorola Wants 2.25% of Microsoft's Surface Revenue
An anonymous reader writes "On the opening day of a patent trial between Microsoft and Google-owned Motorola Mobility, Motorola filed a brief (PDF) arguing that the WiFi tech central to the case is also critical to Microsoft's new Surface tablet. Motorola says royalties totaling 2.25% of all Surface revenues is a good starting point. They wrote, 'Microsoft's new Surface tablet will use only 802.11, instead of cellular or wired connections, to connect to the internet. Without 802.11 capability, the Surface tablet would be unable to compete in the market, because consumers can readily select tablet devices other than the Surface that have 802.11 capability.' Microsoft, of course, says this figure is outrageous, given 'Motorola's promise to standards bodies to offer access to the "standard essential" patents on fair and reasonable terms.'"
Why does Google get so low that they need to have proxy patent wars with Microsoft? Why can't they leave MS alone or at least sue them themselves?
It's alright.
If anyone is on Google's side in this, you're a bloody hypocrite.
"This is different, blah blah" yeah shut up.
Anyone who supports this FRAND patent abuse because its Microsoft and, you know - fuck Microsoft, they deserve it, is being horribly shortsighted and a hypocrite. This is gross abuse of FRAND agreements and sets a dangerous president and, just because its Google vs Microsoft doesn't make it ok.
Abuse of FRAND patents is abuse of FRAND patents regardless of who does it and to whom it is done.