Slashdot Mirror


Apple Orders Memory Game Developers To Stop Using 'Memory' In Names

An anonymous reader writes with this bit of trademark absurdity from geek.com: "Ravensburger is a German gaming company that specializes in jigsaw puzzles, but has also expanded into other areas such as children's books and games. The company owns the trademark to a board game called 'Memory' and has demanded Apple stop offering apps that have the word 'memory' in their title or as a keyword associated with an app. It may seem ludicrous such a common word can be trademarked, but apparently this is a valid claim as Apple is now serving notices to app developers. The choice an infringing app developer has is to either rename their app or remove it from the App Store."

2 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Overreaching? by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does this apply to all apps or just games? If it's just games then the claim may be indeed be legitimate (or not), but if it's all apps then it's certainly a case of overreaching by the trademark holder (or else an overreaction by Apple).

    The most ridiculous element is the ban on the use of "memory" as a keyword. Trademark law was never intended to forbid others from naming competitors' products or from using trademarked words in their descriptive sense ("this game will enhance your memory and give you super-strength!").

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  2. Re:It's actually a fairly sensible reaction by Desler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Due process does not apply here. Due process is a requirement on the State to respect the accuser's rights. Apple is not bound by due process.