Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Granted Patent For Augmented Reality Glasses
another random user writes with an excerpt from the BBC about Microsoft's vision for augmented reality glasses: "A patent granted to the U.S. tech firm describes how the eyewear could be used to bring up statistics over a wearer's view of a baseball game or details of characters in a play. The newly-released document was filed in May 2011 and is highly detailed.
... Although some have questioned how many people would want to wear such devices, a recent report by Juniper Research indicated that the market for smart glasses and other next-generation wearable tech could be worth $1.5bn by 2014 and would multiply over following years."
Noticeable differences from Google's version: two lenses, a wrist computer, and wires.
Will this "augmented reality" be used in stores to help convince people to buy a Windows 8 phone?
I am with Richard Stallman and the FFII: Stop all the nonsensical software patent granting. All of them are a disgrace to professionals in the field, a hostile takeover from laywers and patent parasites.
30 years of cyberpunk and post-cyberpunk say, "Hi!" Not that it will count for anything under what America laughably calls calls a patent system.
Augmented reality is not a fad and its not going away.
It will start to creep into the mainstream in the next few years and will probably be ubiquitous in the developed world within 10.
There will be plenty of naysayers but that is solely due to their lack of vision, just like people said that tablet computing would never take off, that mp3 players were a flash in the pan, who would ever need an "app store," etc.
We are going to see some pretty remarkable (both bad and good) changes in the next decade, even in the face of what the Internet has already accomplished.
Seriously.
Unless it's indistinguishable from normal glasses, which it won't be, there's no market here outside of some very specific and special industries.
Why can't we have kick ass VR glasses, like Carmack is working on, instead?
Cool, yes. Is my mom going to want a pair? Probably not.
I cite the entire contact lenses industry as evidence.
Shenanigans!
..don't panic
You'll appreciate the cool blue tint of the screens of death.
I don't think depiction in fiction counts as prior art. If so, by this point Apple should be owned by the Roddenberry Estate.
...and this is not fiction? Last time I looked there were no practical working implementations of AR glasses.
This seems like just another "Do common task X but now on device Y" patent.
I would hesitate getting Google's reality glasses because it would mean that all my data would go to Google. Instead of that, Microsoft's version would process things independently on the wrist computer. That's a huge difference and suits to people who want to keep their privacy.
Doesn't look like it:
It indicates that most of the processing work - identifying people and other objects in view, and deciding what information to show about them - would likely be carried out by remote computer servers in order to keep the equipment slimline.
So you'll probably need a .NET Passport/Windows Live ID/Microsoft Account/whatever-they're-calling-it-tomorrow to use it.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
Shill
Such eloquence, such insight! Makes me wonder why I bothered to post this... oh wait, you're being a total douche aren't you?
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
From TFA: "It indicates that most of the processing work - identifying people and other objects in view, and deciding what information to show about them - would likely be carried out by remote computer servers in order to keep the equipment slimline."
I played AR games on my Treo. I'm sure you can find many for any modern smartphone.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
"First post"
Is there an issue with pointing out obvious shills?
I would hesitate getting Google's reality glasses because it would mean that all my data would go to Google. Instead of that, Microsoft's version would process things independently on the wrist computer. That's a huge difference and suits to people who want to keep their privacy.
Yeah but try getting it through airport security!
Not at all, if you're willing to back it up.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
More than a fad...more than cool and better than Rx; Cx glasses are disruptive game changers. They stand on the shoulders of the PC, Internet, SQL, 802.11xx and HUD at the corner of Fashion and Future hawking the promise of all knowing all seeing Superman intelligence. What kid isn't gonna want to be like that when he grows up? LOL
I work in the area, and:
Displaying some tables or gauges on your glasses is not augmented reality.
Filming stuff with them and displaying it somewhere else (a la Google Glasses), also is not even remotely augmented reality.
Actual augmented reality integrates. Actual augmented reality is stuff that fits itself into reality, and augments it.
Actual augmented reality would be when you walk through your city, and there’s a pillar there that isn't really there, and you can walk up to it, and trigger a switch. It is when you can have a rendered monster walk around the corner of the wall of a skyscraper. Actual augmented reality is seeing through walls because some database knows more about the other side. Or being able to tune the weather/theme of your view. Or just primitive stuff like having the shop windows display something different for everyone, depending on preconfigured preferences. (Or in my case, show nothing, since I would have an ad blocker.)
It’s when you see and hear things that aren't there, and don't see and hear things that are there, and it's not schizophrenia. ;)
This here, on the other hand, is shit.
With little white tiny letters, but blue nonetheless..
How are those glasses different from the computers, tablets and phones with cameras we always pass through airport security?
Not at all, if you're willing to back it up.
I don't know about you, but when someone with a brand-new account kicks off the discussion with a first post that praises Microsoft and denounces the competition, and that is their only comment, that looks rather odd to me.
When you remember that there have been a lot of new accounts doing exactly that over the course of this year - the Visual Studio ones being some of the most blatant - well, writing that off as normal user behaviour starts to look like burying your head in the sand.
The novel snowcrash profides prior art to all the wearable computer glasses/goggles thing. I know I have read the same thing in other books too, they just don't come to mind.
The whole patent thing is just so screwed up. If the guy who developed the waterbed was denied patent because of Stanger in a Strange Land, then the system as written already disallowed all this crap.
But that's just reason and logic.
Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
--"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
Um, his comment was posted before yours. Don't get all whiny about it.
I've been using AR glasses with my smart phone for YEARS.
It's often times faster to overlay the 3D noise source map (gathered from sensors in the field) over the readily available physical model -- Depth culling to remove obscured sources in real time (industrial noise abatement). Sometimes it's faster if the CAD files can be imported easily, to just do it digitally, even so, I can just turn off the cameras. I rarely used my phone when doing this sort of work, but I have done so. I've used it experimentally in the field to visualize the pre-recorded 3D noise volumes in real time walking (while all the equipment is safely turned off). It's safer and sometimes faster because it skips the step of constructing a 3D model of the environment.
No longer work in that field, but I now do some game development on the side, and I've found craploads of uses for AR in game dev... Overlay a wireframe of the scanned object to the real 3D clay model, correct minor defects, add wrinkle details, seams and screws and bolts. It's sort of like the modern equivalent of a painter working on a portrait with a live model. If the cameras didn't make me look silly (or pervy) I'd wear them in public to do "Google Glass" right now.
I abstain from reading any patents if I can. I hope MS's new patent is properly limited so that it doesn't PREVENT EXISTING USES OF AUGMENTED REALITY. No, really, just end all patents. This is retarding.
You win the 'Stating The Obvious Award'! Congratulations!
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
Proof 1 :
Proof 2, specifically time stamp, and FUD that would have been obvious if you RTFA instead of trolling
Microsoft's version would process things independently on the wrist computer
vs
[Patent] indicates that most of the processing work [...] would likely be carried out by remote computer servers [...].
These astroturfers have been operating in the same way for a long time (more than a year I think), posting first-posts pro-Microsoft Anti-Google FUD.
Do you carefully check each and every mail by some Nigerian wanting to transfer some big money via your account ? Maybe THAT one isn't a scam ?
I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
This is only a published patent application and not a granted patent. Big difference. I originally thought the blame lay with the BBC, but they have it right in the article, at least at the time I accessed it.
Nice try
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
Not at all, if you're willing to back it up.
OK, two points of proof to back up user Presentss is a shill.
1 - UID is 2780313 registered 11/23/2012 (aka Today)
2 - http://slashdot.org/~Presentss/comments
This is probably going to sound like a "get off my lawn" kind of post, but "augmented reality" bothers me. I go to baseball games and plays as an ESCAPE from reality. I don't want it "augmented" by screeds of information. I just want to enjoy the experience. Don't get me wrong, I think there are uses for augmented reality, but does life suck so bad for people that they cannot simply live it and enjoy it without cluttering it up?
Proverbs 21:19
The Personal System glasses from "Norbert and the System", a short story by Timons Esaias from 1993, may anticipate some of the features of this system. I haven't read the patent, but the overlay of contextual social information sounds a lot like what the original poster describes.
(Here's a link: http://www.sfcenter.ku.edu/Sci-Tech-Society/Esaias-Norbert.pdf)
Sean Ellis
Follow OfQuack's antics on Twitter.
This has been going on much longer than a year.
This was over a year and a half ago:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cdd1ea06-7cc0-11e0-994d-00144feabdc0.html
Burson-Marsteller, a WPP-owned PR agency whose clients also include Microsoft, contacted US newspaper reporters and opinion-piece writers with a view to securing coverage on Google’s alleged use of personal information from Facebook and other social networks.
MS vs ODF (2009):
http://techrights.org/2009/05/27/ghettoblaster-may-be-microsoft-astroturf/
MS vs Linux (2001):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/09/26/ms_targets_linux_mac_rivals/
There is so much more too....
I would hesitate getting Google's reality glasses because it would mean that all my data would go to Google. Instead of that, Microsoft's version would process things independently on the wrist computer. That's a huge difference and suits to people who want to keep their privacy.
Thank you for mentioning that, Presentss. You know, Microsoft(tm) products make everything I do easier and more enjoyable too!
These glasses will be a great add-on for Microsoft(tm) Windows 8(tm)! Ha ha ha (big smiles). Now let's both turn and look at the
camera while keeping these smiles frozen on our faces. Annnnnnd cut. Nice job, Presentss.
Apologies for not doing a full background check on all /. users I reply to.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
Are you so insecure that you need to re-post your own comment multiple times in a discussion about whether the OP is a shill? That's not even relevant and just makes you look like you're defending him because you want to be sure your reply is well modded or some other such vain nonsense.
Do you even understand the post you replied to here? The guy was making fun of you because you seem to think it's better to rationally argue with a 419 spammer than call them out/ignore/mod down/etc.
Please, do us all a favor and stop posting. Judging by your comment history, it would be a BIG favor.
They can record the TSA agents too, can't have that!!!
There is so much of this in the movies and in sci-fi that we've all see our futures with such a device, ever since our childhoods we have seen this. I don't see how this could fail the "obviousness" test. How much more proof does one need to show how broken the patent system is?
Sent from my ENIAC
The U.S patent system isn't even ridculous. Given that glasses is the next UI, should spesific content ble patentable?
Reminds me of light blue cowbos shoes: Only in America.
the new account is a good sign, but the comment is valid. Screw having the advertising giant strap a camera, gps, and screen to my face.
To be honest that's one point. Also your ignoring whether the comment has any value. I for one arn't thrilled about the idea of the biggest advertising giant and data analysis company in the world strap a camera, gps, and screen to my face.
So don't freaking buy one!
Seriously, if you can't control your actions so much that you purchase things you despise, you have no right to complain about the fact you purchased it.
And if you aren't going to purchase it, then what the hell are you bitching about?
Until a Google rep comes to your home with a gun pointed at your head, the GP has no point nor value to his shilling post.
i still want the tech just not from google, and considering this is a story about microsoft you can go fuck your self.
without the psychic stuff, the glasses reported someone not logging into facebook? must be a psychopath
enough said!!!!!!!! read the subject response........