Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Mining Reward About To Halve

First time accepted submitter ASDFnz writes "The reward for successfully completing a block (also called mining) is about to halve from 50 bitcoins to 25. From the article: 'Bitcoin is built so that this reward is halved every 210,000 blocks solved. The idea is as bitcoin grows the transaction fees become the main part of the reward and the introduction of new bitcoins slows down to a trickle. This also means that there will only ever be 21,000,000 bitcoins in circulation.' You can watch the countdown here."

15 of 600 comments (clear)

  1. Quick, calculate me another way to profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My parents won't let me mooch off their electricty forever.

  2. Re:Seems like the limit is too low for a viable by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yea it's too bad nobody ever though of that or else they might have made sure each one is divisible to eight decimal places or something.

  3. Re:Bitcoins built-in failure by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 5, Informative

    A BitCoin can be divided up into 8 decimal digits. So one BitCoin contains 1 billion discrete units that can be used for transactions.

  4. Re:who cares? by Teppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're being used quite a bit for online gambling because they allow for instant deposits, instant withdrawals, zero risk of charge-back, and for some online casinos, provably fair wagering.

  5. Additionally by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bitcoin will let us see if money is something that can truly exist without government, or if the anarchists were full of it. Bitcoin's success or failure will almost certainly tell us more about this than about deflationary spirals.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Additionally by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it will tell us that even in the most optimistic scenerio where Bitcoin achieves 100% market penetration, some people will go to their graves insisting that it won't work, isn't really money, and is all just a ponzi scheme.

      Conversely, if Bitcoin is around for 100 years and nobody but a handful of extreme-right libertarians thinks it's worth so much as a wooden nickel, we will have learned empirically that some people will always go to their graves still wishing for a pony.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Additionally by tftp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And yet I have more than a few friends who actively replace their surplus currency with gold, whenever they can

      Those are two big differences, as they say in Odessa. Purchasing physical gold from a reputable dealer (and taking delivery) is entirely unlike accepting a bar of unknown yellow metal from a stranger who just walked into your business and left with an expensive product just minutes later, never to be seen again.

      But I understand what you (and your friends) want to say. Unfortunately, preparing for TEOTWAWKI is counter to preparing for normal life. Your purchases are basically reversed. Most people cannot afford the bunker mentality, just because they need income from investments, they need to buy luxury items for their family, toys for their children, non-MRE food for everyday eating. There must be a balance, an exact instant in time when you understand that the life as you know it is not in the cards - and then you flip the bit and start working for the cellar.

      I personally don't believe gold will be valuable after the SHTF. You cannot eat gold - and food will be the top priority, competing for the first place with means of protection (weapons and ammo.) Gold cannot be sold after SHTF because there will be no market. You can always exchange a .223 round for a few cigarettes, and that barter does not require a market because both goods are directly usable. Gold is not usable, unless you need sinkers for fishing. Gold has to be exchanged on a market for something else that you need.

      My personal theory is that after SHTF there will be only two universal currencies: food and ammo. Nothing else will be even close. Perhaps ammo will be even more valuable because you cannot eat if you are dead; but if you have ammo you can get food (in the forest or elsewhere.) Additionally, food can be produced - cows don't read newspapers and they will continue their lifecycle. But ammo is a high-tech product, it cannot be easily put together even if you are into reloading. Once you run out of good cartridges and primers you are done for, even if you can cast your own [low quality] bullets.

      I have had no more success trying to convince them that conducting an economy based on precious metals after the collapse of American society will be difficult

      As you see, I'm not disagreeing with you here.

      the collapse of society -- for which they have also been stockpiling assault rifles, BTW -- is unlikely to occur in their lifetimes.

      That is not under our control. Do you think Syrians or Libyans or even Egyptians expected the Spanish Inquisition just a few years ago? But here they are now, in the midst of a civil war, or on ruins of a wealthy oil state, or preparing for said ruins to be made. Do not forget that the fall of USSR was news to places like CIA - which should have known; but they missed that and more. After USSR disintegrated several civil wars have broken out; some are still simmering. And if you look back into 1990-2000 you will see rich, happy Yugoslavia going up in smoke.

      The USA has a very fragile economy. First, it's an oil-based economy. No food can be grown or delivered without oil. Significant amounts of that oil come from abroad. There are needs that cannot be cut, so even a 20% cut in supplies will send the prices of gas to the sky - and the prices of food will follow. Oil is bought for dollars, and dollars are borrowed. Same happens with much of everything else that we currently receive on ships from China. This means that the country lives on credits - and the creditors may not be willing to finance this economy forever. In essence, not only I and you are not in control of the exact date of TEOTWAWKI, but even the government is not in control. The USA has too few native industries with exportable products to finance purchase of foreign energy; and domestic energy production is limited. I do not know for how long this economy will last, but it cannot last

  6. Oh God No... by hawks5999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get rid of them now. I suggest you send any bitcoins you have to this wallet address: 1AeCTNhF3Sovi8fkjq7Buy8sYoc2C4xoo4

  7. Re:Bitcoins built-in failure by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep. That's a feature of any currency without inflation, and why inflation is actually a good thing. It discourages hoarding. Neutral or deflationary currencies are only good for the people who already have a lot of them.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  8. I'm a Happy Camper by johnnysmith2012 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since now they girls doing video clips for bitcoins! http://www.videos4btc.info/

  9. Re:Quick find all the people that care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gold has actual mechanical uses (electrical contacts.) It also has bauble value.

    BitCoins have zero intrinsic value, and they require electric and Internet connectivity to be used. Gold requires a civilization level just a step above pure anarchy to be useful.

    IMHO, it is sort of suspicious that there is this ramp where early adopters get these bonuses, and people hopping on late end up having to put a lot more resources in for the same coins... that combined with the value of the currency going up/down in insane swings, makes it useless as anything other than a novelty.

  10. Who cares, the mining game is over anyways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to be big on the BTC mining thing. These days, however, it just doesn't matter anymore.

    I got into BTC fairly early, back when it was profitable to run the mining software on a single workstation to suck up unused cycles. At that time, it was actually profitable to invest in dedicated hardware to mine coins- so I (and a lot of other people) eventually did. My first dedicated rig was a HP ML350 G5, which set me back about $4000. It ran two 8 core processors and basically sat around all day mining bitcoins.

    Later on when the GPU accelerated mining took off, I bought and built four systems from off the shelf components, and the ML350 was rededicated to running ESXi with a bunch of VMs for mining and managing the four slaves. Each slave had 3x ATI GPUs, later those were swapped out for NVidia GPUs for other various software reasons.

    Then the FPGA (and later ASIC) players came into the game. It started with development boards (FPGA boards purchased direct from the chip manufacture), but later spiralled into custom FPGA boards in nice cases that you could stack or keep around on a metal shelving system easily enough. Now, the custom FPGA boxes for BTC mining basically put the GPU miners out of business- the introduction of FPGA hardware increased the BTC mining difficulty to the point that it was pointless wasting the power mining with anything other then.

    The problem was that by the time the FPGA market exploded, it was *barely* worth investing in the hardware to get in that late in the game. Previously, buying a few PCs and loading them with GPUs was a cheap way to make some extra cash. FPGAs however cost a hell of a lot more and the difficulty of mining BTCs had increased so much that you would barely break even, and you'd be bloody lucky if you actually made any money in the end.

    But FPGAs weren't good enough. People started thinking that they could build silicon to do things even faster, and thus the ASIC market started to emerge and take off. The problem here is that while an ASIC kicks the shit out of an FPGA (and anything that came before the FPGAs)- they're so expensive and the BTC difficulty has been bumped up so much by the initial ASIC wave and the FPGAs before it... That... Wait for it...

    Investing in ANY form of ASICs to make **any** kind of reasonable money... Means that you'll never actually break even.

    That's right, the ASICs they've got out there are so powerful and the BTC chain is becoming so difficult to mine, that if you invested $10K+ (which is what you'd have to spend) for a reasonable ASIC setup- you would never actually make any money. If your ASIC box is profitable, it won't be for long since the more ASIC miners join in on the party- the more difficult it becomes to mine BTCs.

    So the whole system has kind of spiralled into nothing. Mining isn't profitable anymore. Even if you invest in serious hardware. It just doesn't matter anymore, and now that the "reward" for mining BTCs is about to halve- it's even more of a waste of time then it was before. You could have made money in the beginning if you were there, but if you weren't- it's not worth investing even a dollar into hardware to mine BTCs anymore. That train has long since departed.

    BTC is basically just a currency now. Mining is vastly irrelevant and always will be, now that we've got FPGAs and ASICs flying around.

    -AC

    1. Re:Who cares, the mining game is over anyways. by norpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      During a gold rush the only person who actually gets rich is the man selling shovels.

  11. Re:Austrian economics by grumbel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What problem does it solve for normal people?

    It provides a censorship free way to transfer small amounts of money pseudonymously over the Internet, something regular payment providers still fail at (Paypal censors, proper bank transfers are far to expensive).

  12. Re:Bitcoins built-in failure by molecular · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The main advantages of Bitcoin over other types of "real" money:

      * it's censorship resistant (can't be shut down, just like bittorrent)
      * it has low transaction costs and low barrier to entry (freedom of economic transaction)
      * it can be transmitted via the internet globally in short time (max 1 hour)
      * it's cheap and easy to secure against theft and loss

    The additional advantages of Bitcoin over FIAT currencies:

      * the supply is limited
      * it's open source and not controlled by banking cartel or government, open to anyone

    The disadvantages of Bitcoin:

      * its acceptance is very low, to say the least
      * it's hard to understand and therefore hard to trust
      * it offers an ideal playground for criminals and scammers
      * you can add your own criticism here