Slashdot Mirror


British Pirate Party Asked To Pull Pirate Bay Proxy

judgecorp writes "The British Pirate Party has been asked by the music business organisation BPI to pull the plug on the Pirate Bay proxy it has been running. The Pirate Party provides a way round the court-ordered ban on ISPs providing connections to the file-sharing site, The Pirate Bay. So far the Pirate Party says the proxy is a 'legitimate route' to the site, but the BPI says the Pirate Bay is 'not above the law.'"

2 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Response on Behalf of UK Pirate Party: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dear BPI:

    We refer you to the response given in Arkell v. Pressdram.

    Good day.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Response on Behalf of UK Pirate Party: by fsterman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Shortcut,

      Arkell's lawyers wrote a letter which concluded: "His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply." The magazine's response was, in full: "We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell. We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off."

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?