Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo Puts a Bedtime On Wii U Content In Europe

kc67 writes "Nintendo of Europe is blocking Wii U content in the region that is rated PEGI 18+ between the hours of 3 a.m. and 11 p.m., according to a Eurogamer report. Under these stipulations, the four-hour window of 11 p.m. to 3 a.m. is the only time users can purchase games like ZombiU or Assassin's Creed III or even view trailers for such games. The story originated from a NeoGAF forum user, which reportedly received an email from Nintendo saying the following: 'Dear customer, we would like to let you know that Nintendo has always aimed to offer gameplay experiences suited to all age groups, observing carefully all the relevant regulations regarding content access that are present in the various European countries. We have thus decided to restrict the access to content which is unsuitable to minors (PEGI) to the 11 p.m.- 3 a.m. time window.' Eurogamer has since verified the claim. It received a message stating 'You cannot view this content' and 'The times during which this content can be viewed have been restricted.' Nintendo has yet to comment on the matter."

190 comments

  1. BEDTIME FOR BONZO !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back the old time rock and roll !!

  2. Reminds me of an RPG trope... by mister_playboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    RPGs with time passage often have stores that sell special goods at a specific ingame time... the "0200 special".

    Nintendo seems to have liked that idea enough to implement it in the real world. :)

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Reminds me of an RPG trope... by ohnocitizen · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the elf village's lone Item store languished in the ensuing economic downturn. The nearby hall of the dwarves, however, was a picture of success and wealth. Their bold "all hours shopping" policy meant I could buy potions whether I was stumbling in from a late night dungeon raid or looking for something to help with my morning monster-ridden constitutional.

    2. Re:Reminds me of an RPG trope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of late night scrambled TV shows. (Back when they did NTSC broadcasting, none of this fancy ATSC stuff.)

    3. Re:Reminds me of an RPG trope... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Reminds ME of another little Nintendo RPG trick. "Alchoholic beverage? More like soda! Can't teach american kids to fetch alcoholic beverages for adults!"

  3. Does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids don't purchase games themselves at any time.

    1. Re:Does not make sense by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

      Kids don't purchase games themselves at any time.

      When I was growing up I met plenty of heathen children that had no problem jacking cash or credit card from their parents. Of course these are the same kids who would stay up as late as they want anyway.

      Your point still stands, this does not make any sense.

    2. Re:Does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid, I'd save up my allowance for a couple of weeks just to buy a new game or months just to buy a new console. By the time I was sixteen I had a good job and started buying lots of games and PC hardware.

      Some kids might not buy their own stuff, but certainly not all.

  4. WHY? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    I just have to ask why Nintendo does anything like this. Opt-in for mature^W adolescent content, have that as an option when you first configure the device, just do something that makes this an option if you believe it's to be segregated per audience.

    There's no reason to believe that all households with a WiiU have members that should not be exposed to their catalog, and there's no reason to believe that households with such members will have them unavailable during those hours.

    1. Re:WHY? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I can think of two explainations. It's possible they have a genuine 'for the children!' moral crusader in management, who believes it is the duty of the company to do all it can to keep children from playing games with violent or sexual content. Alternatively, this might be just a stunt intended to boost the company image as the most 'family friendly' console and thus boost sales with the substantial demographic of over-worried parents.

    2. Re:WHY? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      I just have to ask why Nintendo does anything like this.

      To make it more likely that you're tired or drunk and thus easier prey when visiting their store? Or it could be image reason - "it's not our fault you let your children stay up at night". Or maybe someone there wants the online shop to fail for reasons of office politics.

      No matter what the reason, what this tells me is that WiiU should be avoided until things stabilize.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:WHY? by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I was somewhat tempted to buy a WiiU, I don't know why, impulse purchase thing I guess, but this has really closed the doors for me on the idea.

      I only really like adult games, with a few exceptions like Mario, Zelda and Pikmin, childish games that plagued the Wii never really did it for me, I like something with a nice gritty story line or just generally a bit more adult in nature.

      But seeing as I get up for work at 6:30am each morning, and so tend to go to bed about 10:30pm nowadays (gone are the late night gamer days - growing up sucks!) and don't tend to deviate much from that on weekends it basically means I'd either have to stay up and be tired when driving to work, or forego exactly the type of content that I would play.

      So it's lost them at least one sale here, and I suspect many more.

    4. Re:WHY? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the half hour difference between 10:30pm and 11pm would just ruin you.

      Of course, you could always try getting up earlier in the morning, and catch the store before it closes.

    5. Re:WHY? by Vlado · · Score: 0

      I would assume that the content thus affected costs the consumer only 1/6th of the price, since it can be accessed only 1/6th of the time as compared to everything else on the console.

      What? No? Seriously?

    6. Re:WHY? by Vlado · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't go to bed at 11pm. He would go to bed 12am or 1am, or later. And that might ruin him, yes. Depending on how much sleep his particular organism needs and how intense his workplace environment is.

      And in any case, if adult content was purchased then adult content can be consumed whenever the purchaser wants it to. Or the purchaser can decide on another platform that will allow them consumption at their leisure and will not impose its standards on them.

    7. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are seriously institutionalized aren't you? From seeing any critique of your government as an attack, to thinking it's okay for a company to make you change your sleep schedule in order to purchase their products. The rest of us don't bend over so easily for authority.

      Note: Mods, go ahead and mark this troll, but it needed to be said. Pushing the view to always bow to authority is dangerous.

    8. Re:WHY? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

      Certainly the latter seems like the best idea - if you don't like the platform, don't buy it. If you're in bed by dinnertime because you're up at 6:30am, you may have some sleeping problems, though.

    9. Re:WHY? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would actually. I'm really tired if I get my 8 hours, so 10:30pm to 6:30am is the absolute minimum for me if I want to be awake enough for the next day (which is kind of important when you're a) driving, and b) working on complex maths and programming problems for a living).

      Being tired for a console just isn't worth it, especially when the competitors don't have such absurd artificial restrictions.

    10. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the half hour difference between 10:30pm and 11pm would just ruin you.

      Of course, you could always try getting up earlier in the morning, and catch the store before it closes.

      So you think he should just stay up long enough to see the game being enabled and then don't play? How often do you wait for a store to be opened just to go home? Need more analogies?

    11. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10:30pm is hardly dinnertime for a normal person. The science does show that most people need 8 hours sleep a night, and there are also studies that show regularly varying your sleeping pattern is bad for your health. You can't fault someone for looking after their health, I wouldn't fault someone for not looking after their health either in most cases, but I'm not going to suggest someone do something unhealthy if they don't want to. If you think cutting short the amount of sleep you get just to play games is reasonable, it may be that it is you that has sleep problems.

    12. Re:WHY? by grumbel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just have to ask why Nintendo does anything like this.

      Nintendo isn't the only one. Ubisoft's UPlay and EA's Origin don't allow you to buy age 18 content outside of 23:00-6:00 either, even age 16 is locked between 22:00-6:00.

    13. Re:WHY? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you wouldn't be wondering why they're doing it if you had an ability to read and comprehend the summary.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    14. Re:WHY? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      So, the 30 minutes from 10 to 10:30 isn't enough to do a quick check of new TRAILERS or to buy a game?

      I'd be tempted to ask whether you even live in the EU but my confidence in peoples reading comprehension abilities is plummeting.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    15. Re:WHY? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      And perhaps you should read the second paragraph of what you replied to, which speaks against the reasoning presented in the summary.

    16. Re:WHY? by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      Certainly the latter seems like the best idea - if you don't like the platform, don't buy it.

      From Xest's original post that was the great-grandparent to yours above:-

      So it's lost them at least one sale here, and I suspect many more.

      Hmm... sounds like that's *exactly* what he said he was doing anyway.

      Really, your comment sounds like yet another rehash of the old chestnut that because someone isn't being forced to buy something they have no right to criticise it. Wrong.

      If you're in bed by dinnertime because you're up at 6:30am, you may have some sleeping problems, though.

      Maybe he will, maybe he won't. But you're obviously using it as an excuse to deflect criticism of a rather stupid idea Nintendo had, and turn the attack against Xest instead.

      Personally, I'm quite happy for access to "mature" content to be restricted in some way, and for parents to be given the power to stop their children accessing it. But the way they're doing it here is quite stupid, and smacks of an agenda and/or attempt to project an image as opposed to actually being useful. It's the worst aspects of "Think of the Children" and its equivalent of Security Theatre rolled into one.

      Time-based censorship was acceptable in the old "one way" TV days because there was no better way of doing it than restricting such material to times when children were (or should have been) in bed. Even then, (e.g.) video rental stores didn't restrict rental of adult-rated material to certain hours, they simply required proof of age. If this 30-years-out-of-date approach was genuinely the best parental content control that Nintendo could manage in this day and age, then they should sack the entire team that came up with the idea... but of course, it's not, it's a Family-Values-Theatre stunt.

      OTOH, this could (and deservedly should) come back and bite them on the backside with gamers who *do* want "mature" content (like, er... adults). Such pseudo-Nannyish nonsense suggests that Nintendo are going to be playing silly b****rs and interfering with such material in an attempt to pander to their image. Given that the "next gen" Wii U is at best little better than the current-gen consoles and the new XBox will probably arrive in the next year and blow it out of the water, most such gamers will probaby not bother with it anyway...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    17. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you wouldn't be so eager to leap to the defense of an absolutely idiotic restriction if you weren't such a flaming fanboy with Nintendo's collective cock thrust down your throat.

    18. Re:WHY? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      They have parental controls, quite a slew of them, all available as options. Your reasoning is stupid and wouldn't survive a court of law. It's called broadcasting. Whether or not someone at Nintendo misunderstood the broadcasting laws from Germany and that they shouldn't apply to digital downloads, or to all of the EU, is another story. Perhaps videos are multi-casted to preserve bandwidth, or games torrented, in which case the broadcast laws do apply and they are legally obliged to implement this strategy. Perhaps they're only implementing a blanket ban in the EU to get the WiiU to conform to the laws to have a successful launch. Perhaps, they'll later divide the EU into smaller restrictive sets, or fix it so it only applies to child accounts (it may or may not already, there seems to be confusion around this).

      If you have to wonder why, you're obviously not very good at wondering.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    19. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most working people are in bed around 10:30 PM and up at 6:30 AM. Maybe you're the one with sleeping problems if you're having dinner so late at night.

    20. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, I'm sure staying up a half hour on the WEEKEND would be such a terrible hardship.

      If you don't want to purchase $ITEM because they have some absurd restriction, great. Just say it. But don't dress it all up in some ridiculous "I can't stay up an extra 1/2 hour on the weekend ONE time to buy a game that I can then play anytime I want".

      I agree that the restriction is ridiculous, but just leave it at that. Everything else distracts from the real issue.

    21. Re:WHY? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You are seriously institutionalized aren't you? From seeing any critique of your government as an attack, to thinking it's okay for a company to make you change your sleep schedule in order to purchase their products. The rest of us don't bend over so easily for authority.

      So companies are now authorities?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    22. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's only the purchase of the content that's being restricted. Once purchased, you can access the content at any time.

    23. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't take over an hour to purchase a game. Stay up still 11PM, hit the buy button, go to bed at 11:05PM. Let the console download and install and auto sleep. Just because you buy a game, doesn't mean you have to play it right away. It's the same as with alcohol. You might not consume the alcohol for months after you buy it. There might be time and day restrictions on buying alcohol, but you can consume it anytime you want. He can save these purchases for the weekend, where an extra 30 minutes won't hurt much at all.

    24. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the new Xbox play Nintendo games? No, so it isn't much of a substitute is it. The new Xbox will be about as good for playing Nintendo first party titles (almost all I want), as a waffle iron would be at cooking rice.

    25. Re: WHY? by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Umm. Been to Europe much? A late dinner is very common, especially in the summer.

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    26. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you grab a used NES with Super Mario Bros., The Legend of Zelda and Metroid then? All of the Nintendo first party rehashes are basically the exact same things that you keep re-purchasing, over and over and over again.

    27. Re: WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, been outside of your country much? Most of Europe doesn't practice your odd little custom.

    28. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could continue to follow his normal sleeping schedule, and use a gaming platform that doesn't require breaking it to purchase certain games.

    29. Re:WHY? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      That longer time makes more sense, if you're going to sleep before 10 then the odds are you can make the purchase just before 6am...

      Still stupid nannying though.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    30. Re:WHY? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Certainly the latter seems like the best idea - if you don't like the platform, don't buy it.

      That's exactly what the OP said he was doing (which you previously objected to), you dumbass!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    31. Re:WHY? by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the half hour difference between 10:30pm and 11pm would just ruin you.

      Of course, you could always try getting up earlier in the morning, and catch the store before it closes.

      It's still stupid, and based on the bizarre idea that kids won't have access to their console during that period. How bout asking parents to lock down their credit cards a little more tightly?

    32. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the governmental regulations, not the entertainment industry.

      It is the nanny-states that restrict adult entertainment until the kiddies are in bed that caused the problem.

    33. Re: WHY? by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Not my custom, but yes, been outside of my country a lot (relatively speaking of course). Whether or not most of Europe practices that custom is irrelevant. The fact that some parts of Europe do eat late dinners prove that "10:30pm is hardly dinnertime for a normal person." is a stupid and incorrect statement. I realize you are most likely not the same AC, but whatever.

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    34. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does not compute. There is no video game console company competing for the family friendly console image. Nintendo's consoles would not even have survived this long without including mature content titles. This is just typical epic stupidity from upper management. These fuckers are worthless.

    35. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the 30 minutes from 10 to 10:30 isn't enough to do a quick check of new TRAILERS or to buy a game?

      How would you suggest someone checks stuff between 10 to 10:30 when it isn't available until 11?

      I feel that the following statement applies quite well.

      I'd be tempted to ask whether you even live in the EU but my confidence in peoples reading comprehension abilities is plummeting.

    36. Re: WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only place in Europe where people eat that late is Spain, maybe Portugal. It is NOT common, which is the point. The only stupid and incorrect thing here is you.

      You don't even live in Europe. You need to shut the fuck up.

    37. Re:WHY? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      some of us work later shifts you insensitive clod!

    38. Re:WHY? by bolthole · · Score: 1

      And that might ruin him, yes. Depending on how much sleep his particular organism needs and how intense his workplace environment is.

      What, he works *7 days a week* ??

    39. Re:WHY? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could always try getting up earlier in the morning, and catch the store before it closes.

      He shouldn't have to. If the grocery store only sold beer from 11:00 PM to 3:00 AM I'd never drink; this is the same thing. It's really, really stupid, almost as stupid as trying to defend the stupid practice.

  5. Banned in Britain by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Nintendo to Europe: Go to bed.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:Banned in Britain by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Europe to Nintendo: Go fuck yourself, I'm not in the mood to let you take me to bed.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. (Not quite) FIRST POST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It would have been, but I had to wait for my four-hour window due to the sleazy nature of this post.

  7. So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by kramerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    too bad...

    1. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you are 18- you don't have a credit card.

    2. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised.

    3. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by kjell79 · · Score: 1

      Only if they're working the night shift 7 days a week without a day off ... In Europe of all places where many countries prove many more weeks of vacation than in the US? I think most can cope.

    4. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why? I'd rather work 6pm to 4am than 6am to 4pm.

      It may surprise you, but there are people who enjoy living during the night.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Windwraith · · Score: 2

      Funny, I am European and I am doing night shift 7 days a week.
      And, even if I had a free day, breaking the sleep schedule just to play along with Nintendo is not worth the sacrifice.

      3DS was horrible for their bizarre region lock that rendered the console practically useless for hardcore European gamers. Wii U looks even worse. Screw nintendo, they lost a long time customer.

    6. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by icsx · · Score: 1

      Why? I'd rather work 6pm to 4am than 6am to 4pm.

      It may surprise you, but there are people who enjoy living during the night.

      The point was that if you work in night shift, you cannot access the content within the timeframe.

    7. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring the possibility of using a parent's credit card, I had my own debit/credit card at 14.

    8. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Care to explain what the region lock of the 3DS did?

    9. Re:So if you are 18+ and work a night shift, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but most people work only 5 or 6 days a week, not 7. 7 day work weeks are typically an occasional thing, not every single week.

  8. Long live DRM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRM, the right of the content provider to decree what you can do with it, and when and where, protected by laws instituted under thunderpus applause to protect the industry, has again shown its true face.

    Now its just buying... once this is seen as normal, the next step is playing... checked by a digitally signed timestamp from a trusted ntpx server.

    There is only one answer - make DRM of any kind illegal under consumer protectiom laws.

    1. Re:Long live DRM! by Firehed · · Score: 2

      This isn't DRM, this is just having really weird store hours.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:Long live DRM! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I don't see how DRM comes into play here. You can certainly instruct your web server to show/not show certain information based on current time without employing any sort of DRM.

      Next you'll claim that Slashdot only allowing to discuss a story for limited time and then archiving the discussion is DRM, too.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Long live DRM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step two will be enforcing times when you can view/play the content. Daddy buys it at 1:00 am, kiddie plays it at 4:00 pm. That part will be enforcable only with DRM.

      ALWAYS look for the motive behind things...

    4. Re:Long live DRM! by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      That's not DRM, that's Parental Controls. Which is the whole fucking POINT. This is a non-issue, a decent implementation of parental controls deals with all of this already, absolutely no reason to restrict things for everyone.

    5. Re:Long live DRM! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Parental Control means that the parents control what the kids do. Not that the parents get controlled by some corporations so they let their kids do only what the corporation wants.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    between the hours of 3 a.m. and 11 p.m

    So, most of the daytime?

    1. Re:Editors... by Wingman+5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the point! During the daytime you can not download games rated PEGI 18+

    2. Re:Editors... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      between the hours of 3 a.m. and 11 p.m

      So, most of the daytime?

      Yes, most of the daytime the purchases are blocked. The summary also mentions the inverse (11 pm to 3 am) being the time when purchases are allowed. Thus, no editorial mistake regarding the times in the summary.

    3. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live around the arctic circle, it's ALL of the daytime.

  10. A lack of credit card... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...tends to handle this issue on its own. At least as far as purchases go.

    As for the rest, just do what every single other recent console has done and put password-protected access restrictions in the system. Not only does it give more granular control to the customer, it also ensures that Nintendo's rules aren't enforced on people who don't want them, while also ensuring that night shift workers won't be left without a way to purchase content.

    Their solution has got to be one of the worst choices out of the options that were available.

    1. Re:A lack of credit card... by Splab · · Score: 2

      Lack of creditcard is no good. It's quite common for adults to be using Maestro or Electron cards in Europe.

      But to be honest, preventing people to buy a product is just stupid. It's not going to prevent young ones from playing the games - if the parents aren't smart enough to restrict gameplay, restricting buying time doesn't help.

    2. Re:A lack of credit card... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      ...tends to handle this issue on its own. At least as far as purchases go.

      At least in Germany, prepaid credit cards are available for minors. Indeed, the lowest age offering I've found with a short web search is starting at 7 years.

      I'm not sure that the payment receiver can distinguish such credit cards from regular ones.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:A lack of credit card... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      And honestly, if someone under 18 is capable enough and has enough money to get a credit card, their own game console, and Internet access that doesn't depend on their parents, I say they are mature enough to download a "mature" video game.

    4. Re:A lack of credit card... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that attitude makes you no better than they.

    5. Re:A lack of credit card... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a credit card. You can go to the store and buy Nintendo Eshop cards with cash. At least they have those in the US, I don't see why Europe wouldn't have them.

  11. Wiiiiiii by stanlyb · · Score: 2

    This is the sound that my Wii U makes, when i throw it out from my flat....

    1. Re:Wiiiiiii by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Is it attached to a small piglet that used to do commercials for Geico?

  12. Parental Controls by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shouldn't a feature like this be tied to parental controls rather than an all or nothing approach?

    1. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be nonexistent?

    2. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem. HBO many years ago would show R rated movies only at night. Don't complain about censorship this is the right thing to do.

    3. Re:Parental Controls by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 2

      Parental controls are a good thing if they're optional.

    4. Re:Parental Controls by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely! Parental controls already exist on other consoles like Xbox 360 to handle exactly this sort of thing. And any minor who can bypass those controls can easily STAY UP UNTIL 11PM, making this just a bunch of completely useless pandering towards the "family values" crowd...

    5. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parental control is an oxymoron.

    6. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In a world without night shifts maybe. The world is far too complex for such an oversimplified approach.

    7. Re:Parental Controls by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      This isn't about playing a game between those hours (which would be insane). It's about buying a game during those hours. If you give a kid access to buying games and let them play them they can just as soon do it at 11pm.

    8. Re:Parental Controls by CodeheadUK · · Score: 1

      Yep. On by default, but able to be deactivated by a PIN seems a more sane method for those users who don't have kids and don't need nannying.

    9. Re:Parental Controls by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      You're right. My dad keeps escaping from the old persons' home I left him at. They clearly need longer-range tasers to keep him under control.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    10. Re:Parental Controls by Loosifur · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they stopped, because it's a stupid idea.

      --
      This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
    11. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, any half-intelligent kid would just lay in bed until their parents were asleep and then get up to play the game, it's what I would have done, and in fact I did do to watch Steven King's IT when that was on TV when I was 10.

    12. Re:Parental Controls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but back then I could record the movie and watch it whenever I pleased.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Parental Controls by mark-t · · Score: 1

      While there's nothing that can be done to stop a kid from doing something like this, there *are* ways to be absolutely certain that the device was used during the evening after you went to bed, or that it was tampered with in some way.

      I realize that when a parent feels they have to resort to such measures, then in part, there's a battle involved that's already occurred and there's little hope of salvaging, but it can still be better than nothing at all.

    14. Re:Parental Controls by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      And now you can purchase the game and play it whenever you please.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    15. Re:Parental Controls by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      But this isn't HBO, and this isn't many years ago, you stupid clod... just because you think it is the right thing to do doesn't mean we shouldn't have the right to feel differently.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    16. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parental controls are a poor substitute for proper parenting. A well raised child would obey their parents and not need blocks like this in place.

    17. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo's engineers have a real problem with not designing stuff right in the first place and then sweeping it all under the rug of "simplified" and/or "family friendly" interfaces.

    18. Re:Parental Controls by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely! Parental controls already exist on other consoles like Xbox 360 to handle exactly this sort of thing. And any minor who can bypass those controls can easily STAY UP UNTIL 11PM, making this just a bunch of completely useless pandering towards the "family values" crowd...

      As Apple and everyone who has dealt with the V-Chip knows, nobody uses parental controls, even when it says so right on the box or users are forced to enable them. Parent simply hands device off to their kids and lets them play with it directly. Or they let the kid set it up. They're basically useless things that are used to show government groups that they're on top of regulations.

      As for pandering to the family values group - they're pretty powerful, and really, it's "good enough". Instead of a complex setup of parental controls, it's something that works well enough, and if a family group parent complains, you can ask right back "well, why are you letting your kid stay up past 11PM?".

    19. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up with the first generation of internet blocking software. Thankfully my parents and school respected and trusted me more than most. I had friends, however, who did get blocked at home. From my experience it only caused resentment and fueled a need to break the rules. ...now this is teenagers I'm talking about and the extremely complex step of internet filtering. I think the simpler filters designed with younger kids in mind (like the Wii U's store hours) are much more useful and defensible. In general though, I believe parental controls are as likely as not to alienate and pressure kids into the wrong choices whereas calm explanation and guidance will help fuel a persons own self control.

    20. Re:Parental Controls by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I have no idea where you were going with this, it was so all over the map... but are you saying because the technology was provided and clearly explained that parents are not responsible for their kids and the government and corporations should have to limit access to content to *EVERYONE* in that case?

      Because, honestly, that's bullshit, and censorship. I am all for selective programmatic restriction of adult content to children but blanket blocking to EVERYONE just because of lazy parents. Whatever. Nanny state to the extreme...

      Oh, and Apple had never dealt with a "V-Chip" since they have never made a TV. V-Chip is an ancient and obsolete analog XDS-based standard.

    21. Re:Parental Controls by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It is tied to parental control. In the hours when the parents are least likely to be controlling what their 13 year old is doing in the privacy of their own bedroom, that's when the 18+ games will be available.

    22. Re:Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on Wii U you can't. You have to purchase it when Nintendo pleases.

    23. Re:Parental Controls by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood. My sentence is to be parsed like the other one I modelled it after, in the post I replied to:

      "Yes, but back then I could record the movie and watch it whenever I pleased."

      Here it is clear that he couldn't record the movie whenever he pleased, but had to do it whenever it was broadcast. After recording, he could watch it whenever he pleased. That is, that sentence is to be parsed as "Yes, but back then I could (record the movie) and (watch it whenever I pleased)." not "Yes, but back then I could (record the movie and watch it) whenever I pleased."

      The same applies to my sentence: "And now you can purchase the game and play it whenever you please." It is also be parsed as "And now you can (purchase the game) and (play it whenever you please)." not "And now you can (purchase the game and play it) whenever you please."

      Hint: Always read the context of a post, especially if without the context the sentence would be ambiguous.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. FUD title is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is only for the eShop. After you have the game, then it doesn't matter. Sure, it's annoying, but it's only something you have to deal with when you want to buy a game. I don't think it's very outrage worthy, which is how some people are reacting, but whatever.

    Here's a less FUDy article

    I still think it's silly, especially it ending at 3am (or is that when kids wake up in Europe...?), but it's not like it's forcing you to only play your games in a specific 4 hour period.

    1. Re:FUD title is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think it's silly, especially it ending at 3am (or is that when kids wake up in Europe...?), but it's not like it's forcing you to only play your games in a specific 4 hour period.

      ... yet.

      People have to get used to yesterday's outrages before today's seem like just a little insignificant thing.

    2. Re:FUD title is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is only for the eShop. After you have the game, then it doesn't matter. Sure, it's annoying, but it's only something you have to deal with when you want to buy a game. I don't think it's very outrage worthy, which is how some people are reacting, but whatever.

      Here's a less FUDy article

      I still think it's silly, especially it ending at 3am (or is that when kids wake up in Europe...?), but it's not like it's forcing you to only play your games in a specific 4 hour period.

      People ARE outraged because indeed it's something they HAVE TO deal with, as you say, when they don't WANT TO deal with, something that is not of a technical nature but an arbitrary decision made in a boardroom.

      And do we have any guarantees that it's going to stay that way? No, we don't. I need only say "Other OS" and we all know how that works. Nintendo would be crazy do it now, but a year or two down the road, "under pressure from ____" bladibla. It can happen... perhaps imaging the rules for TV broadcasts, so you can play from 9:00pm onwards, but arbitrary play restrictions can be made at any time (notwithstanding the likely existance of ways to circumvent this, which bears no relevance to the discussion about the fact itself).

  14. Haha.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, Nintendo.

  15. jerk hours by RedHackTea · · Score: 0

    But between those hours I jerk off! And there's no way I'm putting down my wee to play with my wii.

    --
    The G
    1. Re:jerk hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jack off for four hours? The reason I masturbate is because I can get it over with quickly and not have to be concerned with her pleasure or the annoying cuddle session afterwards.

  16. Doesn't make sense by SilenceBE · · Score: 1

    On the internet I have seen members of the nintendo defence force but the blame on governments, but the reality is that a Microsoft or Sony also operates in the same markets and they don't have such a moronic way of dealing with this.

    Why they just do 't check the age based on the birthday, a checkbox or whatever... You know how like xbox live, psn or even steam handles it.

    Nintendo and technology... It is like announcing cloud saves and tying an account to a single machine... Oh wait. Really when nintendo is in involved it really doesn't surprises me one bit.

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares how Microsoft, or Sony, or even Nintendo handle it? It is exactly the fault of the governments involved.

      Here is a radical idea: Parents who object to the content can buy (or not) the console that gives them the most control over the content. Problem solved.

      Oh, they'll cry, but little Billy down the street has one and my son Tommy visits (followed by non sequitur which allows them to control other people). If you care *that much* don't let Tommy visit. Obviously it's more important Tommy not see any fictional violence than that he be a properly socialized human being. Hey, at least this way they can blame it on the games.

    2. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      Here is a radical idea: Parents who object to the content can buy (or not) the console that gives them the most control over the content. Problem solved.

      which will not be the Wii U, as it does not give parents any "control". The "control" lies fully with Nintendo and their arbitrary opening hours.

    3. Re:Doesn't make sense by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for the 360, but the PS3 allows you to set a parental level and it is enforced on PSN and PS Home. It works pretty well except for one glaring and inexplicable "feature". If you set the level 8 (for example) it blocks out the names of games over that level and you have more than 1 game it is impossible to tell which is which. So are you launching God of War 3 or Red Dead Redemption? Short of disabling controls or memorizing the install size, you have no way of knowing until its too late.

  17. Three Words by Guppy06 · · Score: 1, Informative

    observing carefully all the relevant regulations regarding content access that are present in the various European countries

    Three words: least common denominator. They are simply abiding by the most stringent requirements in the European market.

    Repeat after me: the EU is not the United States of Europe.

  18. Child account ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a published feature of the child accounts. Either the people reporting this just don't know that and are trying with child accounts, or it's a simple case of the feature being implemented wrong.

  19. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Europe we get these kind of blocks when it comes to Netflix/Amazon/Youtube/IMDB when we are trying to view content that, american companies belives, is reserved for first class citizens only (themselfs). Europe is beeing treated like a second class citizens. I hate it, but then again we have ways to get around that: The Pirate Bay.

    1. Re:Copyright by Dahamma · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Your nanny state government mandates these companies censor your content to ridiculous viewing hours and you blame the *companies*?

      Do you actually live in a democracy or just think you do?

    2. Re:Copyright by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He's actually talking about regional/geographical restrictions, which is another thing entirely.

      But don't let that stop you bragging about how free you are, you dumb fat lardass.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wonder about your thoughht procrss. If these viewing hour restriction was government mandated, then why is Nintendo the only company that has it? Did you think, Sony, Microsoft or Valve have their own European governments?

    4. Re:Copyright by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Or put another way, have you ever known of Sony, Microsoft, or Valve, respecting government laws without being forced to?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  20. Hoax? by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure Nintendo has a bit of a reputation for being rather nannyish but come on, a 4 hour window for 18 rated games? It sounds completely absurd.

    I'm guessing this is either complete bullshit, or there's some parental control enabled by default buried in the options somewhere.

    1. Re:Hoax? by Golden_Rider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure Nintendo has a bit of a reputation for being rather nannyish but come on, a 4 hour window for 18 rated games? It sounds completely absurd.

      I'm guessing this is either complete bullshit, or there's some parental control enabled by default buried in the options somewhere.

      This is only for BUYING that 18+ content, you then can play it at any time of the day you want.

      Which does not really make sense either, because surely the big problem is not kids buying 18+ games - kids PLAYING those games is bad. And if Daddy stays up late to buy his 18+ triple-X-rated games, those games will be on the console the next day when his kids want to play, so what is the point of this shopping restriction...

    2. Re:Hoax? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Also wouldn't arbitrary restrictions like this be enough to sue Nintendo? In Europe I think it's likely that customer protection comes before the EULA. I hope someone sues...

    3. Re:Hoax? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sue them, for what? Can I sue the store when they aren't open when I want milk or bread? Everything must be open 24 hours, or I'm suing.

    4. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem lies in when they decide that it's more than that- buying is really not too distinct from playing, really- and they're as liable as not to enforce that one if they could as well...just give 'em time.

    5. Re:Hoax? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the store's open 24-7. This is more analogous to a Wal-Mart not being able to sell beer and wine in a municipality before and after a certain time because of local liquor laws...save that there's no laws involved with what Nintendo's doing there. So, you're not even close to analogous there.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    6. Re:Hoax? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure the government will allow you to sue them for trying to comply with government regulations.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:Hoax? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to stop Wal-Mart from not selling alcohol at all to anyone from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. because they check ID and that slows up lines in peak times or even "because I feel like it". The problem is someone is complaining that a store will not take their money in exchange for an item at a particular time. You are trying to make the analogy as not-close as possible to make it seem troublesome. I have been to places that stopped alcohol serving in times other than those required by law. They can do that, and commonly do. But that's OK, so long as it's not a video game. Then it's a major infringement on our right to buy shit.

  21. WiiU=Kiddy Console by aepervius · · Score: 1

    That's not me stating that but nintendo europe by restricting the adult content for every user beyond 11pm (when presumably kiddy are in bed) to 3am. Meaning in their mind only kids use those console 3am to 11pm. (what happened to have a parental lock?). Thanks Nintendo I now know as an european I don't need to check your offering , because mostly by 11pm either I am going out, or I am asleep at home. And just a wild stab in the dark, but it will be the same for most adult having a job.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  22. Nintendo Is For Pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup.

  23. Television rules by romiz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In France, there are rules preventing 18+ games from being sown on TV before 22:30. Even channels broadcasting on cable, satellite and dsl networks must respect those rules. That poses a problem to channels like Nolife TV, specialized in video games, because a lot of games get a PEGI 18 rating - if the player is able to kill a human-looking enemy, and this is done in a somewhat realist context, it's PEGI 18. As a result, they must cram discussion of a lot of games in a small time slot.

    The rule was originally designed for movies, by the way, but the French movie rating is much more relaxed than the games rating. For example, the last James Bond movie did not get any restriction at all, it would be PEGI 18 if it were a game. But the movie rating boards in Europe use different standards.

    At then end; it looks like Nintendo took the most restrictive of those rules, and applied them to everyone, as if the WiiU was a TV channel. This will hurt them in more liberal markets. It does not help that Nintendo of Europe is headquartered in Germany, which has the most extreme restrictions on video games, and still requires a separate, different, ugly, enormous, unremovable logo on game packaging and game disks. And this is after the PEGI rating board mainly standardized on rules very close to the German ones...

    1. Re:Television rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But France is a communist country like Venezuela.

    2. Re:Television rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France is socialist not communist you fucking retard.

  24. Set time zone.... by wherrera · · Score: 1

    Need I say more?

    1. Re:Set time zone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you feel the need to say more please do so on your blog.

    2. Re:Set time zone.... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      That's brilliant! The server on the other end couldn't possibly know what time it is!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  25. The world is NOT the US you morons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are places in the world where you won't be charged with "risks to a minor" when said minors got to see a bunch of naked women and men and as such face charges for 30 years in jail (as has happened with a teacher which school PC started showing pr0n stuff due to 2 years (or more) of neglected maintenance. Yet she got to lose her license).

    Try using your brains here for a moment, no matter how hard that seems to be....

    Do it like the cable company does here: during the times where minors could be accidentally (?) selecting certain adult channels you ask for a pin code. And during the rest of the time span you simply display said channel as is.

    Don't treat all your customers like minors, because treating them as such will make them act as such. Guess what? Sony's PS3 doesn't have these stupid restrictions (unless parents add them due to parental control).

    And there goes the next bunch of needed customers....

  26. Returned my Wii U because of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not really sure why I bought my Wii U, but after I found out about this the hard way I decided to return it for a '360 instead.

    Sorry Nintendo. If you don't want to sell me stuff, then I really don't give a shit about your console. It's really bad when people are literally screaming "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY", and Nintendo is saying "No, sorry, we can only do that between the hours of 11PM to 3AM". Fine then, don't- see if I care. Microsoft has been more then happy taking my money at all hours of the day.

  27. Homework Check Content Blocking System Feature by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Bravo, Nintendo! For your next act, I would like to see a method and process for checking if kids have done their homework, before letting them play games. And a connection to the school system database, that lets kids with better grades play games longer. And an active webcam, that only lets kids who cleaned up their rooms play games. Messy room == No games, for you!

    Can a Nintendo drive the kids to soccer games, while the parents are off playing golf . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Homework Check Content Blocking System Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmph. As a nerdy parent I already do all these things myself. I wouldn't have minded Nintendo saving me the work instead of having to write firewall rules that only I could change.

    2. Re:Homework Check Content Blocking System Feature by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break it to you, but a corporation is not responsible for your kids safety or whether they do their chores. If you cannot be assed to raise your kids, use a fuckin' condom.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. Trust me on this one... by Qubit · · Score: 0

    In France, there are rules preventing 18+ games from being sown on TV before 22:30.

    No, no, no -- you're confusing that rule with the one about adult movies -- you know, "no sowing of seed before 22:30". With the 18+ games, they're just concerned about people downloading them. Or as the Internet Buckaneers call it, "reaping what is sown on TV."

    (also, what 18+ games are shown on TV? is that like naked soccer or something?)

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Trust me on this one... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read the message you're replying to?

    2. Re:Trust me on this one... by Qubit · · Score: 1

      OP wrote (and I quote) "there are rules preventing 18+ games from being sown on TV before 22:30"

      Given that your nick translates as "crazy" I didn't expect such a serious reply, but it's possible the humor is an English nuance that doesn't translate well. I'm sorry if English is not your first language.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
  29. Sign of the end of civilization by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe not a sign of the end of civilization, but certainly society is not doing well when a game company has to act like a parent. Shouldn't this stuff be the job of the parents, not the game company?

    1. Re:Sign of the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between a game company having to act like a parent and an overzelaous game company choosing to act like a parent.

    2. Re:Sign of the end of civilization by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Except that parents offload their responsabilities to Gov't and then gov't enacts stupid laws, and then some companies, like Nintendo, choose to follow these laws. You know, almost as if they're following the wishes of the parents.

      It's actually simple to change, just have parents act like parents.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    3. Re:Sign of the end of civilization by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 1

      Except that parents offload their responsabilities

      Well that is the crux of it. They actually can't offload their responsibilities, no more than the Government can give birth to their children. But how to have parents act like parents? There is the real problem. If there was a solution I'm sure we would have heard about it by now.

  30. Potential gamer by grodzix · · Score: 1

    I was considering getting myself a Wii U as it looks quite interesting with games finally on par with PS3 and XBox 360. I also wanted to play some of the excellent games that nintendo makes, but wouldn't be able to get them for PS3. However, if this is really the case, then my consideration for the platform are done and I'm not getting one. I think it may be similar with many other people. Nintendo could finally win back some of the Real gamers, but not when they gonna treat them like some freaks or sick people that can get their fix only when no one is looking. Well done Nintendo for shooting yourself in the foot. So long and thanks for nothing.

    --
    My Windows is NOT slow, it's special!
    1. Re:Potential gamer by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Yes, let's all ban it because Nintendo was being so silly for applying (albeit in a questionable manner) a EU restriction. Let's not give them a chance to fix it, instead let's go with a company that is known to flaunt government regulations in almost every country.

      Nice to know such intelligent people have stayed behind on slashdot.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:Potential gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. I'm a long-time nintendo fan (owned every single console they made since the NES, with the normal exception of the virtualboy) but until they fix their attitude I'm done with them. This time limit nonsense is bad, and the "one download-one console, no re-downloads if your console dies and you buy a replacement" policy is worse.

      You know you're doing it wrong when frickin' Steam has less onerous DRM. At least I can relive my childhood through emulation...

  31. 8th graders are the ones who are up at 2 am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure that those who are up and playing games as those times are the 8th graders who have a computer/console in their own room, not their parents (who have to get to work in the morning).

    Nintendo gets a sense for reality. But they probably only have one in PR and try to solve some legal protests before they arrive. In german TV, for example, you can only show 16+ graded content later than 22:00 and 18+ content 23:00. I guess that what Nintendo is doing there has something to do with that (but they are only walking the wrong path, they should tie that content to the account).

    And no matter what they do: It will not be effective. Either the kids are just staying up late (only to proof "they can") or because they are the ones who set up the account for/of the consonle.

    1. Re:8th graders are the ones who are up at 2 am by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      I'm 58 years old and I was up playing Risen 2 in my room till 3:15am this morning.

      And my daughter complains about the noise. Payback's a bitch. :)

  32. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Oops, I'm at work between 11pm and 3am. On the other hand, I'm not in Europe and I don't play on Nintendo consoles, so it balances out nicely.

  33. can you imagine if apple or sony did this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but since nintendo has the zelda IP (and has been milking it for 30 years) all the gay ass nintentard fanbois will give them a free pass despite not support indie developers and using conflict minerals from africa in their shitty underpowered crapsole.

    1. Re:can you imagine if apple or sony did this? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      No, I cannot seem to imagine Sony or Apple following government guidelines, that's just absurd!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  34. Indeed by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0

    It is the GBA without back lighting, the GBA game saves that consisted of writing down a long string, the inability to turn music off in many Nintendo games.

    It not just being behind on tech it seems there efforts are just plain lazy. A 4 hour window? It reminds me of when I was working on a ISP portal in the last century were they wanted porn because it was the only thing that actually sold but only during late night hours. NOBODY bothers with that kind of stuff anymore because it just don't make sense.

    For instance, once the game has been bought, it is fully available. The games can still be bought through regular shops and lets face it a Nintendo game is so tame anyway that only the most puritan countries have issues with it (Britain and Germany). The only thing Nintendo is showing with this, is that it is still the console for little kiddies. The lousily managed console for little kiddies.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  35. Nintendo needed another reason not to buy the WiiU by Loosifur · · Score: 1

    I'm an American, so this doesn't affect me outside of the fact that the liberals in our country will think it's a great idea in another three to five years. But, really, it's like Nintendo is trying to chase customers away. There are already parental controls, so by making it needlessly difficult to purchase games that are geared towards adults, Nintendo is just sending the (admittedly true) message that they have no interest whatsoever in adult gamers. Unless you're under 14, really like virtual bowling, or are the kind of adult who describes things as "kawaii", there is nothing for you on the WiiU.

    And, speaking as an adult who plays a shit-ton of 18+ games (on PC, thanks very much) 11:00 PM finds me either in bed finishing a book or out at the bar with friends if I'm off the next day. It's been many moons since I didn't have to be up and productive by 8:00 AM, and if I get less than 8 hours of sleep, I'm draggin' ass the next day. Besides which, how many people are going to be lining up for the opportunity to stay up later than they'd like to so they can have the privilege of buying a game from Nintendo?

    --
    This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
  36. Limiting hours: kids aren't up at night! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    Rightttt..... like kids could never ever be able to stay up late enough to be able to make the purchase during that window!!! No, kids never stay up late or wake up in the middle of the night or do things that their parents or society would not want them to do... /sarcasm
    .
    Seriously, parental restrictions would make more sense. (Though I can say that I've had to undo the parental restriction setting on the DVR for my parents at least twice in the last six months.) Teens often don't want to get out of bed til noon on a weekend, we can stay up til 3 and wake up at 6 or 7 and have a lousy but okay day the next day (well it's still the same day, but it feels likes the next day after sleeping from 3:30 to 6:30)

    1. Re:Limiting hours: kids aren't up at night! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Parental restrictions? You mean... you mean I have to do something to protect my kids from violent games. No way! Society has to take that burden off me, and I don't give a shit how much I inconvenience anyone by that because I am a parent! Am I not punished enough already?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. I'm going to guess by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I'm going to guess nobody at Nintendo said "hey, let's arbitrarily restrict content to certain regions at certain times! That's a GREAT idea!"

    Perhaps customers' ire should be directed at their regional and national governments whose laws go overboard in 'protecting the childrenz' (in this case, from staying up too late...)?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:I'm going to guess by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      PEGI is similar to most other systems in place, it's mandatory to inform your customers, but it doesn't mean you cannot sell your items to whoever you please. And it doesn't mean that you cannot buy an "18" game for your 10 year old. Most of all, it doesn't mean you cannot go into a store as an adult at noon and buy whatever game you please.

      In short, I cannot see any kind of pressure on Nintendo to actually do what they did. My guess is that they want to polish their "family friendly" image and pander to the thinkofthechildren crowd rather than any governmental influence.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Soon in the news by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Teachers complaining about sleeping pupils

    "Every time a new part of the latest first person shooter comes out, half of my class doesn't show up at all and the rest is barely able to stay awake", Mrs. T, a high school teacher complains. Yesterday the long awaited Zombie shooter "Brains out" came out and it looks like it turned into reality on the Whatyoumaycallit High. Teenagers shuffling across the corridors from class to class, only to drop dead at their desks to catch up on some much needed sleep.

    "What' worst is that they don't just buy it, of course, after they bought it they immediately want to play it. And since they cannot buy it before 11pm, they play through the night and now... look at them! Sensible teaching is neigh impossible now, their only answer is 'Braaaaains'. I think Nintendo sure dropped the ball on that one"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Soon in the news by PPH · · Score: 1

      Darwin at work.

      This will separate the losers who "have to" stay up late to party, get stoned, play video games or whatever from the students who have learned time management, good studying skills and have set some priorities in their lives. The losers will fall asleep during class and eventually fail. They will go on to jobs involving the flipping of burgers (or whatever it is you Europeans eat) while the genetically superior specimens will go on to college and higher paying careers.

      Unfortunately, this appears to be EU only. So the USA will continue on its reversion to the mean.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Soon in the news by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So that's why geeks are usually so high on the payment ladder? Since we were outcasts from the start, we didn't bother trying to be part of the crowd and didn't subject to peer pressure...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Time for a new product name ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2

    The Nintendo "Curfew U"!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:Time for a new product name ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... the Nintendo Cur FU

    2. Re:Time for a new product name ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Curf U", surely?

  40. Making this illustration a bit more PC by tepples · · Score: 1

    In this illustration, do the dwarves represent PC gaming?

  41. Re:Nintendo needed another reason not to buy the W by Holi · · Score: 1

    Really? it's the liberals in America pushing the "think of the children" laws?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  42. MISLEADING ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is only there in one article but you've been duped. You simply cannot buy these "mature" things from the store except in that time-span. You can still play them to your heart's content all day long.

  43. RPG PC euphemisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    The Wii U with it's sleek vaguely feminine physique and Zelda game series is an Elf
    Xbox is clearly the Dwarves with it's stout stature, drunken vulgarity, and stocky berserker characters.
    I think the PC is the most obvious and needs no explanation: it is the Troll.

    1. Re:RPG PC euphemisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the PC is the most obvious and needs no explanation: it is the Troll.

      A fisherman wouldn't be my first analogy for the PC, but I guess it works. Peaceful, hard working and responsible.

    2. Re:RPG PC euphemisms by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      I think the PC is the most obvious and needs no explanation: it is the Troll.

      A fisherman wouldn't be my first analogy for the PC, but I guess it works. Peaceful, hard working and responsible.

      Peaceful? Tell that to all the fish.

      --
      Your ad here.
  44. Verify Sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTH is slashdot coming to??? "The story originated from a NeoGAF forum user, which reportedly received an email..." Was this verified in any way? A supposed e-mail makes the front page? What's next? "According to a BFRO forum user, PenIs2Large, who reportedly received an e-mail from aliens said..."

    Do these 'editors' have any basic education?

  45. Rolls eyes... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Will the new Xbox play [..] Nintendo first party titles (almost all I want)? No, so it isn't much of a substitute is it.

    Well, let's see... I was talking about "gamers who *do* want "mature" content". Given that you just said that you're almost exclusively interested in "Nintendo first party titles" (i.e. the antithesis of the former), it should be pretty blooming obvious that I wasn't talking about people like you.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  46. Regulators... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    Great regulation; in addition to their minds being corrupted, the kids are going to be falling asleep during school as well.

  47. Logical step by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    This is quite logical if you think about it. Get kids used to government agencies telling them what they can and cant do at certain hours 'for their protection', and they will grow up expecting it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  48. A little laziness makes much business sense here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As anyone who works in security will tell you, implementing a password system is a surefire way to guarantee forgotten password support calls. And implementing self-help forgotten password user aids guarantees support calls about those on top of the forgotten password. That's money I don't want to spend.

    Passwords are useful and wonderful things, but you're leaving the user's lives in their own hands while being expected to be responsible on their behalf when they aren't responsible for themselves...all because you set up a password system in the first place. I never implement passwords when I can pick a lazier-but-just-as-secure lockout method instead (appropriate to the resource I'm protecting, of course), like saying "you can't have this right now."

    In the end, this only really affects children (unauthorized users) and adults with inverted sleep cycles. As someone with a regular sleep cycle, I plan middle-of-the night activities in advance and arrange my sleeping accordingly; people with inverted sleep cycles should be able to do the same for daytime activities, and I assume that's what they must do already given the day-centricity of almost everything else on the planet. Where this hurts Nintendo lies exactly in exactly one edge case AFAICT: Customers who would have otherwise bought affected games at restricted hours and choose not to buy them during unrestricted hours for any reason. No offense to any such affected users out there, but that's nothing.

  49. Please take my hand because my parents can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are both pirates and lost their arms after all.

  50. Re:Nintendo needed another reason not to buy the W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one who pushes these insane restrictions can correctly be called liberal.

  51. In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck You Nintendo.

  52. Credit card by phorm · · Score: 1

    One would think that if you're buying with a credit card (in your own name) that there's some age validation there.
    I'd expect there's some weird regulations going on there. I doubt most companies want to prevent you from giving them money (unless they're the RIAA/MPAA in which case control > money)

    1. Re:Credit card by grumbel · · Score: 1

      I don't think the law is at fault in this case. The law forbids it to sell age 18 games to minors, but it does not force a time limit on sales, so as long as you verified your age in some manner, that should be enough. I think Origin actually allows you to verify your age via your person id and thus work around the time limit.