Slashdot Mirror


Baltimore Issued Speed Camera Ticket To Motionless Car

SternisheFan sends this story from the Baltimore Sun: "The Baltimore City speed camera ticket alleged that the four-door Mazda wagon was going 38 miles per hour in a 25-mph zone — and that owner Daniel Doty owed $40 for the infraction. But the Mazda wasn't speeding. It wasn't even moving. The two photos printed on the citation as evidence of speeding show the car was idling at a red light with its brake lights illuminated. A three-second video clip also offered as evidence shows the car motionless, as traffic flows by on a cross street. Since the articles' publication, several lawmakers have called for changes to the state law that governs the way the city and other jurisdictions operate speed camera programs. Gov. Martin O'Malley said Tuesday that state law bars contractors from being paid based on the number of citations issued or paid —an approach used by Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Howard County and elsewhere. 'The law says you're not supposed to charge by volume. I don't think we should charge by volume,' O'Malley said. "If any county is, they need to change their program.'"

7 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Obviously guilty by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

    He is guilty. Clearly guilty of embarrassing some government officials with his so called 'evidence'. Lock him up.

  2. The camera was only out by 38mph! by kawabago · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well within the manufacturers margin of error!

  3. Re:Not legal here. by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lawyers. The judge outlawed lawyers.

  4. My idea by rk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have an idea for making traffic safety laws about traffic safety and not revenue generation:

    Pass a law that says all proceeds from moving violation citations go into a statewide fund. Then every 12 months, the funds are distributed evenly to every licensed driver in the state who has a 36 month clean driving record. Good drivers get rewarded by bad drivers, who pay into the fund with their tickets, and municipalities can't turn traffic laws into a cash cow with bullshit like speed traps, red-light cameras with short yellow lights, and other shenanigans.

  5. Re:Not legal here. by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a pedestrian I try to always understand that in a battle of "Who can pay less attention to where they are going" the pedestrian will always lose.
    So I do not play that game. I assume the drive does not see me till I know he does.
    When I ride a motorcycle I do the same.
    Pedestrians that step onto a road hoping that cars see them and stop need to fail at this before they pass on their defective genes to offspring.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  6. Re:Not legal here. by Jesse_vd · · Score: 5, Funny

    My father was a lawyer, we used to go on road trips to fight the speeding ticket we got on the last road trip.

    My favourite defence was the calibration log. "Manual says it has to be calibrated at each shift, do you have records showing it was calibrated on the morning of _______? Nope? Thanks, have a nice day."

    And then we'd sit in the back and watch every other defendant use the same questions and get let off :)

  7. Re:Not legal here. by c0lo · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a non-pedestrian

    How do you get to/from your car? Teleport?

    He doesn't. Was born in a trailer, will live in a car or a trailer, will die in a trailer.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.