Slashdot Mirror


Coral Reefs In Grave Danger, Say Climate Simulations

sciencehabit writes "Nearly every coral reef could be dying by 2100 if current carbon dioxide emission trends continue, according to a new review of major climate models from around the world. The only way to maintain the current chemical environment in which reefs now live, the study suggests, would be to deeply cut emissions as soon as possible. It may even become necessary to actively remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, say with massive tree-planting efforts or machines."

3 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Who cares? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Informative

    So what if all the Coral Reefs die,

    Most of the sea life in the ocean will die. The reefs are a critical component of the food chain for fish of all sizes, including plenty that don't directly live on the reef itself.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  2. Re:RT (WHOLE) FA by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want to RT (WHOLE) FA then why did you stop quoting him before the end of the paragraph where he said:

    "[But] an important point made by [Caldeira] is that corals have had many millions of years of opportunity to extend their range into low omega waters. With rare exception they have failed. What are the chances that they will adapt to lowering omega in the next 100 years?"

    QT (WHOLE) FQ! Did the last note of warning and agreement with the study not fit with your message of excluding the dissenting scientist? What is more likely: that the part about them working together previously was some hidden way of saying that Rau was censored or that he was giving full disclosure of a prior relationship? Conspiracy theory or standard (and best) practice?

  3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong, decimated means every tenth soldier executed to encourage the others. Only 10% die.