Why Linux On Microsoft Surface Is a Tough Challenge
hypnosec writes "With Linux enthusiasts and distro publishers eagerly waiting for a solution to Microsoft's UEFI SecureBoot, there are those who have already looked at the viability of Linux on Microsoft Surface tablet. Matthew Garrett, a.k.a. UEFI-guru, has revealed that those who are keeping their fingers crossed and hoping to find run Linux on Microsoft's tablet are on an uphill walk and it doesn't seem to be an easy one. So why is this? The answer is in the manner in which Microsoft has restricted the Surface from loading non-signed software / binaries by implementing UEFI SecureBoot. Microsoft has loaded on the ARM based tablet its private key instead of the 'Microsoft Windows UEFI Driver Publisher' key, which is needed to sign non-Microsoft software like Linux distributions or loaders. So, no publisher key = no signed non-Microsoft binary = no Linux."
Yeah you stupid Linux nerds, stop trying to use your hardware as you see fit and start doing as the vendor tells you.
Nonsense.
Says the AC.
Again, what's with this "all or nothing" nonsense? Why does making an OS run on a device that was designed to lock the user out run Linux mean that other efforts must stop?
There's zero proof of that. Not to mention that there are other Windows RT devices out there similarly locked down.
Err, no. Bad analogy.
More like "I bought a saw, but it only cuts Microsoft Wood, and a hammer but it only drives Microsoft Nails." But it still doesn't work.
In what market are you proposing Microsoft has a monopoly ?
"Dominant market share" ? In what market ? Not tablet hardware. Not tablet OSes. Not tablet software. What market ?