Slashdot Mirror


USMA: Going the Extra Kilometer For Metrication

EagleHasLanded writes "The U.S. Metric Association has been advocating for metrication since 1916 – without much success. In the mid-1970s, the U.S. government passed the Metric Conversion Act, but now it seems the time for complete conversion has come and gone. Or could U.S. educators and health & safety advocates put this issue back on Congress' radar screen?"

14 of 909 comments (clear)

  1. Cut out the intermediary step. by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cut out the intermediary step. Adopt the units of the future world superpower now.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_units_of_measurement

    1. Re:Cut out the intermediary step. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your height in cm.

      I prefer mm. 1820mm sounds pretty damn impressive.

      Your weight is in kgs.

      I prefer tonnes. 0.105 sounds far less depressing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. The US likes being different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pissing the rest of the world off is just a bonus.

    1. Re:The US likes being different by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chinese engineers can't figure out imperial? Cool story bro.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  3. You have to have the right selling point... by ClaraBow · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you have to do is convince the male congressional leaders that they will gain manhood size once we convert over to metric! 15 is a whole lot bigger than 6 :)

    1. Re:You have to have the right selling point... by slashgordo. · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Jesus were using the metric system while riding a dinosaur, we might could convince the US congressional leaders to switch to metric.

  4. Boggle by Tim+Ward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are the Colonies really still using Imperial units? - thought they must have stopped doing that yonks ago, after losing all those space probes to erroneous conversions between foot-slug-poundals and furlongs-per-fortnight.

    Or is it like their refusal to use global standard paper sizes, or basically follow any other international standards - if it was invented in Europe it must de facto be Communist and therefore can't be touched with a barge pole?

    1. Re:Boggle by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      2- You can shove your commie paper sizes up your "arse".

      Yes, far more easily. See, when I cut or fold my A4, I get an A5. And I cut or fold that again, and get A6. Then A7. All the same shape, with no bits and pieces leftover to be cut off. So I end up with 16 nice wipes of A8 and no shit on my hands.

    2. Re:Boggle by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good point.

      I come across this when calculating how much fuel to put in an aeroplane - the bowser dispenses litres, I need to know what that is in pounds for the weight and balance calculation, and the fuel burn (and thus how much fuel I need) is specified in the POH in gallons per hour ... ... but these are indeed American gallons, not Imperial ones, and getting that sort of thing wrong can kill people.

      Well that makes my example of a quiche baked from an English cookbook turning out kind of dry seem rather trivial in comparison.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Boggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's OK, I don't think I've ever seen an A4 sheet of paper. In fact, I can't even tell you its dimensions. I know a piece of Letter paper, which is what I would use to write a letter (if such things still exist), is 8.5"x11". Maybe it's not nice round numbers, but it's 2 significant figures (like all ANSI paper sizes), easy to remember, and can be measured with any ruler.

      The ISO paper sizes, OTOH, are completely irrational. And I say that because they're based on the square root of 2, which unfortunately is not a rational number. So you end up with an A4 size of 210mmx297mm. Of course if I don't remember that, I can always just calculate it if I remember the formula: An A0 sheet of paper is a square meter with a 1:1.414 aspect ratio, so its dimensions are the 4th root of 2 by the 4th root of 2 divided by the square root of 2 (2^(1/4) x 2^(1/4)/2^(1/5)). I don't need a calculator to tell you that's 1.189mx0.x841m. Then you just fold it in half 4 times and round down, so you get 2^(1/4) / 4 * 1000 = 297mm by 2^(1/4) / 2^(1/2) / 4 * 1000 = 210mm. See? Easy as pi!

      dom

  5. Re:0.001km = 0.01hm = 1m = 10dm = 100cm = 1000mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Does the BIBLE say that the lenth Noahes' arc was 137 meter's long? Or hiding you're light under 35 cubac centermeter's? Noah way. Feet and Yards and Cubics and Furlow's are GOD's units."

    Your spelling hurts my wiener.

  6. Yet another step towards godless communism by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 3, Funny

    First the United Nations, then Darwinism, then Galileo. If they force us to use litres, we'll all be living in the USSR before the decade ends.

  7. Re:Long Live Roman measurements by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did a little fact checking before posting

    Sacrilege.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. Re:Long Live Roman measurements by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alright, but apart from better sanitation, medicine, education, irrigation, public health, roads, a freshwater system, public order and an automobile suspension... what have the Romans done for us?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/